EWG vs. FDD
EWG (iShares MSCI Germany ETF) and FDD (First Trust STOXX European Select Dividend Index Fund) are both Europe Equities funds - EWG tracks the MSCI Germany Index while FDD tracks the STOXX Europe Select Dividend 30. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, EWG returned 7.74%/yr vs 10.28%/yr for FDD. A 0.76 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. EWG charges 0.49%/yr vs 0.58%/yr for FDD.
Performance
EWG vs. FDD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EWG achieves a -1.04% return, which is significantly lower than FDD's 11.53% return. Over the past 10 years, EWG has underperformed FDD with an annualized return of 7.74%, while FDD has yielded a comparatively higher 10.28% annualized return.
EWG
- 1D
- -0.63%
- 1M
- -0.60%
- 6M
- -4.05%
- YTD
- -1.04%
- 1Y
- -0.93%
- 3Y*
- 14.46%
- 5Y*
- 5.96%
- 10Y*
- 7.74%
FDD
- 1D
- 0.13%
- 1M
- -1.87%
- 6M
- 10.14%
- YTD
- 11.53%
- 1Y
- 27.51%
- 3Y*
- 24.21%
- 5Y*
- 11.71%
- 10Y*
- 10.28%
EWG vs. FDD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EWG iShares MSCI Germany ETF | -1.04% | 35.79% | 9.79% | 23.35% | -22.27% | 5.84% | 10.09% | 19.15% | -21.40% | 27.42% |
FDD First Trust STOXX European Select Dividend Index Fund | 11.53% | 62.50% | 0.28% | 14.16% | -16.14% | 16.03% | -3.80% | 23.79% | -8.98% | 19.07% |
Correlation
The correlation between EWG and FDD is 0.79, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.79 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.81 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.85 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.83 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 30, 2007 | 0.76 |
The correlation between EWG and FDD has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.76 to 0.85 - a consistent structural relationship.
EWG vs. FDD - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
EWG
FDD
Industrials
Financial Services
Technology
-
Consumer Cyclical
Communication Services
Healthcare
-
Basic Materials
Utilities
Consumer Defensive
Real Estate
Energy
-
Industrials
EWG
FDD
Financial Services
EWG
FDD
Technology
EWG
FDD
-
Consumer Cyclical
EWG
FDD
Communication Services
EWG
FDD
Healthcare
EWG
FDD
-
Basic Materials
EWG
FDD
Utilities
EWG
FDD
Consumer Defensive
EWG
FDD
Real Estate
EWG
FDD
Energy
EWG
-
FDD
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EWG vs. FDD — Risk / Return Rank
EWG
FDD
EWG vs. FDD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Germany ETF (EWG) and First Trust STOXX European Select Dividend Index Fund (FDD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| EWG | FDD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.78 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.37 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.01 | 1.30 | -0.29 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.06 | 2.94 | -3.01 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.18 | 9.43 | -9.61 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
EWG vs. FDD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EWG drawdown since its inception was -67.57%, smaller than the maximum FDD drawdown of -74.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EWG and FDD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EWG | FDD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -67.57% | -74.77% | +7.20% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.54% | -9.39% | -5.15% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.81% | -13.06% | -2.75% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -42.59% | -34.84% | -7.75% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -46.80% | -41.43% | -5.37% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.62% | -2.26% | -3.36% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -19.15% | -35.28% | +16.13% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.11% | 2.93% | +2.18% |
Volatility
EWG vs. FDD - Volatility Comparison
iShares MSCI Germany ETF (EWG) has a higher volatility of 5.48% compared to First Trust STOXX European Select Dividend Index Fund (FDD) at 4.63%. This indicates that EWG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FDD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EWG | FDD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.48% | 4.63% | +0.85% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.18% | 13.09% | +2.09% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.78% | 16.05% | +1.73% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.57% | 18.45% | +2.12% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.80% | 19.75% | +1.05% |
EWG vs. FDD - Expense Ratio Comparison
EWG has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is lower than FDD's 0.58% expense ratio.
Dividends
EWG vs. FDD - Dividend Comparison
EWG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.02%, less than FDD's 5.34% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EWG iShares MSCI Germany ETF | 2.02% | 1.60% | 2.38% | 2.56% | 3.24% | 2.70% | 1.67% | 2.51% | 2.93% | 2.06% | 2.35% | 1.93% |
FDD First Trust STOXX European Select Dividend Index Fund | 5.34% | 3.99% | 7.65% | 6.85% | 6.07% | 3.44% | 4.01% | 4.69% | 5.05% | 2.78% | 4.88% | 4.35% |
Frequently Asked Questions
EWG and FDD have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
EWG has higher volatility (5.48%) compared to FDD (4.63%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EWG dropped -67.57% vs FDD's -74.77%.
On 10-year performance, FDD leads with 10.28% vs 7.74% for EWG. On fees, EWG is cheaper at 0.49% per year. On volatility, FDD has been the lower-risk option at 4.63%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, FDD has performed better with a 10.28% return vs 7.74%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
EWG is cheaper with a 0.49% expense ratio, compared with 0.58% for FDD.
FDD has the higher dividend yield at 5.34%, compared with 2.02% for EWG.
EWG tracks MSCI Germany Index, while FDD tracks STOXX Europe Select Dividend 30. They also come from different issuers: iShares and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for EWG and 0.58% for FDD.
FDD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.72 vs -0.05), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for EWG and FDD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer