EW vs. BAX

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Edwards Lifesciences Corporation (EW) and Baxter International Inc. (BAX).

Performance

EW vs. BAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Edwards Lifesciences Corporation (EW) and Baxter International Inc. (BAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

EW vs. BAX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
EW Edwards Lifesciences Corporation	-6.06%	15.16%	-2.91%	2.20%	-42.41%	42.00%	17.32%	52.31%	35.90%	20.29%
BAX Baxter International Inc.	-12.04%	-33.28%	-22.40%	-21.91%	-39.58%	8.48%	-2.95%	28.40%	2.89%	47.30%

Fundamentals

Market Cap EW : $46.59B BAX : $8.64B
EPS EW : $1.83 BAX : -$1.68
PS Ratio EW : 7.72 BAX : 0.77
PB Ratio EW : 4.51 BAX : 1.41
Total Revenue (TTM) EW : $6.07B BAX : $11.24B
Gross Profit (TTM) EW : $4.74B BAX : $3.71B
EBITDA (TTM) EW : $1.35B BAX : $1.67B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EW achieves a -6.06% return, which is significantly higher than BAX's -12.04% return. Over the past 10 years, EW has outperformed BAX with an annualized return of 10.33%, while BAX has yielded a comparatively lower -7.23% annualized return.

EW

• 1D: 0.73%
• 1M: -7.39%
• YTD: -6.06%
• 6M: 2.97%
• 1Y: 10.49%
• 3Y*: -1.08%
• 5Y*: -0.91%
• 10Y*: 10.33%

BAX

• 1D: 6.33%
• 1M: -17.53%
• YTD: -12.04%
• 6M: -26.14%
• 1Y: -50.25%
• 3Y*: -23.72%
• 5Y*: -26.05%
• 10Y*: -7.23%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

EW vs. BAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EW

EW Risk / Return Rank: 58
EW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 58
EW Sortino Ratio Rank: 52
EW Omega Ratio Rank: 49
EW Calmar Ratio Rank: 64
EW Martin Ratio Rank: 67

BAX

BAX Risk / Return Rank: 6
BAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4
BAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6
BAX Omega Ratio Rank: 5
BAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6
BAX Martin Ratio Rank: 10

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EW vs. BAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Edwards Lifesciences Corporation (EW) and Baxter International Inc. (BAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	EW	BAX	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.44	-1.05	+1.49
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	0.83	-1.43	+2.25
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.10	0.79	+0.31
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.02	-0.93	+1.95
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	2.82	-1.50	+4.32
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

EW vs. BAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EW Sharpe Ratio is 0.44, which is higher than the BAX Sharpe Ratio of -1.05. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EW and BAX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	EW	BAX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.44	-1.05	+1.49
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.03	-0.79	+0.76
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.32	-0.25	+0.57
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.51	0.22	+0.29

Correlation

The correlation between EW and BAX is 0.36, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

EW vs. BAX - Dividend Comparison

EW has not paid dividends to shareholders, while BAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.14%.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
EW Edwards Lifesciences Corporation	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
BAX Baxter International Inc.	2.14%	2.72%	3.57%	3.00%	2.26%	1.26%	1.19%	1.02%	1.11%	0.94%	1.14%	87.05%

Drawdowns

EW vs. BAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EW drawdown since its inception was -54.32%, smaller than the maximum BAX drawdown of -81.15%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EW and BAX.

Drawdown Indicators

	EW	BAX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-54.32%	-81.15%	+26.83%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-12.73%	-52.92%	+40.19%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-54.32%	-80.61%	+26.29%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-54.32%	-81.15%	+26.83%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-38.72%	-79.96%	+41.24%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-14.31%	-21.40%	+7.09%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.59%	33.06%	-28.47%

Volatility

EW vs. BAX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Edwards Lifesciences Corporation (EW) is 7.98%, while Baxter International Inc. (BAX) has a volatility of 13.66%. This indicates that EW experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	EW	BAX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	7.98%	13.66%	-5.68%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	17.39%	34.50%	-17.11%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	24.07%	48.14%	-24.07%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	32.48%	33.11%	-0.63%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	32.59%	28.95%	+3.64%

Financials

EW vs. BAX - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Edwards Lifesciences Corporation and Baxter International Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

EW - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Edwards Lifesciences Corporation reported a gross profit of 1.23B and revenue of 1.57B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 78.3%.

BAX - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Baxter International Inc. reported a gross profit of 870.00M and revenue of 2.97B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 29.3%.

EW - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Edwards Lifesciences Corporation reported an operating income of 370.30M and revenue of 1.57B, resulting in an operating margin of 23.6%.

BAX - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Baxter International Inc. reported an operating income of 117.00M and revenue of 2.97B, resulting in an operating margin of 3.9%.

EW - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Edwards Lifesciences Corporation reported a net income of 91.20M and revenue of 1.57B, resulting in a net margin of 5.8%.

BAX - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Baxter International Inc. reported a net income of -1.11B and revenue of 2.97B, resulting in a net margin of -37.3%.