PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EVSB vs. EVLN
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EVSB vs. EVLN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Eaton Vance Ultra-Short Income ETF (EVSB) and Eaton Vance Floating-Rate ETF (EVLN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EVSB achieves a 1.73% return, which is significantly higher than EVLN's 1.45% return.


EVSB

1D
0.07%
1M
0.39%
YTD
1.73%
6M
2.08%
1Y
4.69%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

EVLN

1D
0.08%
1M
0.59%
YTD
1.45%
6M
1.70%
1Y
4.93%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EVSB vs. EVLN - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
EVSB
Eaton Vance Ultra-Short Income ETF
1.73%5.12%5.40%
EVLN
Eaton Vance Floating-Rate ETF
1.45%5.59%7.29%

Correlation

The correlation between EVSB and EVLN is 0.06, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.06

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 9, 2024

0.06

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EVSB vs. EVLN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EVSB
EVSB Risk / Return Rank: 9999
Overall Rank
EVSB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EVSB Sortino Ratio Rank: 9999
Sortino Ratio Rank
EVSB Omega Ratio Rank: 9999
Omega Ratio Rank
EVSB Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
EVSB Martin Ratio Rank: 9999
Martin Ratio Rank

EVLN
EVLN Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
EVLN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8282
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EVLN Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
EVLN Omega Ratio Rank: 8989
Omega Ratio Rank
EVLN Calmar Ratio Rank: 5757
Calmar Ratio Rank
EVLN Martin Ratio Rank: 5454
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EVSB vs. EVLN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Eaton Vance Ultra-Short Income ETF (EVSB) and Eaton Vance Floating-Rate ETF (EVLN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


EVSBEVLNDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+3.46

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+6.23

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

2.75

1.56

+1.19

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

18.53

2.80

+15.73

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

108.58

9.13

+99.45

EVSB vs. EVLN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EVSB Sharpe Ratio is 6.10, which is higher than the EVLN Sharpe Ratio of 2.64. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EVSB and EVLN, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


EVSBEVLNDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

6.10

2.64

+3.46

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

6.97

2.56

+4.40

Drawdowns

EVSB vs. EVLN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EVSB drawdown since its inception was -0.31%, smaller than the maximum EVLN drawdown of -2.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EVSB and EVLN.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EVSBEVLNDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-0.31%

-2.78%

+2.47%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-0.25%

-1.77%

+1.52%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.02%

-0.22%

+0.20%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.04%

0.54%

-0.50%

Volatility

EVSB vs. EVLN - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Eaton Vance Ultra-Short Income ETF (EVSB) is 0.19%, while Eaton Vance Floating-Rate ETF (EVLN) has a volatility of 0.45%. This indicates that EVSB experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EVLN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EVSBEVLNDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.19%

0.45%

-0.26%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

0.51%

1.62%

-1.11%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.78%

1.87%

-1.09%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

0.82%

2.43%

-1.61%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

0.82%

2.43%

-1.61%

EVSB vs. EVLN - Expense Ratio Comparison

EVSB has a 0.17% expense ratio, which is lower than EVLN's 0.60% expense ratio.


Dividends

EVSB vs. EVLN - Dividend Comparison

EVSB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.62%, less than EVLN's 6.91% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023
EVLN
Eaton Vance Floating-Rate ETF
6.91%7.28%6.41%0.00%
EVSB
Eaton Vance Ultra-Short Income ETF
4.62%4.63%5.18%1.21%

Frequently Asked Questions


EVSB and EVLN have a correlation of 0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

EVLN has higher volatility (0.45%) compared to EVSB (0.19%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EVSB dropped -0.31% vs EVLN's -2.78%.

On 1-year performance, EVLN leads with 4.93% vs 4.69% for EVSB. On fees, EVSB is cheaper at 0.17% per year. On volatility, EVSB has been the lower-risk option at 0.19%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, EVLN has performed better with a 4.93% return vs 4.69%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

EVSB is cheaper with a 0.17% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for EVLN.

EVLN has the higher dividend yield at 6.91%, compared with 4.62% for EVSB.

EVSB is categorized as Ultrashort Bond, while EVLN is Bank Loan. Their fees differ too: 0.17% for EVSB and 0.60% for EVLN.

EVSB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (6.10 vs 2.64), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EVSB and EVLN

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer