PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EWG vs. EWT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EWG vs. EWT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares MSCI Germany ETF (EWG) and iShares MSCI Taiwan ETF (EWT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EWG achieves a -0.85% return, which is significantly lower than EWT's 58.08% return. Over the past 10 years, EWG has underperformed EWT with an annualized return of 7.84%, while EWT has yielded a comparatively higher 19.22% annualized return.


EWG

1D
0.07%
1M
-1.20%
YTD
-0.85%
6M
1.94%
1Y
0.76%
3Y*
16.50%
5Y*
5.71%
10Y*
7.84%

EWT

1D
2.40%
1M
4.49%
YTD
58.08%
6M
60.20%
1Y
94.13%
3Y*
35.08%
5Y*
17.27%
10Y*
19.22%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EWG vs. EWT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
EWG
iShares MSCI Germany ETF
-0.85%35.79%9.79%23.35%-22.27%5.84%10.09%19.15%-21.40%27.42%
EWT
iShares MSCI Taiwan ETF
58.08%28.38%16.11%23.97%-28.90%26.18%31.50%33.36%-9.90%26.81%

Correlation

The correlation between EWG and EWT is 0.62, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.62

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.60

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.63

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.63

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 26, 2000

0.56

The correlation between EWG and EWT has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.56 to 0.63 - a consistent structural relationship.

EWG vs. EWT - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
EWG
EWT

Industrials

30.3%
4.9%

Financial Services

21.6%
13.0%

Technology

13.8%
72.9%

Consumer Cyclical

8.2%
1.9%

Communication Services

6.6%
1.9%

Healthcare

6.1%
0.8%

Basic Materials

5.8%
3.5%

Utilities

4.9%

-

Consumer Defensive

1.4%
1.1%

Real Estate

1.3%

-

Energy

-

-

Industrials

EWG
30.3%
EWT
4.9%

Financial Services

EWG
21.6%
EWT
13.0%

Technology

EWG
13.8%
EWT
72.9%

Consumer Cyclical

EWG
8.2%
EWT
1.9%

Communication Services

EWG
6.6%
EWT
1.9%

Healthcare

EWG
6.1%
EWT
0.8%

Basic Materials

EWG
5.8%
EWT
3.5%

Utilities

EWG
4.9%
EWT

-

Consumer Defensive

EWG
1.4%
EWT
1.1%

Real Estate

EWG
1.3%
EWT

-

Energy

EWG

-

EWT

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EWG vs. EWT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EWG
EWG Risk / Return Rank: 1010
Overall Rank
EWG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1010
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EWG Sortino Ratio Rank: 1010
Sortino Ratio Rank
EWG Omega Ratio Rank: 1010
Omega Ratio Rank
EWG Calmar Ratio Rank: 1010
Calmar Ratio Rank
EWG Martin Ratio Rank: 1010
Martin Ratio Rank

EWT
EWT Risk / Return Rank: 9494
Overall Rank
EWT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EWT Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
EWT Omega Ratio Rank: 9393
Omega Ratio Rank
EWT Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
EWT Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EWG vs. EWT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Germany ETF (EWG) and iShares MSCI Taiwan ETF (EWT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


EWGEWTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-3.56

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-3.89

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.02

1.58

-0.56

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.05

9.00

-8.95

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.15

27.12

-26.96

EWG vs. EWT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EWG Sharpe Ratio is 0.04, which is lower than the EWT Sharpe Ratio of 3.60. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EWG and EWT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


EWGEWTDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.04

3.60

-3.56

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.28

0.76

-0.48

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.37

0.89

-0.52

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.25

0.25

0.00

Drawdowns

EWG vs. EWT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EWG drawdown since its inception was -67.57%, roughly equal to the maximum EWT drawdown of -64.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EWG and EWT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EWGEWTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-67.57%

-64.37%

-3.20%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.54%

-10.51%

-4.03%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.81%

-25.66%

+9.85%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-43.23%

-38.88%

-4.35%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-46.80%

-38.88%

-7.92%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.43%

-6.24%

+0.81%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-19.19%

-19.22%

+0.03%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.92%

3.48%

+1.44%

Volatility

EWG vs. EWT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares MSCI Germany ETF (EWG) is 5.61%, while iShares MSCI Taiwan ETF (EWT) has a volatility of 13.23%. This indicates that EWG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EWT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EWGEWTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.61%

13.23%

-7.62%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.34%

22.13%

-7.79%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.44%

26.35%

-8.91%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.50%

22.84%

-2.34%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.12%

21.74%

-0.62%

EWG vs. EWT - Expense Ratio Comparison

EWG has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is lower than EWT's 0.59% expense ratio.


Dividends

EWG vs. EWT - Dividend Comparison

EWG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.61%, less than EWT's 2.80% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EWG
iShares MSCI Germany ETF
1.61%1.60%2.38%2.56%3.24%2.70%1.67%2.51%2.93%2.06%2.35%1.93%
EWT
iShares MSCI Taiwan ETF
2.80%4.43%3.32%8.12%18.82%0.55%1.83%2.49%3.16%2.81%2.39%3.12%

Frequently Asked Questions


EWG and EWT have a correlation of 0.62, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

EWT has higher volatility (13.23%) compared to EWG (5.61%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EWG dropped -67.57% vs EWT's -64.37%.

On 10-year performance, EWT leads with 19.22% vs 7.84% for EWG. On fees, EWG is cheaper at 0.49% per year. On volatility, EWG has been the lower-risk option at 5.61%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, EWT has performed better with a 19.22% return vs 7.84%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

EWG is cheaper with a 0.49% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for EWT.

EWT has the higher dividend yield at 2.80%, compared with 1.61% for EWG.

EWG is categorized as Europe Equities, while EWT is Asia Pacific Equities. EWG tracks MSCI Germany Index, while EWT tracks MSCI Taiwan Index. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for EWG and 0.59% for EWT.

EWT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.60 vs 0.04), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EWG and EWT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer