PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EWP vs. EWO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EWP vs. EWO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares MSCI Spain ETF (EWP) and iShares MSCI Austria ETF (EWO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EWP achieves a 5.49% return, which is significantly lower than EWO's 14.52% return. Over the past 10 years, EWP has underperformed EWO with an annualized return of 10.99%, while EWO has yielded a comparatively higher 14.00% annualized return.


EWP

1D
-1.06%
1M
3.64%
YTD
5.49%
6M
10.02%
1Y
34.73%
3Y*
30.89%
5Y*
17.03%
10Y*
10.99%

EWO

1D
-1.79%
1M
5.62%
YTD
14.52%
6M
21.29%
1Y
43.71%
3Y*
33.18%
5Y*
14.75%
10Y*
14.00%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EWP vs. EWO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
EWP
iShares MSCI Spain ETF
5.49%78.03%5.70%30.26%-5.18%0.25%-3.94%11.93%-15.32%26.98%
EWO
iShares MSCI Austria ETF
14.52%74.21%4.05%20.63%-21.95%31.50%-3.67%17.05%-22.88%52.47%

Correlation

The correlation between EWP and EWO is 0.76, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.76

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.74

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.77

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.76

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 2, 1996

0.62

The correlation between EWP and EWO shifts across timeframes, from 0.62 (all time) to 0.77 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

EWP vs. EWO - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
EWP
EWO

Financial Services

41.4%
46.6%

Utilities

21.2%
7.5%

Industrials

16.1%
14.2%

Energy

5.3%
10.8%

Technology

4.9%
6.6%

Consumer Cyclical

4.0%
1.9%

Communication Services

2.9%

-

Real Estate

2.9%
4.4%

Healthcare

1.3%

-

Basic Materials

-

8.1%

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Financial Services

EWP
41.4%
EWO
46.6%

Utilities

EWP
21.2%
EWO
7.5%

Industrials

EWP
16.1%
EWO
14.2%

Energy

EWP
5.3%
EWO
10.8%

Technology

EWP
4.9%
EWO
6.6%

Consumer Cyclical

EWP
4.0%
EWO
1.9%

Communication Services

EWP
2.9%
EWO

-

Real Estate

EWP
2.9%
EWO
4.4%

Healthcare

EWP
1.3%
EWO

-

Basic Materials

EWP

-

EWO
8.1%

Consumer Defensive

EWP

-

EWO

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EWP vs. EWO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EWP
EWP Risk / Return Rank: 5555
Overall Rank
EWP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5454
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EWP Sortino Ratio Rank: 5151
Sortino Ratio Rank
EWP Omega Ratio Rank: 5151
Omega Ratio Rank
EWP Calmar Ratio Rank: 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
EWP Martin Ratio Rank: 6060
Martin Ratio Rank

EWO
EWO Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
EWO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7272
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EWO Sortino Ratio Rank: 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
EWO Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
EWO Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
EWO Martin Ratio Rank: 5959
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EWP vs. EWO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Spain ETF (EWP) and iShares MSCI Austria ETF (EWO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


EWPEWODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.51

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.76

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.33

1.40

-0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.07

3.12

-0.05

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.91

10.58

+0.33

EWP vs. EWO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EWP Sharpe Ratio is 1.87, which is comparable to the EWO Sharpe Ratio of 2.38. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EWP and EWO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


EWPEWODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.87

2.38

-0.51

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.85

0.68

+0.17

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.50

0.61

-0.12

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.31

0.27

+0.04

Drawdowns

EWP vs. EWO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EWP drawdown since its inception was -61.19%, smaller than the maximum EWO drawdown of -75.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EWP and EWO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EWPEWODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-61.19%

-75.69%

+14.50%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.38%

-14.08%

+2.70%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.19%

-16.75%

+4.56%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-33.91%

-41.82%

+7.91%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-46.36%

-58.10%

+11.74%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.60%

-1.79%

-0.81%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-21.43%

-28.12%

+6.69%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.19%

4.14%

-0.95%

Volatility

EWP vs. EWO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares MSCI Spain ETF (EWP) is 6.12%, while iShares MSCI Austria ETF (EWO) has a volatility of 6.71%. This indicates that EWP experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EWO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EWPEWODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.12%

6.71%

-0.59%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.64%

15.08%

+0.56%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.76%

18.52%

+0.24%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.24%

21.84%

-1.60%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.23%

22.86%

-0.63%

EWP vs. EWO - Expense Ratio Comparison

EWP has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than EWO's 0.49% expense ratio.


Dividends

EWP vs. EWO - Dividend Comparison

EWP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.15%, more than EWO's 2.08% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EWO
iShares MSCI Austria ETF
2.08%2.38%7.40%5.66%4.75%2.42%0.98%3.11%4.04%2.03%1.99%1.51%
EWP
iShares MSCI Spain ETF
2.15%2.27%4.35%2.70%3.07%3.29%2.56%3.72%3.69%2.72%4.65%3.85%

Frequently Asked Questions


EWP and EWO have a correlation of 0.76, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

EWO has higher volatility (6.71%) compared to EWP (6.12%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EWP dropped -61.19% vs EWO's -75.69%.

On 10-year performance, EWO leads with 14.00% vs 10.99% for EWP. On fees, EWO is cheaper at 0.49% per year. On volatility, EWP has been the lower-risk option at 6.12%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, EWO has performed better with a 14.00% return vs 10.99%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

EWO is cheaper with a 0.49% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for EWP.

EWP has the higher dividend yield at 2.15%, compared with 2.08% for EWO.

EWP tracks MSCI Spain Index, while EWO tracks MSCI Austria Investable Market Index. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for EWP and 0.49% for EWO.

EWO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.38 vs 1.87), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EWP and EWO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer