EVUAX vs. MMUFX

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

EVUAX (Allspring Utility and Telecommunications Fund) and MMUFX (MFS Utilities Fund) are both Utilities Equities funds. Over the past 10 years, EVUAX returned 10.61%/yr vs 8.39%/yr for MMUFX. Their correlation of 0.88 suggests significant overlap in exposure. EVUAX charges 1.04%/yr vs 0.99%/yr for MMUFX.

Performance

EVUAX vs. MMUFX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Allspring Utility and Telecommunications Fund (EVUAX) and MFS Utilities Fund (MMUFX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EVUAX achieves a 3.57% return, which is significantly lower than MMUFX's 4.90% return. Over the past 10 years, EVUAX has outperformed MMUFX with an annualized return of 10.61%, while MMUFX has yielded a comparatively lower 8.39% annualized return.

EVUAX

• 1D: 1.62%
• 1M: -4.61%
• YTD: 3.57%
• 6M: 1.56%
• 1Y: 9.74%
• 3Y*: 12.45%
• 5Y*: 6.76%
• 10Y*: 10.61%

MMUFX

• 1D: 1.85%
• 1M: -5.09%
• YTD: 4.90%
• 6M: 3.38%
• 1Y: 12.60%
• 3Y*: 10.28%
• 5Y*: 7.45%
• 10Y*: 8.39%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EVUAX vs. MMUFX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
EVUAX Allspring Utility and Telecommunications Fund	3.57%	15.41%	17.68%	-5.17%	-3.47%	13.95%	4.19%	54.25%	3.25%	13.66%
MMUFX MFS Utilities Fund	4.90%	14.32%	11.38%	-2.28%	0.35%	13.86%	6.04%	24.91%	0.85%	14.69%

Correlation

The correlation between EVUAX and MMUFX is 0.96 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.96
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.94
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.94
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.89
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 5, 1994	0.88

The correlation between EVUAX and MMUFX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.88 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

EVUAX vs. MMUFX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EVUAX

EVUAX Risk / Return Rank: 10
EVUAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 10
EVUAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9
EVUAX Omega Ratio Rank: 9
EVUAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 14
EVUAX Martin Ratio Rank: 10

MMUFX

MMUFX Risk / Return Rank: 13
MMUFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 11
MMUFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 11
MMUFX Omega Ratio Rank: 11
MMUFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 16
MMUFX Martin Ratio Rank: 14

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EVUAX vs. MMUFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Allspring Utility and Telecommunications Fund (EVUAX) and MFS Utilities Fund (MMUFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	EVUAX	MMUFX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.77	0.89	-0.12
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.11	1.29	-0.18
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.14	1.16	-0.02
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.32	1.46	-0.14
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	3.01	3.89	-0.88
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

EVUAX vs. MMUFX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EVUAX Sharpe Ratio is 0.77, which is comparable to the MMUFX Sharpe Ratio of 0.89. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EVUAX and MMUFX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	EVUAX	MMUFX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.77	0.89	-0.12
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.40	0.47	-0.08
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.56	0.51	+0.05
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.67	0.63	+0.04

Drawdowns

EVUAX vs. MMUFX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EVUAX drawdown since its inception was -56.00%, roughly equal to the maximum MMUFX drawdown of -56.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EVUAX and MMUFX.

Drawdown Indicators

	EVUAX	MMUFX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-56.00%	-56.03%	+0.03%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-7.68%	-8.75%	+1.07%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-14.26%	-17.72%	+3.46%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-23.32%	-21.64%	-1.68%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-31.72%	-35.82%	+4.10%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-5.53%	-7.07%	+1.54%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-9.57%	-8.75%	-0.82%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.36%	3.27%	+0.09%

Volatility

EVUAX vs. MMUFX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Allspring Utility and Telecommunications Fund (EVUAX) is 4.90%, while MFS Utilities Fund (MMUFX) has a volatility of 5.49%. This indicates that EVUAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MMUFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	EVUAX	MMUFX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.90%	5.49%	-0.59%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.68%	11.64%	-0.96%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	13.11%	14.28%	-1.17%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.14%	15.81%	+1.33%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	19.10%	16.64%	+2.46%

EVUAX vs. MMUFX - Expense Ratio Comparison

EVUAX has a 1.04% expense ratio, which is higher than MMUFX's 0.99% expense ratio.

Dividends

EVUAX vs. MMUFX - Dividend Comparison

EVUAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.85%, more than MMUFX's 3.65% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
EVUAX Allspring Utility and Telecommunications Fund	5.85%	6.17%	4.70%	5.76%	11.09%	13.01%	13.60%	35.11%	1.96%	1.75%	1.34%	1.95%
MMUFX MFS Utilities Fund	3.65%	3.83%	3.72%	5.82%	8.68%	5.61%	5.80%	6.85%	4.29%	2.67%	3.72%	9.09%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both EVUAX and MMUFX in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.96, EVUAX and MMUFX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, EVUAX or MMUFX?

MMUFX has higher volatility (5.49%) compared to EVUAX (4.90%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EVUAX dropped -56.00% vs MMUFX's -56.03%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

MMUFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.89 vs 0.77), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.