PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
EWO vs. FLEE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

EWO vs. FLEE

Last updated Aug 2, 2026
Documentation

EWO (iShares MSCI Austria ETF) and FLEE (Franklin FTSE Europe ETF) are both Europe Equities funds - EWO tracks the MSCI Austria Investable Market Index while FLEE tracks the FTSE Developed Europe RIC Capped Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, EWO returned 17.22%/yr vs 9.49%/yr for FLEE. Their 0.78 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. EWO charges 0.49%/yr vs 0.09%/yr for FLEE.

Performance

EWO vs. FLEE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares MSCI Austria ETF (EWO) and Franklin FTSE Europe ETF (FLEE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EWO achieves a 22.21% return, which is significantly higher than FLEE's 9.38% return.

EWO

1D
-0.06%
1M
-0.38%
6M
15.38%
YTD
22.21%
1Y
47.85%
3Y*
33.11%
5Y*
17.22%
10Y*
15.04%
ALL TIME*
7.31%

FLEE

1D
-1.34%
1M
0.04%
6M
4.27%
YTD
9.38%
1Y
23.53%
3Y*
16.22%
5Y*
9.49%
10Y*
—
ALL TIME*
8.57%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)

EWO

iShares MSCI Austria ETF
$1.47M$2.78M$1.63M

FLEE

Franklin FTSE Europe ETF
$309.38K$221.20K$513.36K

EWO vs. FLEE - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
EWO
iShares MSCI Austria ETF		22.21%74.21%4.05%20.63%-21.95%31.50%-3.67%17.05%-22.88%4.17%
FLEE
Franklin FTSE Europe ETF		9.38%35.76%2.03%20.46%-15.22%16.84%5.33%24.41%-14.97%1.80%

Correlation

The correlation between EWO and FLEE is 0.74, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.74

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.75

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.79

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 6, 2017

0.78

The correlation between EWO and FLEE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.74 to 0.79 - a consistent structural relationship.

EWO vs. FLEE - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors
EWO
FLEE

Financial Services

48.1%
24.4%

Industrials

11.1%
19.4%

Energy

9.6%
4.4%

Basic Materials

9.4%
5.5%

Utilities

6.4%
4.8%

Technology

5.9%
9.8%

Consumer Cyclical

4.7%
6.7%

Real Estate

3.7%
1.0%

Communication Services

-

2.6%

Consumer Defensive

-

8.3%

Healthcare

-

12.9%

Financial Services

EWO
48.1%
FLEE
24.4%

Industrials

EWO
11.1%
FLEE
19.4%

Energy

EWO
9.6%
FLEE
4.4%

Basic Materials

EWO
9.4%
FLEE
5.5%

Utilities

EWO
6.4%
FLEE
4.8%

Technology

EWO
5.9%
FLEE
9.8%

Consumer Cyclical

EWO
4.7%
FLEE
6.7%

Real Estate

EWO
3.7%
FLEE
1.0%

Communication Services

EWO

-

FLEE
2.6%

Consumer Defensive

EWO

-

FLEE
8.3%

Healthcare

EWO

-

FLEE
12.9%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

iShares MSCI Austria ETF

Franklin FTSE Europe ETF

Often compared with EWO:
EWO vs. EWAEWO vs. EWQEWO vs. EWLEWO vs. EWGEWO vs. IBZL.LEWO vs. EEMEWO vs. VOO
Often compared with FLEE:
FLEE vs. SPEUFLEE vs. FLEHFLEE vs. VGKFLEE vs. FLEUFLEE vs. DBEUFLEE vs. FLGBFLEE vs. EWG

Return for Risk

EWO vs. FLEE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.
EWO
EWO Risk / Return Rank: 8989
Overall Rank
EWO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EWO Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
EWO Omega Ratio Rank: 8989
Omega Ratio Rank
EWO Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
EWO Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank
FLEE
FLEE Risk / Return Rank: 5454
Overall Rank
FLEE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5656
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FLEE Sortino Ratio Rank: 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
FLEE Omega Ratio Rank: 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
FLEE Calmar Ratio Rank: 4949
Calmar Ratio Rank
FLEE Martin Ratio Rank: 5555
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

EWO vs. FLEE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Austria ETF (EWO) and Franklin FTSE Europe ETF (FLEE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

EWOFLEEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
2.40
1.35

+1.04

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
3.39
1.98

+1.41

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.41

1.24

+0.17

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.38

1.76

+1.62

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.29

6.54

+4.75

EWO vs. FLEE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EWO Sharpe Ratio is 2.40, which is higher than the FLEE Sharpe Ratio of 1.35. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EWO and FLEE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Drawdowns

EWO vs. FLEE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EWO drawdown since its inception was -75.69%, which is greater than FLEE's maximum drawdown of -37.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EWO and FLEE.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

EWOFLEEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-75.69%

-37.27%

-38.42%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.08%

-12.37%

-1.71%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.75%

-14.59%

-2.16%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-41.82%

-31.62%

-10.20%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-58.10%

—

—

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.53%

-1.34%

-0.19%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-27.98%

-7.00%

-20.98%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.21%

3.33%

+0.88%

Volatility

EWO vs. FLEE - Volatility Comparison

iShares MSCI Austria ETF (EWO) has a higher volatility of 6.23% compared to Franklin FTSE Europe ETF (FLEE) at 4.51%. This indicates that EWO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FLEE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

EWOFLEEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.23%

4.51%

+1.72%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.88%

13.78%

+3.10%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.92%

16.13%

+3.79%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.03%

17.45%

+4.58%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.60%

18.91%

+3.69%

EWO vs. FLEE - Expense Ratio Comparison

EWO has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is higher than FLEE's 0.09% expense ratio.

Dividends

EWO vs. FLEE - Dividend Comparison

EWO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.98%, less than FLEE's 3.13% yield.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EWO
iShares MSCI Austria ETF		1.98%2.38%7.40%5.66%4.75%2.42%0.98%3.11%4.04%2.03%1.99%1.51%
FLEE
Franklin FTSE Europe ETF		3.13%2.76%3.93%2.57%3.48%3.61%1.88%3.02%3.85%0.02%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

EWO and FLEE have a correlation of 0.74, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

EWO has higher volatility (6.23%) compared to FLEE (4.51%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EWO dropped -75.69% vs FLEE's -37.27%.

On 5-year performance, EWO leads with 17.22% vs 9.49% for FLEE. On fees, FLEE is cheaper at 0.09% per year. On volatility, FLEE has been the lower-risk option at 4.51%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, EWO has performed better with a 17.22% return vs 9.49%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

FLEE is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for EWO.

FLEE has the higher dividend yield at 3.13%, compared with 1.98% for EWO.

EWO tracks MSCI Austria Investable Market Index, while FLEE tracks FTSE Developed Europe RIC Capped Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Franklin Templeton. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for EWO and 0.09% for FLEE.

EWO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.40 vs 1.35), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EWO and FLEE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer