EWM vs. COLO

Last updated Jun 13, 2026

EWM (iShares MSCI Malaysia ETF) and COLO (Global X MSCI Colombia ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - EWM is a Asia Pacific Equities fund tracking the MSCI Malaysia Index, while COLO is a Latin America Equities fund tracking the MSCI All Colombia Select 25/50 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, EWM returned 2.79%/yr vs 7.08%/yr for COLO. At a 0.46 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. EWM charges 0.49%/yr vs 0.62%/yr for COLO.

Performance

EWM vs. COLO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares MSCI Malaysia ETF (EWM) and Global X MSCI Colombia ETF (COLO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EWM achieves a 2.89% return, which is significantly lower than COLO's 23.32% return. Over the past 10 years, EWM has underperformed COLO with an annualized return of 2.79%, while COLO has yielded a comparatively higher 7.08% annualized return.

EWM

• 1D: 0.25%
• 1M: -6.82%
• YTD: 2.89%
• 6M: 6.00%
• 1Y: 19.03%
• 3Y*: 14.97%
• 5Y*: 4.69%
• 10Y*: 2.79%

COLO

• 1D: 2.47%
• 1M: 22.56%
• YTD: 23.32%
• 6M: 22.17%
• 1Y: 61.24%
• 3Y*: 35.23%
• 5Y*: 16.00%
• 10Y*: 7.08%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EWM vs. COLO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
EWM iShares MSCI Malaysia ETF	2.89%	15.74%	19.46%	-3.61%	-6.00%	-7.40%	3.12%	-1.41%	-6.28%	24.25%
COLO Global X MSCI Colombia ETF	23.32%	68.88%	4.68%	24.92%	-21.32%	-11.50%	-14.60%	30.42%	-19.88%	11.88%

Correlation

The correlation between EWM and COLO is 0.37, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.37
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.34
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.34
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.39
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 9, 2009	0.46

The correlation between EWM and COLO shifts across timeframes, from 0.34 (5 years) to 0.46 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

EWM vs. COLO - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	EWM	COLO
Financial Services	46.6%	39.3%
Industrials	11.1%	2.4%
Utilities	10.8%	17.7%
Basic Materials	8.9%	18.4%
Consumer Defensive	7.3%	-
Communication Services	6.6%	3.4%
Energy	3.9%	17.3%
Healthcare	3.8%	-
Consumer Cyclical	1.1%	1.5%
Real Estate	-	-
Technology	-	-

Return for Risk

EWM vs. COLO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EWM

EWM Risk / Return Rank: 44
EWM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 44
EWM Sortino Ratio Rank: 43
EWM Omega Ratio Rank: 41
EWM Calmar Ratio Rank: 48
EWM Martin Ratio Rank: 46

COLO

COLO Risk / Return Rank: 80
COLO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 90
COLO Sortino Ratio Rank: 89
COLO Omega Ratio Rank: 86
COLO Calmar Ratio Rank: 76
COLO Martin Ratio Rank: 59

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EWM vs. COLO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Malaysia ETF (EWM) and Global X MSCI Colombia ETF (COLO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	EWM	COLO	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.36	2.67	-1.32
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.92	3.59	-1.66
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.24	1.46	-0.22
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.09	3.46	-1.37
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	6.65	9.36	-2.71

EWM vs. COLO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EWM Sharpe Ratio is 1.36, which is lower than the COLO Sharpe Ratio of 2.67. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EWM and COLO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

EWM vs. COLO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EWM drawdown since its inception was -89.19%, which is greater than COLO's maximum drawdown of -78.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EWM and COLO.

Drawdown Indicators

	EWM	COLO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-89.19%	-78.91%	-10.28%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.14%	-17.79%	+8.65%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-21.31%	-18.35%	-2.96%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-22.76%	-43.86%	+21.10%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-43.81%	-62.75%	+18.94%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-9.08%	-16.29%	+7.21%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-31.80%	-40.28%	+8.48%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.87%	6.56%	-3.69%

Volatility

EWM vs. COLO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares MSCI Malaysia ETF (EWM) is 3.97%, while Global X MSCI Colombia ETF (COLO) has a volatility of 11.56%. This indicates that EWM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than COLO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	EWM	COLO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.97%	11.56%	-7.59%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.95%	20.33%	-9.38%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	14.10%	23.03%	-8.93%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	13.72%	23.37%	-9.65%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.27%	25.47%	-9.20%

EWM vs. COLO - Expense Ratio Comparison

EWM has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is lower than COLO's 0.62% expense ratio.

Dividends

EWM vs. COLO - Dividend Comparison

EWM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.32%, less than COLO's 6.09% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
COLO Global X MSCI Colombia ETF	6.09%	7.51%	6.08%	6.99%	12.55%	2.32%	3.23%	3.04%	3.03%	1.83%	1.48%	1.58%
EWM iShares MSCI Malaysia ETF	3.32%	3.41%	3.32%	3.47%	3.00%	6.48%	1.89%	2.91%	3.84%	5.58%	5.97%	37.54%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both EWM and COLO in my portfolio?

EWM and COLO have a correlation of 0.37, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, EWM or COLO?

COLO has higher volatility (11.56%) compared to EWM (3.97%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EWM dropped -89.19% vs COLO's -78.91%.

Which ETF is better, EWM or COLO?

On 10-year performance, COLO leads with 7.08% vs 2.79% for EWM. On fees, EWM is cheaper at 0.49% per year. On volatility, EWM has been the lower-risk option at 3.97%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, EWM or COLO?

Over the 10-year period, COLO has performed better with a 7.08% return vs 2.79%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, EWM or COLO?

EWM is cheaper with a 0.49% expense ratio, compared with 0.62% for COLO.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, EWM or COLO?

COLO has the higher dividend yield at 6.09%, compared with 3.32% for EWM.

What is the main difference between EWM and COLO?

EWM is categorized as Asia Pacific Equities, while COLO is Latin America Equities. EWM tracks MSCI Malaysia Index, while COLO tracks MSCI All Colombia Select 25/50 Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for EWM and 0.62% for COLO.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

COLO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.67 vs 1.36), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.