EWC vs. VDE
EWC (iShares MSCI Canada ETF) and VDE (Vanguard Energy ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - EWC is a Canada Equities fund tracking the MSCI Canada Index, while VDE is a Energy Equities fund tracking the MSCI US Investable Market Energy 25/50 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, EWC returned 11.42%/yr vs 9.39%/yr for VDE. A 0.71 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. EWC charges 0.49%/yr vs 0.09%/yr for VDE.
Performance
EWC vs. VDE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EWC achieves a 8.96% return, which is significantly lower than VDE's 29.66% return. Over the past 10 years, EWC has outperformed VDE with an annualized return of 11.42%, while VDE has yielded a comparatively lower 9.39% annualized return.
EWC
- 1D
- 0.46%
- 1M
- 1.77%
- YTD
- 8.96%
- 6M
- 10.01%
- 1Y
- 29.74%
- 3Y*
- 21.64%
- 5Y*
- 11.33%
- 10Y*
- 11.42%
VDE
- 1D
- 0.77%
- 1M
- -0.78%
- YTD
- 29.66%
- 6M
- 28.33%
- 1Y
- 37.57%
- 3Y*
- 16.71%
- 5Y*
- 20.05%
- 10Y*
- 9.39%
EWC vs. VDE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EWC iShares MSCI Canada ETF | 8.96% | 35.92% | 12.38% | 14.73% | -12.95% | 26.98% | 5.52% | 27.58% | -17.16% | 15.73% |
VDE Vanguard Energy ETF | 29.66% | 7.11% | 6.75% | 0.03% | 62.89% | 56.31% | -33.02% | 9.28% | -19.95% | -2.50% |
Correlation
The correlation between EWC and VDE is 0.04, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.04 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.36 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.52 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.60 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 29, 2004 | 0.71 |
Over the past year, the correlation between EWC and VDE has dropped to 0.04 - well below their long-term average of 0.71, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
EWC vs. VDE - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
EWC
VDE
Financial Services
-
Energy
Basic Materials
Industrials
Technology
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Utilities
-
Communication Services
-
Real Estate
-
Healthcare
-
-
Financial Services
EWC
VDE
-
Energy
EWC
VDE
Basic Materials
EWC
VDE
Industrials
EWC
VDE
Technology
EWC
VDE
-
Consumer Cyclical
EWC
VDE
-
Consumer Defensive
EWC
VDE
-
Utilities
EWC
VDE
-
Communication Services
EWC
VDE
-
Real Estate
EWC
VDE
-
Healthcare
EWC
-
VDE
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EWC vs. VDE — Risk / Return Rank
EWC
VDE
EWC vs. VDE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Canada ETF (EWC) and Vanguard Energy ETF (VDE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| EWC | VDE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.24 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.32 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.36 | 1.30 | +0.06 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.51 | 3.20 | +0.31 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 14.27 | 8.95 | +5.32 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
EWC vs. VDE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EWC drawdown since its inception was -60.75%, smaller than the maximum VDE drawdown of -74.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EWC and VDE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EWC | VDE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -60.75% | -74.20% | +13.45% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.51% | -11.80% | +3.29% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -12.97% | -21.41% | +8.44% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.81% | -26.58% | +1.77% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -42.66% | -69.29% | +26.63% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.18% | -8.26% | +7.08% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -13.13% | -19.95% | +6.82% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.09% | 4.21% | -2.12% |
Volatility
EWC vs. VDE - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares MSCI Canada ETF (EWC) is 4.42%, while Vanguard Energy ETF (VDE) has a volatility of 7.15%. This indicates that EWC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VDE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EWC | VDE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.42% | 7.15% | -2.73% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.32% | 16.59% | -5.27% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.37% | 20.46% | -6.09% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.29% | 26.45% | -9.16% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.74% | 29.93% | -11.19% |
EWC vs. VDE - Expense Ratio Comparison
EWC has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is higher than VDE's 0.09% expense ratio.
Dividends
EWC vs. VDE - Dividend Comparison
EWC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.33%, less than VDE's 2.42% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EWC iShares MSCI Canada ETF | 1.33% | 1.45% | 2.23% | 2.27% | 2.34% | 1.85% | 2.09% | 2.16% | 2.65% | 1.97% | 1.75% | 2.34% |
VDE Vanguard Energy ETF | 2.42% | 3.11% | 3.23% | 3.34% | 3.65% | 4.13% | 4.76% | 3.42% | 3.35% | 2.90% | 2.31% | 3.17% |
Frequently Asked Questions
EWC and VDE have a correlation of 0.04, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
VDE has higher volatility (7.15%) compared to EWC (4.42%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EWC dropped -60.75% vs VDE's -74.20%.
On 10-year performance, EWC leads with 11.42% vs 9.39% for VDE. On fees, VDE is cheaper at 0.09% per year. On volatility, EWC has been the lower-risk option at 4.42%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, EWC has performed better with a 11.42% return vs 9.39%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VDE is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for EWC.
VDE has the higher dividend yield at 2.42%, compared with 1.33% for EWC.
EWC is categorized as Canada Equities, while VDE is Energy Equities. EWC tracks MSCI Canada Index, while VDE tracks MSCI US Investable Market Energy 25/50 Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for EWC and 0.09% for VDE.
EWC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.08 vs 1.85), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for EWC and VDE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer