PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EVTR vs. PLIIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

EVTR vs. PLIIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Eaton Vance Total Return Bond ETF (EVTR) and Pacific Funds Core Income (PLIIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

EVTR vs. PLIIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
EVTR
Eaton Vance Total Return Bond ETF
-0.31%8.10%4.07%
PLIIX
Pacific Funds Core Income
-0.63%7.38%3.15%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EVTR achieves a -0.31% return, which is significantly higher than PLIIX's -0.63% return.


EVTR

1D
0.28%
1M
-2.03%
YTD
-0.31%
6M
0.96%
1Y
4.95%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

PLIIX

1D
0.52%
1M
-2.03%
YTD
-0.63%
6M
0.37%
1Y
4.42%
3Y*
4.53%
5Y*
1.36%
10Y*
2.91%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


EVTR vs. PLIIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

EVTR has a 0.32% expense ratio, which is lower than PLIIX's 0.55% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

EVTR vs. PLIIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EVTR
EVTR Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
EVTR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EVTR Sortino Ratio Rank: 7373
Sortino Ratio Rank
EVTR Omega Ratio Rank: 6464
Omega Ratio Rank
EVTR Calmar Ratio Rank: 7272
Calmar Ratio Rank
EVTR Martin Ratio Rank: 6464
Martin Ratio Rank

PLIIX
PLIIX Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
PLIIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6565
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PLIIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
PLIIX Omega Ratio Rank: 5151
Omega Ratio Rank
PLIIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8282
Calmar Ratio Rank
PLIIX Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EVTR vs. PLIIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Eaton Vance Total Return Bond ETF (EVTR) and Pacific Funds Core Income (PLIIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


EVTRPLIIXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.27

1.15

+0.12

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.79

1.66

+0.13

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.23

1.21

+0.02

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.79

2.01

-0.22

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

6.21

6.56

-0.35

EVTR vs. PLIIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EVTR Sharpe Ratio is 1.27, which is comparable to the PLIIX Sharpe Ratio of 1.15. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EVTR and PLIIX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


EVTRPLIIXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.27

1.15

+0.12

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.26

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.65

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.37

0.90

+0.47

Correlation

The correlation between EVTR and PLIIX is 0.92, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

EVTR vs. PLIIX - Dividend Comparison

EVTR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.63%, more than PLIIX's 4.37% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EVTR
Eaton Vance Total Return Bond ETF
4.63%4.51%4.26%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
PLIIX
Pacific Funds Core Income
4.37%4.81%4.94%4.27%3.32%4.29%3.04%3.07%3.50%2.90%2.96%3.32%

Drawdowns

EVTR vs. PLIIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EVTR drawdown since its inception was -4.08%, smaller than the maximum PLIIX drawdown of -16.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EVTR and PLIIX.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


EVTRPLIIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-4.08%

-16.99%

+12.91%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.85%

-2.54%

-0.31%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.99%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-16.99%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.03%

-2.03%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.92%

-2.33%

+1.41%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.82%

0.78%

+0.04%

Volatility

EVTR vs. PLIIX - Volatility Comparison

Eaton Vance Total Return Bond ETF (EVTR) has a higher volatility of 1.66% compared to Pacific Funds Core Income (PLIIX) at 1.53%. This indicates that EVTR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PLIIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


EVTRPLIIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.66%

1.53%

+0.13%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.42%

2.37%

+0.05%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.91%

3.99%

-0.08%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.31%

5.19%

-0.88%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.31%

4.51%

-0.20%