PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EWO vs. FLGB
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

EWO vs. FLGB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares MSCI Austria ETF (EWO) and Franklin FTSE United Kingdom ETF (FLGB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

EWO vs. FLGB - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
EWO
iShares MSCI Austria ETF
0.79%74.21%4.05%20.63%-21.95%31.50%-3.67%17.05%-22.88%4.30%
FLGB
Franklin FTSE United Kingdom ETF
4.30%33.73%8.77%14.33%-6.00%17.14%-9.47%23.23%-11.60%1.12%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EWO achieves a 0.79% return, which is significantly lower than FLGB's 4.30% return.


EWO

1D
-0.78%
1M
-0.33%
YTD
0.79%
6M
13.93%
1Y
46.27%
3Y*
26.94%
5Y*
14.98%
10Y*
12.46%

FLGB

1D
-0.34%
1M
-1.51%
YTD
4.30%
6M
10.24%
1Y
27.05%
3Y*
17.39%
5Y*
12.08%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


EWO vs. FLGB - Expense Ratio Comparison

EWO has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is higher than FLGB's 0.09% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

EWO vs. FLGB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EWO
EWO Risk / Return Rank: 9090
Overall Rank
EWO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EWO Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
EWO Omega Ratio Rank: 9191
Omega Ratio Rank
EWO Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
EWO Martin Ratio Rank: 8484
Martin Ratio Rank

FLGB
FLGB Risk / Return Rank: 7979
Overall Rank
FLGB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FLGB Sortino Ratio Rank: 8080
Sortino Ratio Rank
FLGB Omega Ratio Rank: 8080
Omega Ratio Rank
FLGB Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
FLGB Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EWO vs. FLGB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Austria ETF (EWO) and Franklin FTSE United Kingdom ETF (FLGB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


EWOFLGBDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.18

1.61

+0.57

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.85

2.18

+0.67

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.42

1.33

+0.09

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.28

2.31

+0.97

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

11.05

10.11

+0.95

EWO vs. FLGB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EWO Sharpe Ratio is 2.18, which is higher than the FLGB Sharpe Ratio of 1.61. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EWO and FLGB, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


EWOFLGBDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.18

1.61

+0.57

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.70

0.74

-0.04

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.55

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.26

0.42

-0.16

Correlation

The correlation between EWO and FLGB is 0.71, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

EWO vs. FLGB - Dividend Comparison

EWO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.37%, less than FLGB's 3.35% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EWO
iShares MSCI Austria ETF
2.37%2.38%7.40%5.66%4.75%2.42%0.98%3.11%4.04%2.03%1.99%1.51%
FLGB
Franklin FTSE United Kingdom ETF
3.35%3.50%4.42%3.95%4.23%2.93%2.67%4.30%3.92%0.43%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

EWO vs. FLGB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EWO drawdown since its inception was -75.69%, which is greater than FLGB's maximum drawdown of -42.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EWO and FLGB.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


EWOFLGBDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-75.69%

-42.61%

-33.08%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.08%

-11.21%

-2.87%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-41.82%

-25.90%

-15.92%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-58.10%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-8.87%

-5.45%

-3.42%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-28.27%

-6.75%

-21.52%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.18%

2.71%

+1.47%

Volatility

EWO vs. FLGB - Volatility Comparison

iShares MSCI Austria ETF (EWO) has a higher volatility of 8.09% compared to Franklin FTSE United Kingdom ETF (FLGB) at 6.61%. This indicates that EWO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FLGB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


EWOFLGBDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.09%

6.61%

+1.48%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.82%

10.28%

+3.54%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

21.34%

16.88%

+4.46%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.62%

16.47%

+5.15%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.78%

18.97%

+3.81%