EWA vs. VXUS
EWA (iShares MSCI-Australia ETF) and VXUS (Vanguard Total International Stock ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - EWA is a Asia Pacific Equities fund tracking the MSCI Australia Index, while VXUS is a Global Equities fund tracking the FTSE Global All Cap ex US Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, EWA returned 8.75%/yr vs 10.22%/yr for VXUS. Their correlation of 0.83 suggests significant overlap in exposure. EWA charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.05%/yr for VXUS.
Performance
EWA vs. VXUS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EWA achieves a 11.57% return, which is significantly lower than VXUS's 13.69% return. Over the past 10 years, EWA has underperformed VXUS with an annualized return of 8.75%, while VXUS has yielded a comparatively higher 10.22% annualized return.
EWA
- 1D
- 0.90%
- 1M
- 0.34%
- YTD
- 11.57%
- 6M
- 12.06%
- 1Y
- 13.27%
- 3Y*
- 11.97%
- 5Y*
- 5.57%
- 10Y*
- 8.75%
VXUS
- 1D
- 0.40%
- 1M
- 0.71%
- YTD
- 13.69%
- 6M
- 15.52%
- 1Y
- 28.39%
- 3Y*
- 18.37%
- 5Y*
- 8.32%
- 10Y*
- 10.22%
EWA vs. VXUS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EWA iShares MSCI-Australia ETF | 11.57% | 13.35% | 1.60% | 13.81% | -5.92% | 8.93% | 8.29% | 22.45% | -12.04% | 19.88% |
VXUS Vanguard Total International Stock ETF | 13.69% | 32.35% | 5.08% | 15.86% | -16.08% | 8.98% | 10.66% | 21.75% | -14.43% | 27.46% |
Correlation
The correlation between EWA and VXUS is 0.81, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.81 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.83 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.86 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.84 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 28, 2011 | 0.83 |
The correlation between EWA and VXUS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.81 to 0.86 - a consistent structural relationship.
EWA vs. VXUS - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
EWA
VXUS
Financial Services
Basic Materials
Consumer Cyclical
Real Estate
Healthcare
Energy
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Communication Services
Utilities
Technology
Financial Services
EWA
VXUS
Basic Materials
EWA
VXUS
Consumer Cyclical
EWA
VXUS
Real Estate
EWA
VXUS
Healthcare
EWA
VXUS
Energy
EWA
VXUS
Industrials
EWA
VXUS
Consumer Defensive
EWA
VXUS
Communication Services
EWA
VXUS
Utilities
EWA
VXUS
Technology
EWA
VXUS
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EWA vs. VXUS — Risk / Return Rank
EWA
VXUS
EWA vs. VXUS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI-Australia ETF (EWA) and Vanguard Total International Stock ETF (VXUS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| EWA | VXUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.01 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.29 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.14 | 1.33 | -0.19 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.33 | 2.53 | -1.20 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.68 | 9.72 | -6.04 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
EWA vs. VXUS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EWA drawdown since its inception was -66.98%, which is greater than VXUS's maximum drawdown of -35.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EWA and VXUS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EWA | VXUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -66.98% | -35.97% | -31.01% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.01% | -11.27% | +1.26% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -21.91% | -13.58% | -8.33% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.87% | -29.44% | +4.57% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -45.54% | -35.97% | -9.57% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.44% | -1.47% | -1.97% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.32% | -8.21% | -3.11% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.62% | 2.93% | +0.69% |
Volatility
EWA vs. VXUS - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares MSCI-Australia ETF (EWA) is 5.80%, while Vanguard Total International Stock ETF (VXUS) has a volatility of 6.71%. This indicates that EWA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VXUS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EWA | VXUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.80% | 6.71% | -0.91% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.62% | 14.02% | +0.60% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.40% | 16.09% | +1.31% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.80% | 16.21% | +3.59% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.62% | 17.20% | +5.42% |
EWA vs. VXUS - Expense Ratio Comparison
EWA has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than VXUS's 0.05% expense ratio.
Dividends
EWA vs. VXUS - Dividend Comparison
EWA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.88%, more than VXUS's 2.67% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EWA iShares MSCI-Australia ETF | 2.88% | 3.21% | 3.71% | 3.72% | 5.28% | 5.08% | 2.02% | 3.97% | 6.11% | 4.44% | 4.03% | 5.48% |
VXUS Vanguard Total International Stock ETF | 2.67% | 3.18% | 3.37% | 3.24% | 3.09% | 3.10% | 2.14% | 3.06% | 3.18% | 2.73% | 2.93% | 2.83% |
Frequently Asked Questions
EWA and VXUS have a correlation of 0.81, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
VXUS has higher volatility (6.71%) compared to EWA (5.80%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EWA dropped -66.98% vs VXUS's -35.97%.
On 10-year performance, VXUS leads with 10.22% vs 8.75% for EWA. On fees, VXUS is cheaper at 0.05% per year. On volatility, EWA has been the lower-risk option at 5.80%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, VXUS has performed better with a 10.22% return vs 8.75%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VXUS is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for EWA.
EWA has the higher dividend yield at 2.88%, compared with 2.67% for VXUS.
EWA is categorized as Asia Pacific Equities, while VXUS is Global Equities. EWA tracks MSCI Australia Index, while VXUS tracks FTSE Global All Cap ex US Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for EWA and 0.05% for VXUS.
VXUS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.77 vs 0.77), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for EWA and VXUS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer