EWG vs. SLV
EWG (iShares MSCI Germany ETF) and SLV (iShares Silver Trust) are both exchange-traded funds - EWG is a Europe Equities fund tracking the MSCI Germany Index, while SLV is a Silver fund tracking the LBMA Silver Price. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, EWG returned 7.59%/yr vs 15.55%/yr for SLV. At a 0.30 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. EWG charges 0.49%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for SLV.
Performance
EWG vs. SLV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EWG achieves a 0.64% return, which is significantly lower than SLV's 2.78% return. Over the past 10 years, EWG has underperformed SLV with an annualized return of 7.59%, while SLV has yielded a comparatively higher 15.55% annualized return.
EWG
- 1D
- -1.84%
- 1M
- 3.11%
- YTD
- 0.64%
- 6M
- 4.44%
- 1Y
- 3.23%
- 3Y*
- 16.95%
- 5Y*
- 5.94%
- 10Y*
- 7.59%
SLV
- 1D
- -2.62%
- 1M
- 0.41%
- YTD
- 2.78%
- 6M
- 24.76%
- 1Y
- 110.59%
- 3Y*
- 45.06%
- 5Y*
- 20.76%
- 10Y*
- 15.55%
EWG vs. SLV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EWG iShares MSCI Germany ETF | 0.64% | 35.79% | 9.79% | 23.35% | -22.27% | 5.84% | 10.09% | 19.15% | -21.40% | 27.42% |
SLV iShares Silver Trust | 2.78% | 144.66% | 20.89% | -1.09% | 2.37% | -12.45% | 47.30% | 14.88% | -9.19% | 5.82% |
Correlation
The correlation between EWG and SLV is 0.34, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.34 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.35 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.34 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.30 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 1, 2006 | 0.30 |
EWG vs. SLV - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
EWG
SLV
Industrials
-
Financial Services
-
Technology
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Communication Services
-
Healthcare
-
Basic Materials
Utilities
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Real Estate
-
Energy
-
-
Industrials
EWG
SLV
-
Financial Services
EWG
SLV
-
Technology
EWG
SLV
-
Consumer Cyclical
EWG
SLV
-
Communication Services
EWG
SLV
-
Healthcare
EWG
SLV
-
Basic Materials
EWG
SLV
Utilities
EWG
SLV
-
Consumer Defensive
EWG
SLV
-
Real Estate
EWG
SLV
-
Energy
EWG
-
SLV
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EWG vs. SLV — Risk / Return Rank
EWG
SLV
EWG vs. SLV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Germany ETF (EWG) and iShares Silver Trust (SLV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| EWG | SLV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.70 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.68 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.05 | 1.35 | -0.30 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.22 | 2.62 | -2.40 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.66 | 5.64 | -4.98 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| EWG | SLV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.19 | 1.89 | -1.70 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.29 | 0.58 | -0.29 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.36 | 0.49 | -0.13 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.25 | 0.25 | 0.00 |
Drawdowns
EWG vs. SLV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EWG drawdown since its inception was -67.57%, smaller than the maximum SLV drawdown of -76.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EWG and SLV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EWG | SLV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -67.57% | -76.28% | +8.71% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.54% | -42.45% | +27.91% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.81% | -42.45% | +26.64% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -43.44% | -42.45% | -0.99% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -46.80% | -42.81% | -3.99% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.02% | -37.30% | +33.28% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -19.20% | -44.67% | +25.47% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.89% | 19.67% | -14.78% |
Volatility
EWG vs. SLV - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares MSCI Germany ETF (EWG) is 6.49%, while iShares Silver Trust (SLV) has a volatility of 16.30%. This indicates that EWG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SLV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EWG | SLV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.49% | 16.30% | -9.81% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.18% | 58.31% | -44.13% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.28% | 58.90% | -41.62% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.48% | 36.15% | -15.67% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.11% | 31.84% | -10.73% |
EWG vs. SLV - Expense Ratio Comparison
EWG has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is lower than SLV's 0.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
EWG vs. SLV - Dividend Comparison
EWG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.59%, while SLV has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EWG iShares MSCI Germany ETF | 1.59% | 1.60% | 2.38% | 2.56% | 3.24% | 2.70% | 1.67% | 2.51% | 2.93% | 2.06% | 2.35% | 1.93% |
SLV iShares Silver Trust | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
EWG and SLV have a correlation of 0.34, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SLV has higher volatility (16.30%) compared to EWG (6.49%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EWG dropped -67.57% vs SLV's -76.28%.
On 10-year performance, SLV leads with 15.55% vs 7.59% for EWG. On fees, EWG is cheaper at 0.49% per year. On volatility, EWG has been the lower-risk option at 6.49%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, SLV has performed better with a 15.55% return vs 7.59%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
EWG is cheaper with a 0.49% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for SLV.
EWG has the higher dividend yield at 1.59%, compared with 0.00% for SLV.
EWG is categorized as Europe Equities, while SLV is Silver. EWG tracks MSCI Germany Index, while SLV tracks LBMA Silver Price. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for EWG and 0.50% for SLV.
SLV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.89 vs 0.19), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for EWG and SLV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer