EWI vs. EWM
EWI (iShares MSCI Italy ETF) and EWM (iShares MSCI Malaysia ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - EWI is a Europe Equities fund tracking the MSCI Italy Index, while EWM is a Asia Pacific Equities fund tracking the MSCI Malaysia Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, EWI returned 13.44%/yr vs 2.62%/yr for EWM. At a 0.41 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. Both charge a 0.49% expense ratio.
Performance
EWI vs. EWM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EWI achieves a 7.95% return, which is significantly higher than EWM's 1.72% return. Over the past 10 years, EWI has outperformed EWM with an annualized return of 13.44%, while EWM has yielded a comparatively lower 2.62% annualized return.
EWI
- 1D
- 1.05%
- 1M
- -0.81%
- YTD
- 7.95%
- 6M
- 12.15%
- 1Y
- 25.19%
- 3Y*
- 28.16%
- 5Y*
- 15.36%
- 10Y*
- 13.44%
EWM
- 1D
- -0.29%
- 1M
- -8.18%
- YTD
- 1.72%
- 6M
- 7.42%
- 1Y
- 19.09%
- 3Y*
- 14.69%
- 5Y*
- 4.38%
- 10Y*
- 2.62%
EWI vs. EWM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EWI iShares MSCI Italy ETF | 7.95% | 55.72% | 10.23% | 30.63% | -14.16% | 14.38% | 1.69% | 26.98% | -17.18% | 28.70% |
EWM iShares MSCI Malaysia ETF | 1.72% | 15.74% | 19.46% | -3.61% | -6.00% | -7.40% | 3.12% | -1.41% | -6.28% | 24.25% |
Correlation
The correlation between EWI and EWM is 0.52, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.52 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.41 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.44 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.46 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 2, 1996 | 0.41 |
The correlation between EWI and EWM shifts across timeframes, from 0.41 (all time) to 0.52 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
EWI vs. EWM - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
EWI
EWM
Financial Services
Utilities
Industrials
Consumer Cyclical
Energy
Communication Services
Healthcare
Basic Materials
Consumer Defensive
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
-
-
Financial Services
EWI
EWM
Utilities
EWI
EWM
Industrials
EWI
EWM
Consumer Cyclical
EWI
EWM
Energy
EWI
EWM
Communication Services
EWI
EWM
Healthcare
EWI
EWM
Basic Materials
EWI
EWM
Consumer Defensive
EWI
EWM
Real Estate
EWI
-
EWM
-
Technology
EWI
-
EWM
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EWI vs. EWM — Risk / Return Rank
EWI
EWM
EWI vs. EWM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Italy ETF (EWI) and iShares MSCI Malaysia ETF (EWM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| EWI | EWM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.03 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.03 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.24 | 1.24 | 0.00 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.03 | 2.25 | -0.22 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.54 | 7.15 | +0.39 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| EWI | EWM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.39 | 1.37 | +0.03 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.73 | 0.32 | +0.41 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.58 | 0.16 | +0.42 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.23 | 0.07 | +0.16 |
Drawdowns
EWI vs. EWM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EWI drawdown since its inception was -70.38%, smaller than the maximum EWM drawdown of -89.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EWI and EWM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EWI | EWM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -70.38% | -89.19% | +18.81% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.48% | -8.51% | -3.97% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -16.80% | -21.31% | +4.51% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -35.25% | -22.76% | -12.49% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -43.00% | -43.81% | +0.81% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.61% | -10.11% | +8.50% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -28.93% | -31.82% | +2.89% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.35% | 2.68% | +0.67% |
Volatility
EWI vs. EWM - Volatility Comparison
iShares MSCI Italy ETF (EWI) has a higher volatility of 5.33% compared to iShares MSCI Malaysia ETF (EWM) at 3.44%. This indicates that EWI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EWM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EWI | EWM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.33% | 3.44% | +1.89% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.83% | 10.91% | +3.92% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.19% | 14.05% | +4.14% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.12% | 13.71% | +7.41% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.26% | 16.28% | +6.98% |
EWI vs. EWM - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both EWI and EWM have an expense ratio of 0.49%.
Dividends
EWI vs. EWM - Dividend Comparison
EWI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.60%, less than EWM's 3.35% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EWI iShares MSCI Italy ETF | 2.60% | 2.80% | 4.07% | 3.40% | 4.57% | 2.63% | 1.66% | 3.80% | 4.71% | 2.19% | 3.64% | 2.31% |
EWM iShares MSCI Malaysia ETF | 3.35% | 3.41% | 3.32% | 3.47% | 3.00% | 6.48% | 1.89% | 2.91% | 3.84% | 5.58% | 5.97% | 37.54% |
Frequently Asked Questions
EWI and EWM have a correlation of 0.52, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
EWI has higher volatility (5.33%) compared to EWM (3.44%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EWI dropped -70.38% vs EWM's -89.19%.
On 10-year performance, EWI leads with 13.44% vs 2.62% for EWM. Both ETFs have the same 0.49% expense ratio. On volatility, EWM has been the lower-risk option at 3.44%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, EWI has performed better with a 13.44% return vs 2.62%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
EWI and EWM have the same expense ratio: 0.49% per year.
EWM has the higher dividend yield at 3.35%, compared with 2.60% for EWI.
EWI is categorized as Europe Equities, while EWM is Asia Pacific Equities. EWI tracks MSCI Italy Index, while EWM tracks MSCI Malaysia Index.
EWI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.39 vs 1.37), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for EWI and EWM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer