PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EWC vs. FICDX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EWC vs. FICDX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares MSCI Canada ETF (EWC) and Fidelity Canada Fund (FICDX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EWC achieves a 7.44% return, which is significantly higher than FICDX's 4.52% return. Over the past 10 years, EWC has outperformed FICDX with an annualized return of 11.38%, while FICDX has yielded a comparatively lower 10.40% annualized return.


EWC

1D
-0.38%
1M
-0.97%
YTD
7.44%
6M
6.24%
1Y
28.96%
3Y*
21.74%
5Y*
11.16%
10Y*
11.38%

FICDX

1D
-0.28%
1M
-1.83%
YTD
4.52%
6M
3.55%
1Y
14.49%
3Y*
16.21%
5Y*
10.25%
10Y*
10.40%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EWC vs. FICDX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
EWC
iShares MSCI Canada ETF
7.44%35.92%12.38%14.73%-12.95%26.98%5.52%27.58%-17.16%15.73%
FICDX
Fidelity Canada Fund
4.52%25.86%9.15%14.66%-6.14%26.86%4.43%25.82%-14.32%12.79%

Correlation

The correlation between EWC and FICDX is 0.95 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.95

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.96

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.96

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.96

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 1, 1996

0.85

The correlation between EWC and FICDX shifts across timeframes, from 0.85 (all time) to 0.96 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EWC vs. FICDX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EWC
EWC Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
EWC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6464
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EWC Sortino Ratio Rank: 5959
Sortino Ratio Rank
EWC Omega Ratio Rank: 5959
Omega Ratio Rank
EWC Calmar Ratio Rank: 7171
Calmar Ratio Rank
EWC Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank

FICDX
FICDX Risk / Return Rank: 2323
Overall Rank
FICDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1919
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FICDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1717
Sortino Ratio Rank
FICDX Omega Ratio Rank: 1717
Omega Ratio Rank
FICDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3131
Calmar Ratio Rank
FICDX Martin Ratio Rank: 2929
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EWC vs. FICDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Canada ETF (EWC) and Fidelity Canada Fund (FICDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


EWCFICDXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.86

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.05

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.35

1.20

+0.14

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.42

1.96

+1.46

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.81

6.36

+7.45

EWC vs. FICDX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EWC Sharpe Ratio is 2.02, which is higher than the FICDX Sharpe Ratio of 1.15. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EWC and FICDX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

EWC vs. FICDX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EWC drawdown since its inception was -60.75%, roughly equal to the maximum FICDX drawdown of -58.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EWC and FICDX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EWCFICDXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-60.75%

-58.09%

-2.66%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.51%

-7.60%

-0.91%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.97%

-12.06%

-0.91%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.81%

-21.01%

-3.80%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-42.66%

-39.85%

-2.81%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.55%

-3.70%

+1.15%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-13.12%

-10.51%

-2.61%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.10%

2.34%

-0.24%

Volatility

EWC vs. FICDX - Volatility Comparison

iShares MSCI Canada ETF (EWC) has a higher volatility of 4.34% compared to Fidelity Canada Fund (FICDX) at 3.97%. This indicates that EWC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FICDX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EWCFICDXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.34%

3.97%

+0.37%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.41%

10.21%

+1.20%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.44%

12.96%

+1.48%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.29%

15.99%

+1.30%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.71%

17.43%

+1.28%

EWC vs. FICDX - Expense Ratio Comparison

EWC has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is lower than FICDX's 0.80% expense ratio.


Dividends

EWC vs. FICDX - Dividend Comparison

EWC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.30%, less than FICDX's 5.45% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EWC
iShares MSCI Canada ETF
1.30%1.45%2.23%2.27%2.34%1.85%2.09%2.16%2.65%1.97%1.75%2.34%
FICDX
Fidelity Canada Fund
5.45%5.70%7.44%3.36%4.11%5.16%2.56%4.41%7.33%0.89%1.63%0.15%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.95, EWC and FICDX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

EWC has higher volatility (4.34%) compared to FICDX (3.97%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EWC dropped -60.75% vs FICDX's -58.09%.

EWC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.02 vs 1.15), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EWC and FICDX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer