EWO vs. COPJ

Last updated Jun 13, 2026

EWO (iShares MSCI Austria ETF) and COPJ (Sprott Junior Copper Miners ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - EWO is a Europe Equities fund tracking the MSCI Austria Investable Market Index, while COPJ is a Commodity Producers Equities fund tracking the Nasdaq Sprott Junior Copper Miners Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, EWO returned 33.19%/yr vs 41.69%/yr for COPJ. A 0.53 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. EWO charges 0.49%/yr vs 0.78%/yr for COPJ.

Performance

EWO vs. COPJ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares MSCI Austria ETF (EWO) and Sprott Junior Copper Miners ETF (COPJ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EWO achieves a 18.55% return, which is significantly higher than COPJ's 8.25% return.

EWO

• 1D: 1.37%
• 1M: 6.75%
• YTD: 18.55%
• 6M: 23.71%
• 1Y: 48.35%
• 3Y*: 33.19%
• 5Y*: 15.56%
• 10Y*: 15.10%

COPJ

• 1D: 4.06%
• 1M: -7.22%
• YTD: 8.25%
• 6M: 18.98%
• 1Y: 100.49%
• 3Y*: 41.69%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EWO vs. COPJ - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
EWO iShares MSCI Austria ETF	18.55%	74.21%	4.05%	7.00%
COPJ Sprott Junior Copper Miners ETF	8.25%	140.63%	11.07%	-6.47%

Correlation

The correlation between EWO and COPJ is 0.45, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.45
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.50
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 2, 2023	0.53

The correlation between EWO and COPJ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.45 to 0.53 - a consistent structural relationship.

EWO vs. COPJ - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	EWO	COPJ
Financial Services	46.5%	-
Industrials	14.3%	-
Basic Materials	10.5%	100.0%
Energy	9.5%	-
Utilities	6.4%	-
Technology	5.6%	3.6%
Real Estate	4.0%	-
Consumer Cyclical	1.7%	-
Communication Services	-	-
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Healthcare	-	-

Return for Risk

EWO vs. COPJ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EWO

EWO Risk / Return Rank: 79
EWO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 86
EWO Sortino Ratio Rank: 85
EWO Omega Ratio Rank: 79
EWO Calmar Ratio Rank: 74
EWO Martin Ratio Rank: 69

COPJ

COPJ Risk / Return Rank: 70
COPJ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 84
COPJ Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
COPJ Omega Ratio Rank: 72
COPJ Calmar Ratio Rank: 72
COPJ Martin Ratio Rank: 57

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EWO vs. COPJ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Austria ETF (EWO) and Sprott Junior Copper Miners ETF (COPJ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	EWO	COPJ	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.41	2.33	+0.08
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.35	2.62	+0.72
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.41	1.37	+0.04
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.28	3.21	+0.07
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	11.10	8.96	+2.13

EWO vs. COPJ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EWO Sharpe Ratio is 2.41, which is comparable to the COPJ Sharpe Ratio of 2.33. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EWO and COPJ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

EWO vs. COPJ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EWO drawdown since its inception was -75.69%, which is greater than COPJ's maximum drawdown of -32.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EWO and COPJ.

Drawdown Indicators

	EWO	COPJ	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-75.69%	-32.28%	-43.41%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-14.08%	-32.28%	+18.20%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-16.75%	-32.28%	+15.53%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-41.82%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-58.10%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-17.26%	+17.26%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-28.10%	-11.97%	-16.13%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.16%	11.53%	-7.37%

Volatility

EWO vs. COPJ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares MSCI Austria ETF (EWO) is 7.31%, while Sprott Junior Copper Miners ETF (COPJ) has a volatility of 19.44%. This indicates that EWO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than COPJ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	EWO	COPJ	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	7.31%	19.44%	-12.13%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	15.88%	37.98%	-22.10%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	19.19%	44.42%	-25.23%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	21.95%	35.48%	-13.53%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	22.88%	35.48%	-12.60%

EWO vs. COPJ - Expense Ratio Comparison

EWO has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is lower than COPJ's 0.78% expense ratio.

Dividends

EWO vs. COPJ - Dividend Comparison

EWO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.01%, less than COPJ's 10.69% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
COPJ Sprott Junior Copper Miners ETF	10.69%	11.57%	11.64%	2.48%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
EWO iShares MSCI Austria ETF	2.01%	2.38%	7.40%	5.66%	4.75%	2.42%	0.98%	3.11%	4.04%	2.03%	1.99%	1.51%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both EWO and COPJ in my portfolio?

EWO and COPJ have a correlation of 0.45, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, EWO or COPJ?

COPJ has higher volatility (19.44%) compared to EWO (7.31%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EWO dropped -75.69% vs COPJ's -32.28%.

Which ETF is better, EWO or COPJ?

On 3-year performance, COPJ leads with 41.69% vs 33.19% for EWO. On fees, EWO is cheaper at 0.49% per year. On volatility, EWO has been the lower-risk option at 7.31%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, EWO or COPJ?

Over the 3-year period, COPJ has performed better with a 41.69% return vs 33.19%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, EWO or COPJ?

EWO is cheaper with a 0.49% expense ratio, compared with 0.78% for COPJ.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, EWO or COPJ?

COPJ has the higher dividend yield at 10.69%, compared with 2.01% for EWO.

What is the main difference between EWO and COPJ?

EWO is categorized as Europe Equities, while COPJ is Commodity Producers Equities. EWO tracks MSCI Austria Investable Market Index, while COPJ tracks Nasdaq Sprott Junior Copper Miners Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Sprott. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for EWO and 0.78% for COPJ.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

EWO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.41 vs 2.33), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.