EWD vs. EWA
Compare and contrast key facts about iShares MSCI Sweden ETF (EWD) and iShares MSCI-Australia ETF (EWA).
EWD and EWA are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. EWD is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the MSCI Sweden Index. It was launched on Mar 12, 1996. EWA is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the MSCI Australia Index. It was launched on Mar 18, 1996. Both EWD and EWA are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: EWD or EWA.
Correlation
The correlation between EWD and EWA is 0.58, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Performance
EWD vs. EWA - Performance Comparison
Loading data...
Key characteristics
EWD:
0.53
EWA:
0.31
EWD:
1.04
EWA:
0.58
EWD:
1.13
EWA:
1.08
EWD:
0.82
EWA:
0.30
EWD:
2.08
EWA:
0.96
EWD:
7.07%
EWA:
6.83%
EWD:
22.94%
EWA:
21.69%
EWD:
-74.27%
EWA:
-66.98%
EWD:
-0.07%
EWA:
-5.55%
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EWD achieves a 20.79% return, which is significantly higher than EWA's 5.53% return. Over the past 10 years, EWD has outperformed EWA with an annualized return of 6.16%, while EWA has yielded a comparatively lower 5.07% annualized return.
EWD
20.79%
11.86%
12.84%
12.15%
14.18%
6.16%
EWA
5.53%
10.58%
-1.26%
6.61%
13.26%
5.07%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
EWD vs. EWA - Expense Ratio Comparison
EWD has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is higher than EWA's 0.50% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
EWD vs. EWA — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
EWD
EWA
EWD vs. EWA - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Sweden ETF (EWD) and iShares MSCI-Australia ETF (EWA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Loading data...
Dividends
EWD vs. EWA - Dividend Comparison
EWD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.46%, less than EWA's 3.52% yield.
| TTM | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EWD iShares MSCI Sweden ETF | 1.46% | 1.77% | 2.41% | 3.68% | 5.46% | 0.98% | 4.15% | 5.17% | 3.23% | 3.91% | 4.08% | 3.92% |
EWA iShares MSCI-Australia ETF | 3.52% | 3.71% | 3.72% | 5.28% | 5.08% | 2.02% | 3.97% | 6.11% | 4.44% | 4.03% | 5.48% | 4.92% |
Drawdowns
EWD vs. EWA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EWD drawdown since its inception was -74.27%, which is greater than EWA's maximum drawdown of -66.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EWD and EWA. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Loading data...
Volatility
EWD vs. EWA - Volatility Comparison
iShares MSCI Sweden ETF (EWD) has a higher volatility of 5.85% compared to iShares MSCI-Australia ETF (EWA) at 4.79%. This indicates that EWD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EWA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading data...