PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EWN vs. BBEU
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EWN vs. BBEU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares MSCI Netherlands ETF (EWN) and JPMorgan BetaBuilders Europe ETF (BBEU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EWN achieves a 21.82% return, which is significantly higher than BBEU's 11.59% return.


EWN

1D
-0.39%
1M
-0.03%
6M
13.76%
YTD
21.82%
1Y
40.52%
3Y*
20.12%
5Y*
9.02%
10Y*
13.54%
ALL TIME*
7.62%

BBEU

1D
-0.05%
1M
1.80%
6M
6.18%
YTD
11.59%
1Y
24.71%
3Y*
18.10%
5Y*
9.88%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
9.62%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$15.19M$17.44M$26.82M
$21.41M$19.03M$16.31M

EWN vs. BBEU - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
EWN
iShares MSCI Netherlands ETF
21.82%34.87%1.67%22.08%-24.43%22.74%23.23%32.45%-15.77%
BBEU
JPMorgan BetaBuilders Europe ETF
11.59%36.37%1.85%20.31%-14.72%17.50%5.00%23.96%-13.25%

Correlation

The correlation between EWN and BBEU is 0.81, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.81

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.84

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.87

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 18, 2018

0.88

The correlation between EWN and BBEU has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.81 to 0.88 - a consistent structural relationship.

EWN vs. BBEU - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
EWN
BBEU

Technology

37.8%
8.0%

Financial Services

17.3%
23.2%

Industrials

10.4%
14.5%

Consumer Defensive

9.9%
8.1%

Communication Services

9.8%
2.5%

Consumer Cyclical

5.4%
4.3%

Basic Materials

4.7%
4.0%

Healthcare

2.5%
11.0%

Energy

1.8%
3.5%

Real Estate

0.7%
0.3%

Utilities

-

2.9%

Technology

EWN
37.8%
BBEU
8.0%

Financial Services

EWN
17.3%
BBEU
23.2%

Industrials

EWN
10.4%
BBEU
14.5%

Consumer Defensive

EWN
9.9%
BBEU
8.1%

Communication Services

EWN
9.8%
BBEU
2.5%

Consumer Cyclical

EWN
5.4%
BBEU
4.3%

Basic Materials

EWN
4.7%
BBEU
4.0%

Healthcare

EWN
2.5%
BBEU
11.0%

Energy

EWN
1.8%
BBEU
3.5%

Real Estate

EWN
0.7%
BBEU
0.3%

Utilities

EWN

-

BBEU
2.9%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EWN vs. BBEU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

EWN
EWN Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
EWN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EWN Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
EWN Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
EWN Calmar Ratio Rank: 7777
Calmar Ratio Rank
EWN Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank

BBEU
BBEU Risk / Return Rank: 5454
Overall Rank
BBEU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5656
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BBEU Sortino Ratio Rank: 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
BBEU Omega Ratio Rank: 5353
Omega Ratio Rank
BBEU Calmar Ratio Rank: 4949
Calmar Ratio Rank
BBEU Martin Ratio Rank: 5757
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

EWN vs. BBEU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Netherlands ETF (EWN) and JPMorgan BetaBuilders Europe ETF (BBEU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


EWNBBEUDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.26

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.31

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.31

1.27

+0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.08

2.03

+1.05

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.09

7.70

+3.39

EWN vs. BBEU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EWN Sharpe Ratio is 1.82, which is comparable to the BBEU Sharpe Ratio of 1.56. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EWN and BBEU, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

EWN vs. BBEU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EWN drawdown since its inception was -65.22%, which is greater than BBEU's maximum drawdown of -36.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EWN and BBEU.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EWNBBEUDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-65.22%

-36.27%

-28.95%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.24%

-12.23%

-1.01%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.77%

-14.23%

-5.54%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-43.57%

-31.08%

-12.49%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-43.57%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.88%

-0.05%

-2.83%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-16.27%

-6.03%

-10.24%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.66%

3.22%

+0.44%

Volatility

EWN vs. BBEU - Volatility Comparison

iShares MSCI Netherlands ETF (EWN) has a higher volatility of 7.12% compared to JPMorgan BetaBuilders Europe ETF (BBEU) at 3.91%. This indicates that EWN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BBEU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EWNBBEUDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.12%

3.91%

+3.21%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

19.17%

13.84%

+5.33%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

22.37%

15.90%

+6.47%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

23.38%

17.58%

+5.80%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.33%

19.25%

+2.08%

EWN vs. BBEU - Expense Ratio Comparison

EWN has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than BBEU's 0.09% expense ratio.


Dividends

EWN vs. BBEU - Dividend Comparison

EWN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.12%, more than BBEU's 2.84% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BBEU
JPMorgan BetaBuilders Europe ETF
2.84%2.83%4.16%2.94%4.72%2.63%2.29%3.24%0.49%0.00%0.00%0.00%
EWN
iShares MSCI Netherlands ETF
4.12%5.03%2.18%1.79%1.98%1.01%0.78%2.57%2.40%1.68%2.71%1.92%

Frequently Asked Questions


EWN and BBEU have a correlation of 0.81, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

EWN has higher volatility (7.12%) compared to BBEU (3.91%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EWN dropped -65.22% vs BBEU's -36.27%.

On 5-year performance, BBEU leads with 9.88% vs 9.02% for EWN. On fees, BBEU is cheaper at 0.09% per year. On volatility, BBEU has been the lower-risk option at 3.91%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, BBEU has performed better with a 9.88% return vs 9.02%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

BBEU is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for EWN.

EWN has the higher dividend yield at 4.12%, compared with 2.84% for BBEU.

EWN tracks MSCI Netherlands Investable Market Index, while BBEU tracks Morningstar Developed Europe Target Market Exposure Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and JPMorgan. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for EWN and 0.09% for BBEU.

EWN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.82 vs 1.56), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EWN and BBEU

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer