PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EVSM vs. IBMM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EVSM vs. IBMM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Eaton Vance Short Duration Municipal Income ETF (EVSM) and iShares iBonds Dec 2024 Term Muni Bond ETF (IBMM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


EVSM

1D
0.06%
1M
0.42%
YTD
1.15%
6M
1.48%
1Y
4.06%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

IBMM

1D
0.00%
1M
0.00%
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EVSM vs. IBMM - Yearly Performance Comparison


Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EVSM vs. IBMM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EVSM
EVSM Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
EVSM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EVSM Sortino Ratio Rank: 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
EVSM Omega Ratio Rank: 9494
Omega Ratio Rank
EVSM Calmar Ratio Rank: 7676
Calmar Ratio Rank
EVSM Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank

IBMM
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EVSM vs. IBMM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Eaton Vance Short Duration Municipal Income ETF (EVSM) and iShares iBonds Dec 2024 Term Muni Bond ETF (IBMM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


EVSMIBMMDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.70

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.79

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.52

EVSM vs. IBMM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


EVSMIBMMDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.23

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.89

Drawdowns

EVSM vs. IBMM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EVSM drawdown since its inception was -1.50%, which is greater than IBMM's maximum drawdown of 0.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EVSM and IBMM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EVSMIBMMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-1.50%

0.00%

-1.50%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.07%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.06%

0.00%

-0.06%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.24%

0.00%

-0.24%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.30%

Volatility

EVSM vs. IBMM - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EVSMIBMMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.33%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

0.83%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.27%

0.00%

+1.27%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

1.92%

0.00%

+1.92%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

1.92%

0.00%

+1.92%

EVSM vs. IBMM - Expense Ratio Comparison

EVSM has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is higher than IBMM's 0.18% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

EVSM vs. IBMM - Dividend Comparison

EVSM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.00%, while IBMM has not paid dividends to shareholders.


Frequently Asked Questions


On fees, IBMM is cheaper at 0.18% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

IBMM is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.19% for EVSM.

EVSM has the higher dividend yield at 3.00%, compared with 0.00% for IBMM.

EVSM tracks ICE BofA 1-3 Year Municipal Securities Index, while IBMM tracks S&P AMT-Free Municipal Series Dec 2024 Index. They also come from different issuers: Eaton Vance and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.19% for EVSM and 0.18% for IBMM.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EVSM and IBMM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer