EW vs. MTD
EW (Edwards Lifesciences Corporation) and MTD (Mettler-Toledo International Inc.) are both stocks. Both are in the Healthcare sector — EW in Medical Devices, MTD in Diagnostics & Research. Over the past 10 years, EW returned 8.56%/yr vs 13.47%/yr for MTD. Their 0.36 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
EW vs. MTD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EW achieves a 0.96% return, which is significantly lower than MTD's 1.59% return. Over the past 10 years, EW has underperformed MTD with an annualized return of 8.56%, while MTD has yielded a comparatively higher 13.47% annualized return.
EW
- 1D
- -0.98%
- 1M
- -8.80%
- 6M
- 5.79%
- YTD
- 0.96%
- 1Y
- 8.50%
- 3Y*
- 1.61%
- 5Y*
- -5.18%
- 10Y*
- 8.56%
- ALL TIME*
- 17.35%
MTD
- 1D
- 2.59%
- 1M
- 8.24%
- 6M
- 3.14%
- YTD
- 1.59%
- 1Y
- 18.30%
- 3Y*
- 3.31%
- 5Y*
- -0.79%
- 10Y*
- 13.47%
- ALL TIME*
- 17.43%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $480.40M | $453.68M | $434.27M | |
| $267.15M | $221.78M | $258.42M |
EW vs. MTD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EW Edwards Lifesciences Corporation | 0.96% | 15.16% | -2.91% | 2.20% | -42.41% | 42.00% | 17.32% | 52.31% | 35.90% | 20.29% |
MTD Mettler-Toledo International Inc. | 1.59% | 13.93% | 0.88% | -16.08% | -14.83% | 48.92% | 43.67% | 40.26% | -8.71% | 48.01% |
Correlation
The correlation between EW and MTD is 0.25, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.25 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.26 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.43 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.44 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 27, 2000 | 0.36 |
The correlation between EW and MTD shifts across timeframes, from 0.25 (1 year) to 0.44 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
EW:
$49.56B
MTD:
$28.62B
EW:
$1.88
MTD:
$44.52
EW:
45.90
MTD:
31.81
EW:
1.47
MTD:
4.88
EW:
7.96
MTD:
6.97
EW:
4.84
MTD:
7.76
EW:
$6.30B
MTD:
$4.13B
EW:
$4.92B
MTD:
$2.45B
EW:
$1.44B
MTD:
$1.27B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EW vs. MTD — Risk / Return Rank
EW
MTD
EW vs. MTD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Edwards Lifesciences Corporation (EW) and Mettler-Toledo International Inc. (MTD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| EW | MTD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.10 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.12 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.08 | 1.11 | -0.03 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.65 | 0.47 | +0.18 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.51 | 1.16 | +0.35 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
EW vs. MTD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EW drawdown since its inception was -54.32%, smaller than the maximum MTD drawdown of -61.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EW and MTD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EW | MTD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -54.32% | -61.43% | +7.11% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.19% | -31.90% | +18.71% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -37.53% | -36.61% | -0.92% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -54.32% | -43.47% | -10.85% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -54.32% | -43.47% | -10.85% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -34.14% | -16.81% | -17.33% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -14.57% | -13.74% | -0.83% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.65% | 12.81% | -7.16% |
Volatility
EW vs. MTD - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Edwards Lifesciences Corporation (EW) is 7.05%, while Mettler-Toledo International Inc. (MTD) has a volatility of 8.87%. This indicates that EW experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MTD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EW | MTD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.05% | 8.87% | -1.82% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 19.74% | 27.24% | -7.50% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 24.34% | 32.65% | -8.31% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 32.70% | 32.43% | +0.27% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 32.23% | 29.85% | +2.38% |
Dividends
EW vs. MTD - Dividend Comparison
Neither EW nor MTD has paid dividends to shareholders.
Financials
EW vs. MTD - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Edwards Lifesciences Corporation and Mettler-Toledo International Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
EW vs. MTD - Profitability Comparison
EW - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Edwards Lifesciences Corporation reported a gross profit of 1.29B and revenue of 1.65B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 78.2%.
MTD - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Mettler-Toledo International Inc. reported a gross profit of 650.22M and revenue of 1.03B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 63.3%.
EW - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Edwards Lifesciences Corporation reported an operating income of 514.70M and revenue of 1.65B, resulting in an operating margin of 31.2%.
MTD - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Mettler-Toledo International Inc. reported an operating income of 309.34M and revenue of 1.03B, resulting in an operating margin of 30.1%.
EW - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Edwards Lifesciences Corporation reported a net income of 380.70M and revenue of 1.65B, resulting in a net margin of 23.1%.
MTD - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Mettler-Toledo International Inc. reported a net income of 232.90M and revenue of 1.03B, resulting in a net margin of 22.7%.
Frequently Asked Questions
EW and MTD have a correlation of 0.25, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
MTD has higher volatility (8.87%) compared to EW (7.05%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EW dropped -54.32% vs MTD's -61.43%.
MTD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.46 vs 0.35), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for EW and MTD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer