EWD vs. EWA

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

EWD (iShares MSCI Sweden ETF) and EWA (iShares MSCI-Australia ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - EWD is a Europe Equities fund tracking the MSCI Sweden Index, while EWA is a Asia Pacific Equities fund tracking the MSCI Australia Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, EWD returned 9.31%/yr vs 8.25%/yr for EWA. A 0.56 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. EWD charges 0.55%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for EWA.

Performance

EWD vs. EWA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares MSCI Sweden ETF (EWD) and iShares MSCI-Australia ETF (EWA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EWD achieves a 6.28% return, which is significantly lower than EWA's 10.88% return. Over the past 10 years, EWD has outperformed EWA with an annualized return of 9.31%, while EWA has yielded a comparatively lower 8.25% annualized return.

EWD

• 1D: 1.32%
• 1M: 2.83%
• YTD: 6.28%
• 6M: 10.14%
• 1Y: 17.94%
• 3Y*: 17.14%
• 5Y*: 4.52%
• 10Y*: 9.31%

EWA

• 1D: -0.34%
• 1M: -0.51%
• YTD: 10.88%
• 6M: 12.35%
• 1Y: 13.90%
• 3Y*: 12.73%
• 5Y*: 5.43%
• 10Y*: 8.25%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EWD vs. EWA - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
EWD iShares MSCI Sweden ETF	6.28%	36.55%	-3.90%	25.07%	-27.84%	22.84%	22.27%	21.74%	-12.78%	21.86%
EWA iShares MSCI-Australia ETF	10.88%	13.35%	1.60%	13.81%	-5.92%	8.93%	8.29%	22.45%	-12.04%	19.88%

Correlation

The correlation between EWD and EWA is 0.65, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.65
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.70
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.73
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.71
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 2, 1996	0.56

The correlation between EWD and EWA shifts across timeframes, from 0.56 (all time) to 0.73 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

EWD vs. EWA - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	EWD	EWA
Industrials	46.5%	4.5%
Financial Services	24.1%	43.6%
Communication Services	12.3%	2.0%
Technology	7.2%	1.1%
Basic Materials	3.2%	23.0%
Consumer Cyclical	2.4%	6.1%
Consumer Defensive	2.1%	3.6%
Healthcare	1.2%	4.9%
Real Estate	1.2%	5.0%
Energy	-	4.5%
Utilities	-	1.7%

Return for Risk

EWD vs. EWA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EWD

EWD Risk / Return Rank: 27
EWD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 26
EWD Sortino Ratio Rank: 26
EWD Omega Ratio Rank: 25
EWD Calmar Ratio Rank: 26
EWD Martin Ratio Rank: 30

EWA

EWA Risk / Return Rank: 26
EWA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 24
EWA Sortino Ratio Rank: 24
EWA Omega Ratio Rank: 23
EWA Calmar Ratio Rank: 29
EWA Martin Ratio Rank: 29

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EWD vs. EWA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Sweden ETF (EWD) and iShares MSCI-Australia ETF (EWA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	EWD	EWA	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.92	0.83	+0.09
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.39	1.24	+0.15
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.16	1.15	+0.01
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.24	1.39	-0.15
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	4.26	3.98	+0.28
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

EWD vs. EWA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EWD Sharpe Ratio is 0.92, which is comparable to the EWA Sharpe Ratio of 0.83. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EWD and EWA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	EWD	EWA	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.92	0.83	+0.09
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.19	0.28	-0.09
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.40	0.37	+0.03
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.28	0.29	-0.02

Drawdowns

EWD vs. EWA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EWD drawdown since its inception was -75.40%, which is greater than EWA's maximum drawdown of -66.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EWD and EWA.

Drawdown Indicators

	EWD	EWA	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-75.40%	-66.98%	-8.42%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-14.49%	-10.01%	-4.48%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-17.84%	-21.91%	+4.07%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-42.33%	-24.87%	-17.46%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-42.33%	-45.54%	+3.21%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-4.39%	-4.03%	-0.36%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-19.22%	-11.33%	-7.89%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.22%	3.50%	+0.72%

Volatility

EWD vs. EWA - Volatility Comparison

iShares MSCI Sweden ETF (EWD) has a higher volatility of 7.28% compared to iShares MSCI-Australia ETF (EWA) at 5.36%. This indicates that EWD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EWA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	EWD	EWA	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	7.28%	5.36%	+1.92%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	16.50%	13.97%	+2.53%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	19.76%	16.87%	+2.89%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	23.93%	19.71%	+4.22%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	23.50%	22.60%	+0.90%

EWD vs. EWA - Expense Ratio Comparison

EWD has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is higher than EWA's 0.50% expense ratio.

Dividends

EWD vs. EWA - Dividend Comparison

EWD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.08%, more than EWA's 2.90% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
EWA iShares MSCI-Australia ETF	2.90%	3.21%	3.71%	3.72%	5.28%	5.08%	2.02%	3.97%	6.11%	4.44%	4.03%	5.48%
EWD iShares MSCI Sweden ETF	3.08%	3.27%	1.77%	2.41%	3.68%	5.46%	0.98%	4.15%	5.17%	3.23%	3.91%	4.08%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both EWD and EWA in my portfolio?

EWD and EWA have a correlation of 0.65, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, EWD or EWA?

EWD has higher volatility (7.28%) compared to EWA (5.36%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EWD dropped -75.40% vs EWA's -66.98%.

Which ETF is better, EWD or EWA?

On 10-year performance, EWD leads with 9.31% vs 8.25% for EWA. On fees, EWA is cheaper at 0.50% per year. On volatility, EWA has been the lower-risk option at 5.36%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, EWD or EWA?

Over the 10-year period, EWD has performed better with a 9.31% return vs 8.25%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, EWD or EWA?

EWA is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for EWD.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, EWD or EWA?

EWD has the higher dividend yield at 3.08%, compared with 2.90% for EWA.

What is the main difference between EWD and EWA?

EWD is categorized as Europe Equities, while EWA is Asia Pacific Equities. EWD tracks MSCI Sweden Index, while EWA tracks MSCI Australia Index. Their fees differ too: 0.55% for EWD and 0.50% for EWA.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

EWD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.92 vs 0.83), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.