PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EWT vs. EIRL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EWT vs. EIRL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares MSCI Taiwan ETF (EWT) and iShares MSCI Ireland ETF (EIRL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EWT achieves a 68.27% return, which is significantly higher than EIRL's 3.82% return. Over the past 10 years, EWT has outperformed EIRL with an annualized return of 19.90%, while EIRL has yielded a comparatively lower 8.09% annualized return.


EWT

1D
-0.20%
1M
18.24%
YTD
68.27%
6M
72.42%
1Y
110.37%
3Y*
38.34%
5Y*
18.33%
10Y*
19.90%

EIRL

1D
-0.80%
1M
5.57%
YTD
3.82%
6M
5.87%
1Y
19.14%
3Y*
13.07%
5Y*
6.56%
10Y*
8.09%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EWT vs. EIRL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
EWT
iShares MSCI Taiwan ETF
68.27%28.38%16.11%23.97%-28.90%26.18%31.50%33.36%-9.90%26.81%
EIRL
iShares MSCI Ireland ETF
3.82%28.82%-1.64%35.13%-18.83%13.72%9.63%28.15%-21.92%29.82%

Correlation

The correlation between EWT and EIRL is 0.49, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.49

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.52

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.56

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.54

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 12, 2010

0.50

The correlation between EWT and EIRL has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.49 to 0.56 - a consistent structural relationship.

EWT vs. EIRL - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
EWT
EIRL

Technology

72.9%
0.3%

Financial Services

13.0%
34.0%

Industrials

4.9%
24.8%

Basic Materials

3.5%
0.5%

Consumer Cyclical

1.9%
8.8%

Communication Services

1.9%

-

Consumer Defensive

1.1%
14.6%

Healthcare

0.8%
10.2%

Energy

-

4.8%

Real Estate

-

2.1%

Utilities

-

-

Technology

EWT
72.9%
EIRL
0.3%

Financial Services

EWT
13.0%
EIRL
34.0%

Industrials

EWT
4.9%
EIRL
24.8%

Basic Materials

EWT
3.5%
EIRL
0.5%

Consumer Cyclical

EWT
1.9%
EIRL
8.8%

Communication Services

EWT
1.9%
EIRL

-

Consumer Defensive

EWT
1.1%
EIRL
14.6%

Healthcare

EWT
0.8%
EIRL
10.2%

Energy

EWT

-

EIRL
4.8%

Real Estate

EWT

-

EIRL
2.1%

Utilities

EWT

-

EIRL

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EWT vs. EIRL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EWT
EWT Risk / Return Rank: 9595
Overall Rank
EWT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EWT Sortino Ratio Rank: 9494
Sortino Ratio Rank
EWT Omega Ratio Rank: 9494
Omega Ratio Rank
EWT Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
EWT Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank

EIRL
EIRL Risk / Return Rank: 2929
Overall Rank
EIRL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2929
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EIRL Sortino Ratio Rank: 3030
Sortino Ratio Rank
EIRL Omega Ratio Rank: 2929
Omega Ratio Rank
EIRL Calmar Ratio Rank: 2727
Calmar Ratio Rank
EIRL Martin Ratio Rank: 3030
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EWT vs. EIRL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Taiwan ETF (EWT) and iShares MSCI Ireland ETF (EIRL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


EWTEIRLDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

4.42

1.07

+3.36

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

5.00

1.62

+3.38

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.69

1.20

+0.49

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

10.56

1.35

+9.21

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

32.40

4.41

+27.98

EWT vs. EIRL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EWT Sharpe Ratio is 4.42, which is higher than the EIRL Sharpe Ratio of 1.07. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EWT and EIRL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


EWTEIRLDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.42

1.07

+3.36

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.82

0.31

+0.50

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.92

0.37

+0.55

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.26

0.43

-0.17

Drawdowns

EWT vs. EIRL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EWT drawdown since its inception was -64.37%, which is greater than EIRL's maximum drawdown of -46.48%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EWT and EIRL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EWTEIRLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-64.37%

-46.48%

-17.89%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.51%

-14.28%

+3.77%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-25.66%

-23.04%

-2.62%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-38.88%

-40.14%

+1.26%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-38.88%

-46.48%

+7.60%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.20%

-1.03%

+0.83%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-19.23%

-9.11%

-10.12%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.42%

4.35%

-0.93%

Volatility

EWT vs. EIRL - Volatility Comparison

iShares MSCI Taiwan ETF (EWT) has a higher volatility of 10.43% compared to iShares MSCI Ireland ETF (EIRL) at 5.72%. This indicates that EWT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EIRL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EWTEIRLDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.43%

5.72%

+4.71%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

20.52%

14.82%

+5.70%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

25.10%

18.03%

+7.07%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.59%

21.17%

+1.42%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.60%

21.76%

-0.16%

EWT vs. EIRL - Expense Ratio Comparison

EWT has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is higher than EIRL's 0.49% expense ratio.


Dividends

EWT vs. EIRL - Dividend Comparison

EWT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.63%, which matches EIRL's 2.61% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EIRL
iShares MSCI Ireland ETF
2.61%2.71%2.56%1.00%1.13%0.82%0.50%2.11%1.52%1.44%1.34%1.70%
EWT
iShares MSCI Taiwan ETF
2.63%4.43%3.32%8.12%18.82%0.55%1.83%2.49%3.16%2.81%2.39%3.12%

Frequently Asked Questions


EWT and EIRL have a correlation of 0.49, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

EWT has higher volatility (10.43%) compared to EIRL (5.72%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EWT dropped -64.37% vs EIRL's -46.48%.

On 10-year performance, EWT leads with 19.90% vs 8.09% for EIRL. On fees, EIRL is cheaper at 0.49% per year. On volatility, EIRL has been the lower-risk option at 5.72%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, EWT has performed better with a 19.90% return vs 8.09%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

EIRL is cheaper with a 0.49% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for EWT.

EWT has the higher dividend yield at 2.63%, compared with 2.61% for EIRL.

EWT is categorized as Asia Pacific Equities, while EIRL is Europe Equities. EWT tracks MSCI Taiwan Index, while EIRL tracks MSCI Ireland Investable Market 25/50 Index. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for EWT and 0.49% for EIRL.

EWT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.42 vs 1.07), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EWT and EIRL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer