EVSB vs. UMI

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

EVSB (Eaton Vance Ultra-Short Income ETF) and UMI (USCF Midstream Energy Income Fund ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - EVSB is a Ultrashort Bond fund actively managed by Eaton Vance, while UMI is a Energy Equities fund actively managed by Wainwright, Inc.. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, EVSB returned 4.69% vs 27.12% for UMI. At a 0.02 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. EVSB charges 0.17%/yr vs 0.85%/yr for UMI.

Performance

EVSB vs. UMI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Eaton Vance Ultra-Short Income ETF (EVSB) and USCF Midstream Energy Income Fund ETF (UMI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EVSB achieves a 1.73% return, which is significantly lower than UMI's 24.04% return.

EVSB

• 1D: 0.07%
• 1M: 0.39%
• YTD: 1.73%
• 6M: 2.08%
• 1Y: 4.69%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

UMI

• 1D: 1.24%
• 1M: 0.83%
• YTD: 24.04%
• 6M: 22.07%
• 1Y: 27.12%
• 3Y*: 27.84%
• 5Y*: 20.58%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EVSB vs. UMI - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
EVSB Eaton Vance Ultra-Short Income ETF	1.73%	5.12%	6.04%	1.84%
UMI USCF Midstream Energy Income Fund ETF	24.04%	5.11%	42.97%	2.42%

Correlation

The correlation between EVSB and UMI is -0.11, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.11
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 20, 2023	0.02

The correlation between EVSB and UMI shifts across timeframes, from -0.11 (1 year) to 0.02 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

EVSB vs. UMI - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	EVSB	UMI
Financial Services	0.3%	-
Basic Materials	-	-
Communication Services	-	-
Consumer Cyclical	-	-
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Energy	-	99.0%
Healthcare	-	-
Industrials	-	-
Real Estate	-	-
Technology	-	-
Utilities	-	1.0%

Return for Risk

EVSB vs. UMI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EVSB

EVSB Risk / Return Rank: 99
EVSB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 98
EVSB Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
EVSB Omega Ratio Rank: 99
EVSB Calmar Ratio Rank: 98
EVSB Martin Ratio Rank: 99

UMI

UMI Risk / Return Rank: 61
UMI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 59
UMI Sortino Ratio Rank: 57
UMI Omega Ratio Rank: 56
UMI Calmar Ratio Rank: 73
UMI Martin Ratio Rank: 58

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EVSB vs. UMI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Eaton Vance Ultra-Short Income ETF (EVSB) and USCF Midstream Energy Income Fund ETF (UMI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	EVSB	UMI	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	6.10	1.95	+4.15
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	10.68	2.66	+8.02
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	2.75	1.34	+1.41
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	18.53	3.63	+14.89
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	108.58	10.06	+98.52
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

EVSB vs. UMI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EVSB Sharpe Ratio is 6.10, which is higher than the UMI Sharpe Ratio of 1.95. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EVSB and UMI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	EVSB	UMI	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	6.10	1.95	+4.15
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	1.06	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	6.97	0.63	+6.33

Drawdowns

EVSB vs. UMI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EVSB drawdown since its inception was -0.31%, smaller than the maximum UMI drawdown of -48.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EVSB and UMI.

Drawdown Indicators

	EVSB	UMI	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-0.31%	-48.08%	+47.77%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-0.25%	-7.50%	+7.25%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-17.08%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-20.05%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-3.58%	+3.58%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.02%	-6.60%	+6.58%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.04%	2.70%	-2.66%

Volatility

EVSB vs. UMI - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Eaton Vance Ultra-Short Income ETF (EVSB) is 0.19%, while USCF Midstream Energy Income Fund ETF (UMI) has a volatility of 6.04%. This indicates that EVSB experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than UMI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	EVSB	UMI	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.19%	6.04%	-5.85%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	0.51%	10.94%	-10.43%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.78%	14.06%	-13.28%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	0.82%	19.54%	-18.72%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	0.82%	23.19%	-22.37%

EVSB vs. UMI - Expense Ratio Comparison

EVSB has a 0.17% expense ratio, which is lower than UMI's 0.85% expense ratio.

Dividends

EVSB vs. UMI - Dividend Comparison

EVSB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.62%, less than UMI's 5.91% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
EVSB Eaton Vance Ultra-Short Income ETF	4.62%	4.63%	5.18%	1.21%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
UMI USCF Midstream Energy Income Fund ETF	5.91%	6.23%	4.39%	4.67%	4.36%	3.00%	2.18%	2.47%	2.48%	0.15%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both EVSB and UMI in my portfolio?

EVSB and UMI have a correlation of -0.11, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, EVSB or UMI?

UMI has higher volatility (6.04%) compared to EVSB (0.19%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EVSB dropped -0.31% vs UMI's -48.08%.

Which ETF is better, EVSB or UMI?

On 1-year performance, UMI leads with 27.12% vs 4.69% for EVSB. On fees, EVSB is cheaper at 0.17% per year. On volatility, EVSB has been the lower-risk option at 0.19%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, EVSB or UMI?

Over the 1-year period, UMI has performed better with a 27.12% return vs 4.69%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, EVSB or UMI?

EVSB is cheaper with a 0.17% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for UMI.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, EVSB or UMI?

UMI has the higher dividend yield at 5.91%, compared with 4.62% for EVSB.

What is the main difference between EVSB and UMI?

EVSB is categorized as Ultrashort Bond, while UMI is Energy Equities. They also come from different issuers: Eaton Vance and Wainwright, Inc.. Their fees differ too: 0.17% for EVSB and 0.85% for UMI.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

EVSB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (6.10 vs 1.95), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.