PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EWN vs. DBEU
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EWN vs. DBEU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares MSCI Netherlands ETF (EWN) and Xtrackers MSCI Europe Hedged Equity Fund (DBEU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EWN achieves a 18.09% return, which is significantly higher than DBEU's 7.52% return. Over the past 10 years, EWN has outperformed DBEU with an annualized return of 12.79%, while DBEU has yielded a comparatively lower 11.01% annualized return.


EWN

1D
-1.30%
1M
8.53%
YTD
18.09%
6M
18.14%
1Y
33.81%
3Y*
19.93%
5Y*
8.69%
10Y*
12.79%

DBEU

1D
-0.90%
1M
3.69%
YTD
7.52%
6M
9.62%
1Y
17.80%
3Y*
14.56%
5Y*
11.19%
10Y*
11.01%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EWN vs. DBEU - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
EWN
iShares MSCI Netherlands ETF
18.09%34.87%1.67%22.08%-24.43%22.74%23.23%32.45%-15.37%33.73%
DBEU
Xtrackers MSCI Europe Hedged Equity Fund
7.52%22.18%9.17%17.43%-6.25%23.99%-1.42%27.32%-8.49%14.60%

Correlation

The correlation between EWN and DBEU is 0.75, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.75

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.75

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.79

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.79

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 2, 2013

0.78

The correlation between EWN and DBEU has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.75 to 0.79 - a consistent structural relationship.

EWN vs. DBEU - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
EWN
DBEU

Technology

34.8%
8.5%

Financial Services

18.1%
23.2%

Communication Services

14.7%
3.7%

Consumer Defensive

11.5%
8.7%

Industrials

10.2%
19.8%

Basic Materials

3.1%
5.6%

Healthcare

2.6%
13.0%

Energy

2.1%
5.4%

Consumer Cyclical

1.5%
6.3%

Real Estate

0.7%
0.8%

Utilities

-

5.1%

Technology

EWN
34.8%
DBEU
8.5%

Financial Services

EWN
18.1%
DBEU
23.2%

Communication Services

EWN
14.7%
DBEU
3.7%

Consumer Defensive

EWN
11.5%
DBEU
8.7%

Industrials

EWN
10.2%
DBEU
19.8%

Basic Materials

EWN
3.1%
DBEU
5.6%

Healthcare

EWN
2.6%
DBEU
13.0%

Energy

EWN
2.1%
DBEU
5.4%

Consumer Cyclical

EWN
1.5%
DBEU
6.3%

Real Estate

EWN
0.7%
DBEU
0.8%

Utilities

EWN

-

DBEU
5.1%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EWN vs. DBEU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EWN
EWN Risk / Return Rank: 5151
Overall Rank
EWN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4949
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EWN Sortino Ratio Rank: 5050
Sortino Ratio Rank
EWN Omega Ratio Rank: 4747
Omega Ratio Rank
EWN Calmar Ratio Rank: 5252
Calmar Ratio Rank
EWN Martin Ratio Rank: 5656
Martin Ratio Rank

DBEU
DBEU Risk / Return Rank: 3939
Overall Rank
DBEU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3939
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DBEU Sortino Ratio Rank: 3838
Sortino Ratio Rank
DBEU Omega Ratio Rank: 3939
Omega Ratio Rank
DBEU Calmar Ratio Rank: 3636
Calmar Ratio Rank
DBEU Martin Ratio Rank: 4444
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EWN vs. DBEU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Netherlands ETF (EWN) and Xtrackers MSCI Europe Hedged Equity Fund (DBEU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


EWNDBEUDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.32

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.46

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.30

1.25

+0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.57

1.82

+0.74

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.70

7.27

+2.43

EWN vs. DBEU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EWN Sharpe Ratio is 1.73, which is comparable to the DBEU Sharpe Ratio of 1.41. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EWN and DBEU, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


EWNDBEUDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.73

1.41

+0.32

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.38

0.79

-0.40

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.60

0.67

-0.07

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.31

0.58

-0.27

Drawdowns

EWN vs. DBEU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EWN drawdown since its inception was -65.22%, which is greater than DBEU's maximum drawdown of -34.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EWN and DBEU.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EWNDBEUDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-65.22%

-34.50%

-30.72%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.24%

-9.81%

-3.43%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.77%

-15.35%

-4.42%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-43.57%

-17.67%

-25.90%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-43.57%

-34.50%

-9.07%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.30%

-1.49%

+0.19%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-16.35%

-4.44%

-11.91%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.49%

2.45%

+1.04%

Volatility

EWN vs. DBEU - Volatility Comparison

iShares MSCI Netherlands ETF (EWN) has a higher volatility of 7.50% compared to Xtrackers MSCI Europe Hedged Equity Fund (DBEU) at 4.71%. This indicates that EWN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DBEU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EWNDBEUDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.50%

4.71%

+2.79%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.37%

10.50%

+5.87%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.68%

12.70%

+6.98%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.88%

14.32%

+8.56%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.36%

16.46%

+4.90%

EWN vs. DBEU - Expense Ratio Comparison

EWN has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than DBEU's 0.45% expense ratio.


Dividends

EWN vs. DBEU - Dividend Comparison

EWN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.26%, which matches DBEU's 4.23% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DBEU
Xtrackers MSCI Europe Hedged Equity Fund
4.23%4.55%0.07%3.64%1.96%1.87%2.44%2.77%3.55%2.28%9.92%5.50%
EWN
iShares MSCI Netherlands ETF
4.26%5.03%2.18%1.79%1.98%1.01%0.78%2.57%2.40%1.68%2.71%1.92%

Frequently Asked Questions


EWN and DBEU have a correlation of 0.75, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

EWN has higher volatility (7.50%) compared to DBEU (4.71%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EWN dropped -65.22% vs DBEU's -34.50%.

On 10-year performance, EWN leads with 12.79% vs 11.01% for DBEU. On fees, DBEU is cheaper at 0.45% per year. On volatility, DBEU has been the lower-risk option at 4.71%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, EWN has performed better with a 12.79% return vs 11.01%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

DBEU is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for EWN.

EWN has the higher dividend yield at 4.26%, compared with 4.23% for DBEU.

EWN tracks MSCI Netherlands Investable Market Index, while DBEU tracks MSCI Europe US Dollar Hedged Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and DWS. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for EWN and 0.45% for DBEU.

EWN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.73 vs 1.41), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EWN and DBEU

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer