EVT vs. VDIGX
Compare and contrast key facts about Eaton Vance Tax-Advantaged Dividend Income Fund (EVT) and Vanguard Dividend Growth Fund (VDIGX).
EVT is managed by Eaton Vance. It was launched on Sep 30, 2003. VDIGX is managed by Vanguard. It was launched on May 15, 1992.
Performance
EVT vs. VDIGX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
EVT vs. VDIGX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EVT Eaton Vance Tax-Advantaged Dividend Income Fund | -0.60% | 13.79% | 17.34% | 5.78% | -17.33% | 33.94% | 1.72% | 44.71% | -11.92% | 21.80% |
VDIGX Vanguard Dividend Growth Fund | -5.09% | 11.11% | 20.84% | 8.11% | -4.89% | 24.86% | 12.04% | 30.94% | 0.08% | 19.32% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EVT achieves a -0.60% return, which is significantly higher than VDIGX's -5.09% return. Over the past 10 years, EVT has underperformed VDIGX with an annualized return of 10.72%, while VDIGX has yielded a comparatively higher 11.54% annualized return.
EVT
- 1D
- 2.55%
- 1M
- -6.14%
- YTD
- -0.60%
- 6M
- 4.46%
- 1Y
- 14.47%
- 3Y*
- 11.56%
- 5Y*
- 6.69%
- 10Y*
- 10.72%
VDIGX
- 1D
- 2.04%
- 1M
- -6.43%
- YTD
- -5.09%
- 6M
- -2.58%
- 1Y
- 2.63%
- 3Y*
- 11.22%
- 5Y*
- 9.34%
- 10Y*
- 11.54%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
EVT vs. VDIGX - Expense Ratio Comparison
EVT has a 0.01% expense ratio, which is lower than VDIGX's 0.27% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Return for Risk
EVT vs. VDIGX — Risk / Return Rank
EVT
VDIGX
EVT vs. VDIGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Eaton Vance Tax-Advantaged Dividend Income Fund (EVT) and Vanguard Dividend Growth Fund (VDIGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| EVT | VDIGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.83 | 0.19 | +0.65 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.21 | 0.39 | +0.83 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.19 | 1.05 | +0.14 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.15 | 0.40 | +0.75 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.04 | 1.57 | +3.47 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| EVT | VDIGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.83 | 0.19 | +0.65 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.39 | 0.68 | -0.29 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.52 | 0.74 | -0.22 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.40 | 0.60 | -0.20 |
Correlation
The correlation between EVT and VDIGX is 0.68, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
EVT vs. VDIGX - Dividend Comparison
EVT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.05%, less than VDIGX's 25.87% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EVT Eaton Vance Tax-Advantaged Dividend Income Fund | 8.05% | 7.84% | 8.02% | 8.03% | 8.44% | 5.65% | 7.97% | 6.82% | 9.16% | 6.85% | 8.47% | 7.49% |
VDIGX Vanguard Dividend Growth Fund | 25.87% | 21.90% | 21.94% | 2.29% | 6.06% | 5.45% | 2.83% | 4.70% | 8.72% | 5.16% | 2.86% | 5.70% |
Drawdowns
EVT vs. VDIGX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EVT drawdown since its inception was -74.01%, which is greater than VDIGX's maximum drawdown of -45.23%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EVT and VDIGX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| EVT | VDIGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -74.01% | -45.23% | -28.78% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.02% | -9.57% | -3.45% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -28.23% | -16.18% | -12.05% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -52.03% | -32.98% | -19.05% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.28% | -7.10% | +0.82% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.21% | -6.67% | -4.54% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.98% | 2.45% | +0.53% |
Volatility
EVT vs. VDIGX - Volatility Comparison
Eaton Vance Tax-Advantaged Dividend Income Fund (EVT) has a higher volatility of 5.20% compared to Vanguard Dividend Growth Fund (VDIGX) at 4.19%. This indicates that EVT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VDIGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| EVT | VDIGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.20% | 4.19% | +1.01% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.18% | 7.66% | +1.52% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.43% | 14.50% | +2.93% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.12% | 13.85% | +3.27% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.60% | 15.69% | +4.91% |