EWO vs. FLGB

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

EWO (iShares MSCI Austria ETF) and FLGB (Franklin FTSE United Kingdom ETF) are both Europe Equities funds - EWO tracks the MSCI Austria Investable Market Index while FLGB tracks the FTSE UK RIC Capped Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, EWO returned 17.04%/yr vs 10.74%/yr for FLGB. A 0.71 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. EWO charges 0.49%/yr vs 0.09%/yr for FLGB.

Performance

EWO vs. FLGB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares MSCI Austria ETF (EWO) and Franklin FTSE United Kingdom ETF (FLGB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EWO achieves a 22.29% return, which is significantly higher than FLGB's 4.59% return.

EWO

• 1D: -1.46%
• 1M: 8.63%
• YTD: 22.29%
• 6M: 23.55%
• 1Y: 54.33%
• 3Y*: 35.93%
• 5Y*: 17.04%
• 10Y*: 15.85%

FLGB

• 1D: -0.45%
• 1M: -1.81%
• YTD: 4.59%
• 6M: 4.84%
• 1Y: 18.93%
• 3Y*: 17.39%
• 5Y*: 10.74%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EWO vs. FLGB - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
EWO iShares MSCI Austria ETF	22.29%	74.21%	4.05%	20.63%	-21.95%	31.50%	-3.67%	17.05%	-22.88%	4.17%
FLGB Franklin FTSE United Kingdom ETF	4.59%	33.73%	8.77%	14.33%	-6.00%	17.14%	-9.47%	23.23%	-11.60%	1.12%

Correlation

The correlation between EWO and FLGB is 0.62, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.62
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.68
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.74
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 6, 2017	0.71

The correlation between EWO and FLGB shifts across timeframes, from 0.62 (1 year) to 0.74 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

EWO vs. FLGB - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	EWO	FLGB
Financial Services	47.3%	27.1%
Industrials	14.5%	13.3%
Energy	9.7%	10.2%
Basic Materials	8.8%	8.8%
Utilities	6.5%	4.7%
Technology	5.7%	0.6%
Real Estate	4.1%	0.8%
Consumer Cyclical	3.6%	4.8%
Communication Services	-	2.5%
Consumer Defensive	-	13.9%
Healthcare	-	12.9%

Return for Risk

EWO vs. FLGB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EWO

EWO Risk / Return Rank: 83
EWO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 89
EWO Sortino Ratio Rank: 89
EWO Omega Ratio Rank: 84
EWO Calmar Ratio Rank: 78
EWO Martin Ratio Rank: 74

FLGB

FLGB Risk / Return Rank: 39
FLGB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 38
FLGB Sortino Ratio Rank: 39
FLGB Omega Ratio Rank: 37
FLGB Calmar Ratio Rank: 39
FLGB Martin Ratio Rank: 42

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EWO vs. FLGB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Austria ETF (EWO) and Franklin FTSE United Kingdom ETF (FLGB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	EWO	FLGB	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.83	1.32	+1.51
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.87	1.91	+1.96
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.48	1.24	+0.24
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.88	1.85	+2.02
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	13.13	6.43	+6.70

EWO vs. FLGB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EWO Sharpe Ratio is 2.83, which is higher than the FLGB Sharpe Ratio of 1.32. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EWO and FLGB, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

EWO vs. FLGB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EWO drawdown since its inception was -75.69%, which is greater than FLGB's maximum drawdown of -42.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EWO and FLGB.

Drawdown Indicators

	EWO	FLGB	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-75.69%	-42.61%	-33.08%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-14.08%	-10.26%	-3.82%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-16.75%	-13.13%	-3.62%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-41.82%	-25.90%	-15.92%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-58.10%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.46%	-5.18%	+3.72%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-28.07%	-6.67%	-21.40%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.15%	2.95%	+1.20%

Volatility

EWO vs. FLGB - Volatility Comparison

iShares MSCI Austria ETF (EWO) has a higher volatility of 7.60% compared to Franklin FTSE United Kingdom ETF (FLGB) at 4.15%. This indicates that EWO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FLGB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	EWO	FLGB	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	7.60%	4.15%	+3.45%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	16.15%	12.36%	+3.79%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	19.32%	14.49%	+4.83%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	21.98%	16.63%	+5.35%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	22.65%	18.95%	+3.70%

EWO vs. FLGB - Expense Ratio Comparison

EWO has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is higher than FLGB's 0.09% expense ratio.

Dividends

EWO vs. FLGB - Dividend Comparison

EWO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.98%, more than FLGB's 1.68% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
EWO iShares MSCI Austria ETF	1.98%	2.38%	7.40%	5.66%	4.75%	2.42%	0.98%	3.11%	4.04%	2.03%	1.99%	1.51%
FLGB Franklin FTSE United Kingdom ETF	1.68%	3.50%	4.42%	3.95%	4.23%	2.93%	2.67%	4.30%	3.92%	0.43%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both EWO and FLGB in my portfolio?

EWO and FLGB have a correlation of 0.62, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, EWO or FLGB?

EWO has higher volatility (7.60%) compared to FLGB (4.15%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EWO dropped -75.69% vs FLGB's -42.61%.

Which ETF is better, EWO or FLGB?

On 5-year performance, EWO leads with 17.04% vs 10.74% for FLGB. On fees, FLGB is cheaper at 0.09% per year. On volatility, FLGB has been the lower-risk option at 4.15%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, EWO or FLGB?

Over the 5-year period, EWO has performed better with a 17.04% return vs 10.74%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, EWO or FLGB?

FLGB is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for EWO.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, EWO or FLGB?

EWO has the higher dividend yield at 1.98%, compared with 1.68% for FLGB.

What is the main difference between EWO and FLGB?

EWO tracks MSCI Austria Investable Market Index, while FLGB tracks FTSE UK RIC Capped Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Franklin Templeton. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for EWO and 0.09% for FLGB.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

EWO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.83 vs 1.32), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.