PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EWT vs. GUNR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EWT vs. GUNR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares MSCI Taiwan ETF (EWT) and FlexShares Morningstar Global Upstream Natural Resources Index Fund (GUNR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EWT achieves a 61.53% return, which is significantly higher than GUNR's 15.74% return. Over the past 10 years, EWT has outperformed GUNR with an annualized return of 19.56%, while GUNR has yielded a comparatively lower 11.10% annualized return.


EWT

1D
0.17%
1M
8.18%
YTD
61.53%
6M
67.45%
1Y
89.17%
3Y*
34.98%
5Y*
17.48%
10Y*
19.56%

GUNR

1D
1.19%
1M
-5.35%
YTD
15.74%
6M
17.02%
1Y
34.03%
3Y*
12.40%
5Y*
9.47%
10Y*
11.10%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EWT vs. GUNR - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
EWT
iShares MSCI Taiwan ETF
61.53%28.38%16.11%23.97%-28.90%26.18%31.50%33.36%-9.90%26.81%
GUNR
FlexShares Morningstar Global Upstream Natural Resources Index Fund
15.74%30.03%-8.37%-2.40%14.83%26.06%0.46%18.41%-9.42%18.74%

Correlation

The correlation between EWT and GUNR is 0.36, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.36

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.46

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.50

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.55

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 22, 2011

0.58

Over the past year, the correlation between EWT and GUNR has dropped to 0.36 - well below their long-term average of 0.58, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

EWT vs. GUNR - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
EWT
GUNR

Technology

72.9%
0.5%

Financial Services

13.0%
2.7%

Industrials

4.9%
2.3%

Basic Materials

3.5%
45.1%

Consumer Cyclical

1.9%
0.2%

Communication Services

1.9%
1.7%

Consumer Defensive

1.1%
11.5%

Healthcare

0.8%

-

Energy

-

29.3%

Real Estate

-

0.2%

Utilities

-

4.0%

Technology

EWT
72.9%
GUNR
0.5%

Financial Services

EWT
13.0%
GUNR
2.7%

Industrials

EWT
4.9%
GUNR
2.3%

Basic Materials

EWT
3.5%
GUNR
45.1%

Consumer Cyclical

EWT
1.9%
GUNR
0.2%

Communication Services

EWT
1.9%
GUNR
1.7%

Consumer Defensive

EWT
1.1%
GUNR
11.5%

Healthcare

EWT
0.8%
GUNR

-

Energy

EWT

-

GUNR
29.3%

Real Estate

EWT

-

GUNR
0.2%

Utilities

EWT

-

GUNR
4.0%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EWT vs. GUNR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EWT
EWT Risk / Return Rank: 9494
Overall Rank
EWT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9595
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EWT Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
EWT Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
EWT Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
EWT Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank

GUNR
GUNR Risk / Return Rank: 8080
Overall Rank
GUNR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7979
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GUNR Sortino Ratio Rank: 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
GUNR Omega Ratio Rank: 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
GUNR Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
GUNR Martin Ratio Rank: 8888
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EWT vs. GUNR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Taiwan ETF (EWT) and FlexShares Morningstar Global Upstream Natural Resources Index Fund (GUNR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


EWTGUNRDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.18

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.09

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.55

1.38

+0.17

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

8.53

4.40

+4.13

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

25.15

16.53

+8.62

EWT vs. GUNR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EWT Sharpe Ratio is 3.36, which is higher than the GUNR Sharpe Ratio of 2.18. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EWT and GUNR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

EWT vs. GUNR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EWT drawdown since its inception was -64.37%, which is greater than GUNR's maximum drawdown of -45.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EWT and GUNR.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EWTGUNRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-64.37%

-45.64%

-18.73%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.51%

-7.77%

-2.74%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-25.66%

-19.59%

-6.07%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-38.88%

-24.06%

-14.82%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-38.88%

-43.04%

+4.16%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.19%

-5.39%

+1.20%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-19.21%

-10.39%

-8.82%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.56%

2.06%

+1.50%

Volatility

EWT vs. GUNR - Volatility Comparison

iShares MSCI Taiwan ETF (EWT) has a higher volatility of 13.55% compared to FlexShares Morningstar Global Upstream Natural Resources Index Fund (GUNR) at 5.11%. This indicates that EWT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GUNR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EWTGUNRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

13.55%

5.11%

+8.44%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

22.68%

13.13%

+9.55%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

26.75%

15.69%

+11.06%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.95%

19.06%

+3.89%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.78%

20.44%

+1.34%

EWT vs. GUNR - Expense Ratio Comparison

EWT has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is higher than GUNR's 0.46% expense ratio.


Dividends

EWT vs. GUNR - Dividend Comparison

EWT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.74%, more than GUNR's 2.31% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EWT
iShares MSCI Taiwan ETF
2.74%4.43%3.32%8.12%18.82%0.55%1.83%2.49%3.16%2.81%2.39%3.12%
GUNR
FlexShares Morningstar Global Upstream Natural Resources Index Fund
2.31%2.81%3.39%3.55%4.12%3.61%2.79%3.25%3.27%2.00%1.73%4.50%

Frequently Asked Questions


EWT and GUNR have a correlation of 0.36, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

EWT has higher volatility (13.55%) compared to GUNR (5.11%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EWT dropped -64.37% vs GUNR's -45.64%.

On 10-year performance, EWT leads with 19.56% vs 11.10% for GUNR. On fees, GUNR is cheaper at 0.46% per year. On volatility, GUNR has been the lower-risk option at 5.11%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, EWT has performed better with a 19.56% return vs 11.10%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

GUNR is cheaper with a 0.46% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for EWT.

EWT has the higher dividend yield at 2.74%, compared with 2.31% for GUNR.

EWT is categorized as Asia Pacific Equities, while GUNR is Commodity Producers Equities. EWT tracks MSCI Taiwan Index, while GUNR tracks Morningstar Global Upstream Natural Resources Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Northern Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for EWT and 0.46% for GUNR.

EWT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.36 vs 2.18), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EWT and GUNR

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer