PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EVSM vs. EVLN
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EVSM vs. EVLN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Eaton Vance Short Duration Municipal Income ETF (EVSM) and Eaton Vance Floating-Rate ETF (EVLN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EVSM achieves a 1.19% return, which is significantly lower than EVLN's 1.49% return.


EVSM

1D
-0.08%
1M
0.56%
YTD
1.19%
6M
1.28%
1Y
3.77%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

EVLN

1D
-0.10%
1M
0.32%
YTD
1.49%
6M
1.59%
1Y
4.65%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EVSM vs. EVLN - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
EVSM
Eaton Vance Short Duration Municipal Income ETF
1.19%4.24%2.43%
EVLN
Eaton Vance Floating-Rate ETF
1.49%5.59%6.32%

Correlation

The correlation between EVSM and EVLN is -0.02, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.02

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 25, 2024

0.04

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EVSM vs. EVLN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EVSM
EVSM Risk / Return Rank: 8484
Overall Rank
EVSM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EVSM Sortino Ratio Rank: 9494
Sortino Ratio Rank
EVSM Omega Ratio Rank: 9393
Omega Ratio Rank
EVSM Calmar Ratio Rank: 7272
Calmar Ratio Rank
EVSM Martin Ratio Rank: 7070
Martin Ratio Rank

EVLN
EVLN Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
EVLN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8181
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EVLN Sortino Ratio Rank: 9191
Sortino Ratio Rank
EVLN Omega Ratio Rank: 8888
Omega Ratio Rank
EVLN Calmar Ratio Rank: 5555
Calmar Ratio Rank
EVLN Martin Ratio Rank: 5252
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EVSM vs. EVLN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Eaton Vance Short Duration Municipal Income ETF (EVSM) and Eaton Vance Floating-Rate ETF (EVLN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


EVSMEVLNDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.50

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.57

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.63

1.53

+0.10

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.52

2.64

+0.88

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.53

8.61

+3.92

EVSM vs. EVLN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EVSM Sharpe Ratio is 3.00, which is comparable to the EVLN Sharpe Ratio of 2.50. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EVSM and EVLN, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

EVSM vs. EVLN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EVSM drawdown since its inception was -1.50%, smaller than the maximum EVLN drawdown of -2.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EVSM and EVLN.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EVSMEVLNDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-1.50%

-2.78%

+1.28%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.07%

-1.77%

+0.70%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.08%

-0.10%

+0.02%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.24%

-0.21%

-0.03%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.30%

0.54%

-0.24%

Volatility

EVSM vs. EVLN - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Eaton Vance Short Duration Municipal Income ETF (EVSM) is 0.33%, while Eaton Vance Floating-Rate ETF (EVLN) has a volatility of 0.41%. This indicates that EVSM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EVLN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EVSMEVLNDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.33%

0.41%

-0.08%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

0.84%

1.64%

-0.80%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.27%

1.88%

-0.61%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

1.91%

2.41%

-0.50%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

1.91%

2.41%

-0.50%

EVSM vs. EVLN - Expense Ratio Comparison

EVSM has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is lower than EVLN's 0.60% expense ratio.


Dividends

EVSM vs. EVLN - Dividend Comparison

EVSM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.00%, less than EVLN's 6.91% yield.


PositionTTM20252024
EVLN
Eaton Vance Floating-Rate ETF
6.91%7.28%6.41%
EVSM
Eaton Vance Short Duration Municipal Income ETF
3.00%3.12%2.99%

Frequently Asked Questions


EVSM and EVLN have a correlation of -0.02, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

EVLN has higher volatility (0.41%) compared to EVSM (0.33%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EVSM dropped -1.50% vs EVLN's -2.78%.

On 1-year performance, EVLN leads with 4.65% vs 3.77% for EVSM. On fees, EVSM is cheaper at 0.19% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, EVLN has performed better with a 4.65% return vs 3.77%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

EVSM is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for EVLN.

EVLN has the higher dividend yield at 6.91%, compared with 3.00% for EVSM.

EVSM is categorized as Municipal Bonds, while EVLN is Bank Loan. Their fees differ too: 0.19% for EVSM and 0.60% for EVLN.

EVSM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.00 vs 2.50), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EVSM and EVLN

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer