EVSB vs. EVLN
EVSB (Eaton Vance Ultra-Short Income ETF) and EVLN (Eaton Vance Floating-Rate ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - EVSB is a Ultrashort Bond fund actively managed by Eaton Vance, while EVLN is a Bank Loan fund actively managed by Eaton Vance. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, EVSB returned 4.69% vs 4.93% for EVLN. At a 0.06 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. EVSB charges 0.17%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for EVLN.
Performance
EVSB vs. EVLN - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EVSB achieves a 1.73% return, which is significantly higher than EVLN's 1.45% return.
EVSB
- 1D
- 0.07%
- 1M
- 0.39%
- YTD
- 1.73%
- 6M
- 2.08%
- 1Y
- 4.69%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
EVLN
- 1D
- 0.08%
- 1M
- 0.59%
- YTD
- 1.45%
- 6M
- 1.70%
- 1Y
- 4.93%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
EVSB vs. EVLN - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
EVSB Eaton Vance Ultra-Short Income ETF | 1.73% | 5.12% | 5.40% |
EVLN Eaton Vance Floating-Rate ETF | 1.45% | 5.59% | 7.29% |
Correlation
The correlation between EVSB and EVLN is 0.06, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.06 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 9, 2024 | 0.06 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EVSB vs. EVLN — Risk / Return Rank
EVSB
EVLN
EVSB vs. EVLN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Eaton Vance Ultra-Short Income ETF (EVSB) and Eaton Vance Floating-Rate ETF (EVLN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| EVSB | EVLN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +3.46 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +6.23 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 2.75 | 1.56 | +1.19 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 18.53 | 2.80 | +15.73 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 108.58 | 9.13 | +99.45 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| EVSB | EVLN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 6.10 | 2.64 | +3.46 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 6.97 | 2.56 | +4.40 |
Drawdowns
EVSB vs. EVLN - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EVSB drawdown since its inception was -0.31%, smaller than the maximum EVLN drawdown of -2.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EVSB and EVLN.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EVSB | EVLN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -0.31% | -2.78% | +2.47% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -0.25% | -1.77% | +1.52% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.02% | -0.22% | +0.20% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.04% | 0.54% | -0.50% |
Volatility
EVSB vs. EVLN - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Eaton Vance Ultra-Short Income ETF (EVSB) is 0.19%, while Eaton Vance Floating-Rate ETF (EVLN) has a volatility of 0.45%. This indicates that EVSB experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EVLN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EVSB | EVLN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.19% | 0.45% | -0.26% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 0.51% | 1.62% | -1.11% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.78% | 1.87% | -1.09% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 0.82% | 2.43% | -1.61% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 0.82% | 2.43% | -1.61% |
EVSB vs. EVLN - Expense Ratio Comparison
EVSB has a 0.17% expense ratio, which is lower than EVLN's 0.60% expense ratio.
Dividends
EVSB vs. EVLN - Dividend Comparison
EVSB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.62%, less than EVLN's 6.91% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
EVLN Eaton Vance Floating-Rate ETF | 6.91% | 7.28% | 6.41% | 0.00% |
EVSB Eaton Vance Ultra-Short Income ETF | 4.62% | 4.63% | 5.18% | 1.21% |
Frequently Asked Questions
EVSB and EVLN have a correlation of 0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
EVLN has higher volatility (0.45%) compared to EVSB (0.19%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EVSB dropped -0.31% vs EVLN's -2.78%.
On 1-year performance, EVLN leads with 4.93% vs 4.69% for EVSB. On fees, EVSB is cheaper at 0.17% per year. On volatility, EVSB has been the lower-risk option at 0.19%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, EVLN has performed better with a 4.93% return vs 4.69%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
EVSB is cheaper with a 0.17% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for EVLN.
EVLN has the higher dividend yield at 6.91%, compared with 4.62% for EVSB.
EVSB is categorized as Ultrashort Bond, while EVLN is Bank Loan. Their fees differ too: 0.17% for EVSB and 0.60% for EVLN.
EVSB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (6.10 vs 2.64), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for EVSB and EVLN
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer