EWT vs. PSI

Last updated Jun 13, 2026

EWT (iShares MSCI Taiwan ETF) and PSI (Invesco Semiconductors ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - EWT is a Asia Pacific Equities fund tracking the MSCI Taiwan Index, while PSI is a Semiconductors fund tracking the Dynamic Semiconductors Intellidex Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, EWT returned 19.56%/yr vs 34.59%/yr for PSI. A 0.63 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. EWT charges 0.59%/yr vs 0.56%/yr for PSI.

Performance

EWT vs. PSI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares MSCI Taiwan ETF (EWT) and Invesco Semiconductors ETF (PSI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EWT achieves a 61.53% return, which is significantly lower than PSI's 112.90% return. Over the past 10 years, EWT has underperformed PSI with an annualized return of 19.56%, while PSI has yielded a comparatively higher 34.59% annualized return.

EWT

• 1D: 0.17%
• 1M: 8.18%
• YTD: 61.53%
• 6M: 67.45%
• 1Y: 89.17%
• 3Y*: 34.98%
• 5Y*: 17.48%
• 10Y*: 19.56%

PSI

• 1D: 3.00%
• 1M: 10.45%
• YTD: 112.90%
• 6M: 110.54%
• 1Y: 198.40%
• 3Y*: 55.80%
• 5Y*: 32.57%
• 10Y*: 34.59%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EWT vs. PSI - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
EWT iShares MSCI Taiwan ETF	61.53%	28.38%	16.11%	23.97%	-28.90%	26.18%	31.50%	33.36%	-9.90%	26.81%
PSI Invesco Semiconductors ETF	112.90%	36.32%	17.17%	49.06%	-34.43%	46.55%	56.75%	52.49%	-11.55%	40.16%

Correlation

The correlation between EWT and PSI is 0.72, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.72
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.68
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.70
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.66
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 23, 2005	0.63

The correlation between EWT and PSI has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.63 to 0.72 - a consistent structural relationship.

EWT vs. PSI - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	EWT	PSI
Technology	72.9%	97.6%
Financial Services	13.0%	-
Industrials	4.9%	2.4%
Basic Materials	3.5%	-
Consumer Cyclical	1.9%	-
Communication Services	1.9%	-
Consumer Defensive	1.1%	-
Healthcare	0.8%	-
Energy	-	-
Real Estate	-	-
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

EWT vs. PSI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EWT

EWT Risk / Return Rank: 94
EWT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 95
EWT Sortino Ratio Rank: 92
EWT Omega Ratio Rank: 92
EWT Calmar Ratio Rank: 96
EWT Martin Ratio Rank: 95

PSI

PSI Risk / Return Rank: 97
PSI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 98
PSI Sortino Ratio Rank: 95
PSI Omega Ratio Rank: 94
PSI Calmar Ratio Rank: 98
PSI Martin Ratio Rank: 98

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EWT vs. PSI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Taiwan ETF (EWT) and Invesco Semiconductors ETF (PSI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	EWT	PSI	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	3.36	4.92	-1.57
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.88	4.57	-0.69
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.55	1.63	-0.08
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	8.53	12.90	-4.38
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	25.15	45.29	-20.14

EWT vs. PSI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EWT Sharpe Ratio is 3.36, which is lower than the PSI Sharpe Ratio of 4.92. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EWT and PSI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

EWT vs. PSI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EWT drawdown since its inception was -64.37%, roughly equal to the maximum PSI drawdown of -62.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EWT and PSI.

Drawdown Indicators

	EWT	PSI	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-64.37%	-62.96%	-1.41%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-10.51%	-15.48%	+4.97%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-25.66%	-41.07%	+15.41%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-38.88%	-44.85%	+5.97%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-38.88%	-44.85%	+5.97%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-4.19%	0.00%	-4.19%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-19.21%	-15.92%	-3.29%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.56%	4.40%	-0.84%

Volatility

EWT vs. PSI - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares MSCI Taiwan ETF (EWT) is 13.55%, while Invesco Semiconductors ETF (PSI) has a volatility of 18.89%. This indicates that EWT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PSI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	EWT	PSI	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	13.55%	18.89%	-5.34%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	22.68%	33.67%	-10.99%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	26.75%	40.58%	-13.83%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	22.95%	38.44%	-15.49%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	21.78%	35.42%	-13.64%

EWT vs. PSI - Expense Ratio Comparison

EWT has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is higher than PSI's 0.56% expense ratio.

Dividends

EWT vs. PSI - Dividend Comparison

EWT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.74%, more than PSI's 0.04% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
EWT iShares MSCI Taiwan ETF	2.74%	4.43%	3.32%	8.12%	18.82%	0.55%	1.83%	2.49%	3.16%	2.81%	2.39%	3.12%
PSI Invesco Semiconductors ETF	0.04%	0.10%	0.15%	0.40%	0.61%	0.14%	0.21%	0.52%	0.83%	0.21%	0.68%	0.16%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both EWT and PSI in my portfolio?

EWT and PSI have a correlation of 0.72, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, EWT or PSI?

PSI has higher volatility (18.89%) compared to EWT (13.55%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EWT dropped -64.37% vs PSI's -62.96%.

Which ETF is better, EWT or PSI?

On 10-year performance, PSI leads with 34.59% vs 19.56% for EWT. On fees, PSI is cheaper at 0.56% per year. On volatility, EWT has been the lower-risk option at 13.55%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, EWT or PSI?

Over the 10-year period, PSI has performed better with a 34.59% return vs 19.56%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, EWT or PSI?

PSI is cheaper with a 0.56% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for EWT.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, EWT or PSI?

EWT has the higher dividend yield at 2.74%, compared with 0.04% for PSI.

What is the main difference between EWT and PSI?

EWT is categorized as Asia Pacific Equities, while PSI is Semiconductors. EWT tracks MSCI Taiwan Index, while PSI tracks Dynamic Semiconductors Intellidex Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for EWT and 0.56% for PSI.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

PSI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.92 vs 3.36), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.