EWQ vs. SMH
EWQ (iShares MSCI France ETF) and SMH (VanEck Semiconductor ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - EWQ is a Europe Equities fund tracking the MSCI France Index, while SMH is a Semiconductors fund tracking the MVIS US Listed Semiconductor 25 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, EWQ returned 9.55%/yr vs 36.92%/yr for SMH. A 0.53 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. EWQ charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for SMH.
Performance
EWQ vs. SMH - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EWQ achieves a 1.24% return, which is significantly lower than SMH's 66.10% return. Over the past 10 years, EWQ has underperformed SMH with an annualized return of 9.55%, while SMH has yielded a comparatively higher 36.92% annualized return.
EWQ
- 1D
- 0.42%
- 1M
- -0.46%
- YTD
- 1.24%
- 6M
- 2.53%
- 1Y
- 8.79%
- 3Y*
- 9.62%
- 5Y*
- 6.16%
- 10Y*
- 9.55%
SMH
- 1D
- 5.00%
- 1M
- 5.58%
- YTD
- 66.10%
- 6M
- 62.81%
- 1Y
- 137.42%
- 3Y*
- 60.43%
- 5Y*
- 37.89%
- 10Y*
- 36.92%
EWQ vs. SMH - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EWQ iShares MSCI France ETF | 1.24% | 28.90% | -5.63% | 21.71% | -12.05% | 21.43% | 2.86% | 26.69% | -12.90% | 29.11% |
SMH VanEck Semiconductor ETF | 66.10% | 49.17% | 39.10% | 73.38% | -33.53% | 42.13% | 55.53% | 64.45% | -9.05% | 38.48% |
Correlation
The correlation between EWQ and SMH is 0.47, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.47 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.45 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.54 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.54 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 5, 2000 | 0.53 |
The correlation between EWQ and SMH has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.45 to 0.54 - a consistent structural relationship.
EWQ vs. SMH - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
EWQ
SMH
Industrials
-
Financial Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Healthcare
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Basic Materials
-
Technology
Communication Services
-
Utilities
-
Real Estate
-
Industrials
EWQ
SMH
-
Financial Services
EWQ
SMH
-
Consumer Cyclical
EWQ
SMH
-
Healthcare
EWQ
SMH
-
Consumer Defensive
EWQ
SMH
-
Energy
EWQ
SMH
-
Basic Materials
EWQ
SMH
-
Technology
EWQ
SMH
Communication Services
EWQ
SMH
-
Utilities
EWQ
SMH
-
Real Estate
EWQ
SMH
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EWQ vs. SMH — Risk / Return Rank
EWQ
SMH
EWQ vs. SMH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI France ETF (EWQ) and VanEck Semiconductor ETF (SMH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| EWQ | SMH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -3.76 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.50 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.10 | 1.62 | -0.52 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.64 | 9.26 | -8.62 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.96 | 34.80 | -32.84 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| EWQ | SMH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.51 | 4.27 | -3.76 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.31 | 1.08 | -0.77 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.46 | 1.13 | -0.67 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.27 | 0.33 | -0.06 |
Drawdowns
EWQ vs. SMH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EWQ drawdown since its inception was -61.41%, smaller than the maximum SMH drawdown of -84.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EWQ and SMH.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EWQ | SMH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -61.41% | -84.96% | +23.55% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.80% | -14.93% | +1.13% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.16% | -35.74% | +20.58% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -31.46% | -45.30% | +13.84% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -39.23% | -45.30% | +6.07% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.79% | -6.23% | +0.44% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -16.07% | -41.07% | +25.00% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.50% | 3.96% | +0.54% |
Volatility
EWQ vs. SMH - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares MSCI France ETF (EWQ) is 5.24%, while VanEck Semiconductor ETF (SMH) has a volatility of 15.45%. This indicates that EWQ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SMH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EWQ | SMH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.24% | 15.45% | -10.21% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.76% | 26.71% | -12.95% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.37% | 32.42% | -15.05% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.81% | 35.32% | -15.51% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.82% | 32.75% | -11.93% |
EWQ vs. SMH - Expense Ratio Comparison
EWQ has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than SMH's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
EWQ vs. SMH - Dividend Comparison
EWQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.60%, more than SMH's 0.18% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EWQ iShares MSCI France ETF | 2.60% | 2.63% | 3.31% | 2.73% | 3.23% | 3.79% | 1.02% | 2.44% | 2.90% | 1.90% | 2.84% | 2.25% |
SMH VanEck Semiconductor ETF | 0.18% | 0.31% | 0.44% | 0.60% | 1.18% | 0.51% | 0.69% | 1.50% | 1.88% | 1.43% | 0.80% | 2.14% |
Frequently Asked Questions
EWQ and SMH have a correlation of 0.47, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SMH has higher volatility (15.45%) compared to EWQ (5.24%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EWQ dropped -61.41% vs SMH's -84.96%.
On 10-year performance, SMH leads with 36.92% vs 9.55% for EWQ. On fees, SMH is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, EWQ has been the lower-risk option at 5.24%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, SMH has performed better with a 36.92% return vs 9.55%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SMH is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for EWQ.
EWQ has the higher dividend yield at 2.60%, compared with 0.18% for SMH.
EWQ is categorized as Europe Equities, while SMH is Semiconductors. EWQ tracks MSCI France Index, while SMH tracks MVIS US Listed Semiconductor 25 Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for EWQ and 0.35% for SMH.
SMH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.27 vs 0.51), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for EWQ and SMH
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer