EWT vs. COPX
EWT (iShares MSCI Taiwan ETF) and COPX (Global X Copper Miners ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - EWT is a Asia Pacific Equities fund tracking the MSCI Taiwan Index, while COPX is a Materials fund tracking the Solactive Global Copper Miners Total Return Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, EWT returned 19.56%/yr vs 21.86%/yr for COPX. A 0.59 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. EWT charges 0.59%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for COPX.
Performance
EWT vs. COPX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EWT achieves a 61.53% return, which is significantly higher than COPX's 19.75% return. Over the past 10 years, EWT has underperformed COPX with an annualized return of 19.56%, while COPX has yielded a comparatively higher 21.86% annualized return.
EWT
- 1D
- 0.17%
- 1M
- 8.18%
- YTD
- 61.53%
- 6M
- 67.45%
- 1Y
- 89.17%
- 3Y*
- 34.98%
- 5Y*
- 17.48%
- 10Y*
- 19.56%
COPX
- 1D
- 3.38%
- 1M
- -6.46%
- YTD
- 19.75%
- 6M
- 29.13%
- 1Y
- 103.76%
- 3Y*
- 33.96%
- 5Y*
- 19.28%
- 10Y*
- 21.86%
EWT vs. COPX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EWT iShares MSCI Taiwan ETF | 61.53% | 28.38% | 16.11% | 23.97% | -28.90% | 26.18% | 31.50% | 33.36% | -9.90% | 26.81% |
COPX Global X Copper Miners ETF | 19.75% | 93.50% | 3.57% | 8.38% | -0.76% | 23.39% | 51.66% | 12.48% | -31.31% | 38.92% |
Correlation
The correlation between EWT and COPX is 0.56, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.56 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.55 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.56 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.57 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 20, 2010 | 0.59 |
The correlation between EWT and COPX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.55 to 0.59 - a consistent structural relationship.
EWT vs. COPX - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
EWT
COPX
Technology
-
Financial Services
-
Industrials
Basic Materials
Consumer Cyclical
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Healthcare
-
Energy
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Technology
EWT
COPX
-
Financial Services
EWT
COPX
-
Industrials
EWT
COPX
Basic Materials
EWT
COPX
Consumer Cyclical
EWT
COPX
-
Communication Services
EWT
COPX
-
Consumer Defensive
EWT
COPX
-
Healthcare
EWT
COPX
-
Energy
EWT
-
COPX
-
Real Estate
EWT
-
COPX
-
Utilities
EWT
-
COPX
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EWT vs. COPX — Risk / Return Rank
EWT
COPX
EWT vs. COPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Taiwan ETF (EWT) and Global X Copper Miners ETF (COPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| EWT | COPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.97 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.18 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.55 | 1.36 | +0.19 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 8.53 | 3.75 | +4.78 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 25.15 | 11.60 | +13.54 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
EWT vs. COPX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EWT drawdown since its inception was -64.37%, smaller than the maximum COPX drawdown of -83.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EWT and COPX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EWT | COPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -64.37% | -83.16% | +18.79% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.51% | -27.82% | +17.31% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -25.66% | -39.72% | +14.06% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -38.88% | -42.12% | +3.24% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -38.88% | -65.41% | +26.53% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.19% | -10.17% | +5.98% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -19.21% | -39.28% | +20.07% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.56% | 8.98% | -5.42% |
Volatility
EWT vs. COPX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares MSCI Taiwan ETF (EWT) is 13.55%, while Global X Copper Miners ETF (COPX) has a volatility of 19.30%. This indicates that EWT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than COPX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EWT | COPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 13.55% | 19.30% | -5.75% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 22.68% | 38.15% | -15.47% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 26.75% | 43.66% | -16.91% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.95% | 37.00% | -14.05% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.78% | 35.75% | -13.97% |
EWT vs. COPX - Expense Ratio Comparison
EWT has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is lower than COPX's 0.65% expense ratio.
Dividends
EWT vs. COPX - Dividend Comparison
EWT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.74%, more than COPX's 2.24% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
COPX Global X Copper Miners ETF | 2.24% | 2.68% | 1.80% | 2.39% | 3.14% | 1.48% | 1.30% | 1.37% | 2.59% | 1.57% | 0.60% | 1.20% |
EWT iShares MSCI Taiwan ETF | 2.74% | 4.43% | 3.32% | 8.12% | 18.82% | 0.55% | 1.83% | 2.49% | 3.16% | 2.81% | 2.39% | 3.12% |
Frequently Asked Questions
EWT and COPX have a correlation of 0.56, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
COPX has higher volatility (19.30%) compared to EWT (13.55%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EWT dropped -64.37% vs COPX's -83.16%.
On 10-year performance, COPX leads with 21.86% vs 19.56% for EWT. On fees, EWT is cheaper at 0.59% per year. On volatility, EWT has been the lower-risk option at 13.55%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, COPX has performed better with a 21.86% return vs 19.56%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
EWT is cheaper with a 0.59% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for COPX.
EWT has the higher dividend yield at 2.74%, compared with 2.24% for COPX.
EWT is categorized as Asia Pacific Equities, while COPX is Materials. EWT tracks MSCI Taiwan Index, while COPX tracks Solactive Global Copper Miners Total Return Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for EWT and 0.65% for COPX.
EWT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.36 vs 2.39), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for EWT and COPX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer