EW vs. HYHG

Last updated Jun 25, 2026

EW (Edwards Lifesciences Corporation) is a stock, while HYHG (ProShares High Yield-Interest Rate Hedged) is High Yield Bonds fund tracking the Citi High Yield (Treasury Rate-Hedged) Index. Over the past 10 years, EW returned 10.85%/yr vs 6.34%/yr for HYHG. At a 0.29 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

EW vs. HYHG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Edwards Lifesciences Corporation (EW) and ProShares High Yield-Interest Rate Hedged (HYHG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EW achieves a 5.17% return, which is significantly higher than HYHG's 3.51% return. Over the past 10 years, EW has outperformed HYHG with an annualized return of 10.85%, while HYHG has yielded a comparatively lower 6.34% annualized return.

EW

• 1D: 3.12%
• 1M: 4.52%
• YTD: 5.17%
• 6M: 3.91%
• 1Y: 18.21%
• 3Y*: -0.25%
• 5Y*: -2.84%
• 10Y*: 10.85%

HYHG

• 1D: -0.34%
• 1M: 0.37%
• YTD: 3.51%
• 6M: 3.18%
• 1Y: 7.64%
• 3Y*: 9.83%
• 5Y*: 6.93%
• 10Y*: 6.34%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EW vs. HYHG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
EW Edwards Lifesciences Corporation	5.17%	15.16%	-2.91%	2.20%	-42.41%	42.00%	17.32%	52.31%	35.90%	20.29%
HYHG ProShares High Yield-Interest Rate Hedged	3.51%	5.31%	11.41%	14.69%	-1.71%	5.75%	0.16%	12.02%	-1.95%	3.76%

Correlation

The correlation between EW and HYHG is 0.10, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.10
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.14
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.29
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.31
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 23, 2013	0.29

The correlation between EW and HYHG shifts across timeframes, from 0.10 (1 year) to 0.31 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

EW vs. HYHG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EW

EW Risk / Return Rank: 66
EW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 67
EW Sortino Ratio Rank: 63
EW Omega Ratio Rank: 59
EW Calmar Ratio Rank: 70
EW Martin Ratio Rank: 71

HYHG

HYHG Risk / Return Rank: 57
HYHG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 43
HYHG Sortino Ratio Rank: 43
HYHG Omega Ratio Rank: 42
HYHG Calmar Ratio Rank: 80
HYHG Martin Ratio Rank: 75

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EW vs. HYHG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Edwards Lifesciences Corporation (EW) and ProShares High Yield-Interest Rate Hedged (HYHG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	EW	HYHG	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.75	1.37	-0.63
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.27	1.98	-0.71
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.14	1.25	-0.10
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.44	3.80	-2.36
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	3.55	12.68	-9.14

EW vs. HYHG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EW Sharpe Ratio is 0.75, which is lower than the HYHG Sharpe Ratio of 1.37. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EW and HYHG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

EW vs. HYHG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EW drawdown since its inception was -54.32%, which is greater than HYHG's maximum drawdown of -25.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EW and HYHG.

Drawdown Indicators

	EW	HYHG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-54.32%	-25.71%	-28.61%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-12.73%	-2.02%	-10.71%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-37.53%	-7.47%	-30.06%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-54.32%	-9.21%	-45.11%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-54.32%	-25.71%	-28.61%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-31.39%	-0.34%	-31.05%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-14.50%	-3.03%	-11.47%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	5.15%	0.60%	+4.55%

Volatility

EW vs. HYHG - Volatility Comparison

Edwards Lifesciences Corporation (EW) has a higher volatility of 7.56% compared to ProShares High Yield-Interest Rate Hedged (HYHG) at 1.27%. This indicates that EW's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HYHG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	EW	HYHG	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	7.56%	1.27%	+6.29%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	19.23%	4.37%	+14.86%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	24.47%	5.58%	+18.89%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	32.68%	8.17%	+24.51%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	32.27%	9.10%	+23.17%

Dividends

EW vs. HYHG - Dividend Comparison

EW has not paid dividends to shareholders, while HYHG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.75%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
EW Edwards Lifesciences Corporation	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
HYHG ProShares High Yield-Interest Rate Hedged	6.75%	6.97%	6.57%	6.07%	5.58%	4.54%	5.21%	6.06%	6.45%	5.57%	5.37%	6.37%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both EW and HYHG in my portfolio?

EW and HYHG have a correlation of 0.10, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, EW or HYHG?

EW has higher volatility (7.56%) compared to HYHG (1.27%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EW dropped -54.32% vs HYHG's -25.71%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

HYHG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.37 vs 0.75), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.