PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EWQ vs. SMH
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EWQ vs. SMH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares MSCI France ETF (EWQ) and VanEck Semiconductor ETF (SMH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EWQ achieves a 1.24% return, which is significantly lower than SMH's 66.10% return. Over the past 10 years, EWQ has underperformed SMH with an annualized return of 9.55%, while SMH has yielded a comparatively higher 36.92% annualized return.


EWQ

1D
0.42%
1M
-0.46%
YTD
1.24%
6M
2.53%
1Y
8.79%
3Y*
9.62%
5Y*
6.16%
10Y*
9.55%

SMH

1D
5.00%
1M
5.58%
YTD
66.10%
6M
62.81%
1Y
137.42%
3Y*
60.43%
5Y*
37.89%
10Y*
36.92%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EWQ vs. SMH - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
EWQ
iShares MSCI France ETF
1.24%28.90%-5.63%21.71%-12.05%21.43%2.86%26.69%-12.90%29.11%
SMH
VanEck Semiconductor ETF
66.10%49.17%39.10%73.38%-33.53%42.13%55.53%64.45%-9.05%38.48%

Correlation

The correlation between EWQ and SMH is 0.47, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.47

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.45

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.54

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.54

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 5, 2000

0.53

The correlation between EWQ and SMH has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.45 to 0.54 - a consistent structural relationship.

EWQ vs. SMH - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
EWQ
SMH

Industrials

31.7%

-

Financial Services

12.8%

-

Consumer Cyclical

12.0%

-

Healthcare

8.4%

-

Consumer Defensive

8.3%

-

Energy

8.0%

-

Basic Materials

7.0%

-

Technology

4.1%
100.0%

Communication Services

3.0%

-

Utilities

2.6%

-

Real Estate

1.4%

-

Industrials

EWQ
31.7%
SMH

-

Financial Services

EWQ
12.8%
SMH

-

Consumer Cyclical

EWQ
12.0%
SMH

-

Healthcare

EWQ
8.4%
SMH

-

Consumer Defensive

EWQ
8.3%
SMH

-

Energy

EWQ
8.0%
SMH

-

Basic Materials

EWQ
7.0%
SMH

-

Technology

EWQ
4.1%
SMH
100.0%

Communication Services

EWQ
3.0%
SMH

-

Utilities

EWQ
2.6%
SMH

-

Real Estate

EWQ
1.4%
SMH

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EWQ vs. SMH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EWQ
EWQ Risk / Return Rank: 1818
Overall Rank
EWQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1818
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EWQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 1818
Sortino Ratio Rank
EWQ Omega Ratio Rank: 1818
Omega Ratio Rank
EWQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 1818
Calmar Ratio Rank
EWQ Martin Ratio Rank: 1919
Martin Ratio Rank

SMH
SMH Risk / Return Rank: 9696
Overall Rank
SMH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SMH Sortino Ratio Rank: 9393
Sortino Ratio Rank
SMH Omega Ratio Rank: 9494
Omega Ratio Rank
SMH Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
SMH Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EWQ vs. SMH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI France ETF (EWQ) and VanEck Semiconductor ETF (SMH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


EWQSMHDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-3.76

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-3.50

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.10

1.62

-0.52

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.64

9.26

-8.62

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.96

34.80

-32.84

EWQ vs. SMH - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EWQ Sharpe Ratio is 0.51, which is lower than the SMH Sharpe Ratio of 4.27. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EWQ and SMH, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


EWQSMHDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.51

4.27

-3.76

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.31

1.08

-0.77

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.46

1.13

-0.67

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.27

0.33

-0.06

Drawdowns

EWQ vs. SMH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EWQ drawdown since its inception was -61.41%, smaller than the maximum SMH drawdown of -84.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EWQ and SMH.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EWQSMHDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-61.41%

-84.96%

+23.55%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.80%

-14.93%

+1.13%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.16%

-35.74%

+20.58%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-31.46%

-45.30%

+13.84%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-39.23%

-45.30%

+6.07%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.79%

-6.23%

+0.44%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-16.07%

-41.07%

+25.00%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.50%

3.96%

+0.54%

Volatility

EWQ vs. SMH - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares MSCI France ETF (EWQ) is 5.24%, while VanEck Semiconductor ETF (SMH) has a volatility of 15.45%. This indicates that EWQ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SMH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EWQSMHDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.24%

15.45%

-10.21%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.76%

26.71%

-12.95%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.37%

32.42%

-15.05%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.81%

35.32%

-15.51%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.82%

32.75%

-11.93%

EWQ vs. SMH - Expense Ratio Comparison

EWQ has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than SMH's 0.35% expense ratio.


Dividends

EWQ vs. SMH - Dividend Comparison

EWQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.60%, more than SMH's 0.18% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EWQ
iShares MSCI France ETF
2.60%2.63%3.31%2.73%3.23%3.79%1.02%2.44%2.90%1.90%2.84%2.25%
SMH
VanEck Semiconductor ETF
0.18%0.31%0.44%0.60%1.18%0.51%0.69%1.50%1.88%1.43%0.80%2.14%

Frequently Asked Questions


EWQ and SMH have a correlation of 0.47, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SMH has higher volatility (15.45%) compared to EWQ (5.24%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EWQ dropped -61.41% vs SMH's -84.96%.

On 10-year performance, SMH leads with 36.92% vs 9.55% for EWQ. On fees, SMH is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, EWQ has been the lower-risk option at 5.24%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, SMH has performed better with a 36.92% return vs 9.55%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SMH is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for EWQ.

EWQ has the higher dividend yield at 2.60%, compared with 0.18% for SMH.

EWQ is categorized as Europe Equities, while SMH is Semiconductors. EWQ tracks MSCI France Index, while SMH tracks MVIS US Listed Semiconductor 25 Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for EWQ and 0.35% for SMH.

SMH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.27 vs 0.51), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EWQ and SMH

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer