EWJ vs. GLD
EWJ (iShares MSCI Japan ETF) and GLD (SPDR Gold Shares) are both exchange-traded funds - EWJ is a Japan Equities fund tracking the MSCI Japan Index, while GLD is a Gold fund tracking the LBMA Gold Price PM. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, EWJ returned 9.21%/yr vs 12.56%/yr for GLD. At a 0.14 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. EWJ charges 0.49%/yr vs 0.40%/yr for GLD.
Performance
EWJ vs. GLD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EWJ achieves a 13.88% return, which is significantly higher than GLD's 0.24% return. Over the past 10 years, EWJ has underperformed GLD with an annualized return of 9.21%, while GLD has yielded a comparatively higher 12.56% annualized return.
EWJ
- 1D
- 1.36%
- 1M
- -0.29%
- YTD
- 13.88%
- 6M
- 14.67%
- 1Y
- 30.27%
- 3Y*
- 17.05%
- 5Y*
- 8.50%
- 10Y*
- 9.21%
GLD
- 1D
- 0.26%
- 1M
- -8.41%
- YTD
- 0.24%
- 6M
- 3.07%
- 1Y
- 30.18%
- 3Y*
- 29.71%
- 5Y*
- 17.55%
- 10Y*
- 12.56%
EWJ vs. GLD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EWJ iShares MSCI Japan ETF | 13.88% | 25.84% | 7.03% | 20.29% | -17.72% | 1.16% | 15.40% | 19.34% | -14.10% | 24.27% |
GLD SPDR Gold Shares | 0.24% | 63.68% | 26.66% | 12.69% | -0.77% | -4.15% | 24.81% | 17.86% | -1.94% | 12.81% |
Correlation
The correlation between EWJ and GLD is 0.30, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.30 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.29 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.27 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.16 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 19, 2004 | 0.14 |
The correlation between EWJ and GLD shifts across timeframes, from 0.14 (all time) to 0.30 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
EWJ vs. GLD - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
EWJ
GLD
Industrials
-
Technology
-
Financial Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Communication Services
-
Healthcare
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Basic Materials
Real Estate
-
Utilities
-
Energy
-
Industrials
EWJ
GLD
-
Technology
EWJ
GLD
-
Financial Services
EWJ
GLD
-
Consumer Cyclical
EWJ
GLD
-
Communication Services
EWJ
GLD
-
Healthcare
EWJ
GLD
-
Consumer Defensive
EWJ
GLD
-
Basic Materials
EWJ
GLD
Real Estate
EWJ
GLD
-
Utilities
EWJ
GLD
-
Energy
EWJ
GLD
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EWJ vs. GLD — Risk / Return Rank
EWJ
GLD
EWJ vs. GLD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Japan ETF (EWJ) and SPDR Gold Shares (GLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| EWJ | GLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.40 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.70 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.29 | 1.23 | +0.06 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.24 | 1.51 | +0.73 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.56 | 3.78 | +3.78 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| EWJ | GLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.53 | 1.13 | +0.40 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.47 | 0.98 | -0.51 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.53 | 0.79 | -0.25 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.11 | 0.59 | -0.48 |
Drawdowns
EWJ vs. GLD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EWJ drawdown since its inception was -60.93%, which is greater than GLD's maximum drawdown of -45.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EWJ and GLD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EWJ | GLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -60.93% | -45.56% | -15.37% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.59% | -20.10% | +6.51% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.68% | -20.10% | +5.42% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -33.14% | -21.03% | -12.11% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -33.14% | -22.00% | -11.14% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.32% | -19.89% | +17.57% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -21.73% | -16.16% | -5.57% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.02% | 8.01% | -3.99% |
Volatility
EWJ vs. GLD - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares MSCI Japan ETF (EWJ) is 5.21%, while SPDR Gold Shares (GLD) has a volatility of 5.68%. This indicates that EWJ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GLD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EWJ | GLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.21% | 5.68% | -0.47% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.51% | 23.47% | -7.96% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.89% | 26.87% | -6.98% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.31% | 18.07% | +0.24% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.31% | 15.99% | +1.32% |
EWJ vs. GLD - Expense Ratio Comparison
EWJ has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is higher than GLD's 0.40% expense ratio.
Dividends
EWJ vs. GLD - Dividend Comparison
EWJ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.97%, while GLD has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EWJ iShares MSCI Japan ETF | 3.97% | 4.52% | 2.34% | 2.03% | 1.23% | 2.08% | 1.04% | 2.03% | 1.71% | 1.25% | 1.95% | 1.27% |
GLD SPDR Gold Shares | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
EWJ and GLD have a correlation of 0.30, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
GLD has higher volatility (5.68%) compared to EWJ (5.21%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EWJ dropped -60.93% vs GLD's -45.56%.
On 10-year performance, GLD leads with 12.56% vs 9.21% for EWJ. On fees, GLD is cheaper at 0.40% per year. On volatility, EWJ has been the lower-risk option at 5.21%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, GLD has performed better with a 12.56% return vs 9.21%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
GLD is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for EWJ.
EWJ has the higher dividend yield at 3.97%, compared with 0.00% for GLD.
EWJ is categorized as Japan Equities, while GLD is Gold. EWJ tracks MSCI Japan Index, while GLD tracks LBMA Gold Price PM. They also come from different issuers: iShares and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for EWJ and 0.40% for GLD.
EWJ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.53 vs 1.13), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for EWJ and GLD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer