EWM vs. IHI
EWM (iShares MSCI Malaysia ETF) and IHI (iShares U.S. Medical Devices ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - EWM is a Asia Pacific Equities fund tracking the MSCI Malaysia Index, while IHI is a Health & Biotech Equities fund tracking the Dow Jones U.S. Select Medical Equipment Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, EWM returned 2.51%/yr vs 8.42%/yr for IHI. At a 0.45 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. EWM charges 0.49%/yr vs 0.38%/yr for IHI.
Performance
EWM vs. IHI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EWM achieves a 4.13% return, which is significantly higher than IHI's -18.43% return. Over the past 10 years, EWM has underperformed IHI with an annualized return of 2.51%, while IHI has yielded a comparatively higher 8.42% annualized return.
EWM
- 1D
- -0.96%
- 1M
- 1.42%
- 6M
- 1.13%
- YTD
- 4.13%
- 1Y
- 20.95%
- 3Y*
- 14.15%
- 5Y*
- 6.17%
- 10Y*
- 2.51%
- ALL TIME*
- 1.89%
IHI
- 1D
- 0.14%
- 1M
- 3.08%
- 6M
- -18.01%
- YTD
- -18.43%
- 1Y
- -15.42%
- 3Y*
- -3.77%
- 5Y*
- -3.32%
- 10Y*
- 8.42%
- ALL TIME*
- 9.83%
EWM vs. IHI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EWM iShares MSCI Malaysia ETF | 4.13% | 15.74% | 19.46% | -3.61% | -6.00% | -7.40% | 3.12% | -1.41% | -6.28% | 24.25% |
IHI iShares U.S. Medical Devices ETF | -18.43% | 6.88% | 8.62% | 3.24% | -19.80% | 21.03% | 24.17% | 32.75% | 15.45% | 30.81% |
Correlation
The correlation between EWM and IHI is 0.22, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.22 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.28 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.32 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.36 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 5, 2006 | 0.45 |
Over the past year, the correlation between EWM and IHI has dropped to 0.22 - well below their long-term average of 0.45, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
EWM vs. IHI - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
EWM
IHI
Financial Services
-
Industrials
Utilities
-
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Healthcare
Energy
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
-
Financial Services
EWM
IHI
-
Industrials
EWM
IHI
Utilities
EWM
IHI
-
Basic Materials
EWM
IHI
-
Communication Services
EWM
IHI
-
Consumer Defensive
EWM
IHI
-
Healthcare
EWM
IHI
Energy
EWM
IHI
-
Consumer Cyclical
EWM
IHI
-
Real Estate
EWM
-
IHI
-
Technology
EWM
-
IHI
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EWM vs. IHI — Risk / Return Rank
EWM
IHI
EWM vs. IHI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Malaysia ETF (EWM) and iShares U.S. Medical Devices ETF (IHI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| EWM | IHI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.27 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +3.14 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.25 | 0.88 | +0.37 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.98 | -0.59 | +2.58 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.50 | -1.22 | +6.72 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
EWM vs. IHI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EWM drawdown since its inception was -89.19%, which is greater than IHI's maximum drawdown of -49.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EWM and IHI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EWM | IHI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -89.19% | -49.65% | -39.54% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.61% | -26.11% | +15.50% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -21.31% | -26.64% | +5.33% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -22.76% | -33.12% | +10.36% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -43.81% | -33.25% | -10.56% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.98% | -22.98% | +15.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -31.73% | -8.41% | -23.32% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.82% | 12.70% | -8.88% |
Volatility
EWM vs. IHI - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares MSCI Malaysia ETF (EWM) is 4.42%, while iShares U.S. Medical Devices ETF (IHI) has a volatility of 9.63%. This indicates that EWM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IHI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EWM | IHI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.42% | 9.63% | -5.21% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.40% | 16.15% | -4.75% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.30% | 19.55% | -5.25% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.77% | 19.48% | -5.71% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.15% | 19.98% | -3.83% |
EWM vs. IHI - Expense Ratio Comparison
EWM has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is higher than IHI's 0.38% expense ratio.
Dividends
EWM vs. IHI - Dividend Comparison
EWM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.57%, more than IHI's 0.48% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EWM iShares MSCI Malaysia ETF | 3.57% | 3.41% | 3.32% | 3.47% | 3.00% | 6.48% | 1.89% | 2.91% | 3.84% | 5.58% | 5.97% | 37.54% |
IHI iShares U.S. Medical Devices ETF | 0.48% | 0.34% | 0.46% | 0.53% | 0.45% | 0.25% | 0.25% | 0.33% | 0.26% | 0.37% | 0.55% | 1.28% |
Frequently Asked Questions
EWM and IHI have a correlation of 0.22, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
IHI has higher volatility (9.63%) compared to EWM (4.42%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EWM dropped -89.19% vs IHI's -49.65%.
On 10-year performance, IHI leads with 8.42% vs 2.51% for EWM. On fees, IHI is cheaper at 0.38% per year. On volatility, EWM has been the lower-risk option at 4.42%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, IHI has performed better with a 8.42% return vs 2.51%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IHI is cheaper with a 0.38% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for EWM.
EWM has the higher dividend yield at 3.57%, compared with 0.48% for IHI.
EWM is categorized as Asia Pacific Equities, while IHI is Health & Biotech Equities. EWM tracks MSCI Malaysia Index, while IHI tracks Dow Jones U.S. Select Medical Equipment Index. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for EWM and 0.38% for IHI.
EWM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.47 vs -0.79), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for EWM and IHI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer