PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EVSB vs. BNDW
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

EVSB vs. BNDW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Eaton Vance Ultra-Short Income ETF (EVSB) and Vanguard Total World Bond ETF (BNDW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

EVSB vs. BNDW - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
EVSB
Eaton Vance Ultra-Short Income ETF
0.90%5.12%6.04%1.84%
BNDW
Vanguard Total World Bond ETF
-0.03%5.02%2.42%8.24%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EVSB achieves a 0.90% return, which is significantly higher than BNDW's -0.03% return.


EVSB

1D
0.04%
1M
0.16%
YTD
0.90%
6M
2.04%
1Y
4.69%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

BNDW

1D
0.35%
1M
-1.98%
YTD
-0.03%
6M
0.57%
1Y
3.50%
3Y*
3.73%
5Y*
0.20%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


EVSB vs. BNDW - Expense Ratio Comparison

EVSB has a 0.17% expense ratio, which is higher than BNDW's 0.05% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Return for Risk

EVSB vs. BNDW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EVSB
EVSB Risk / Return Rank: 9999
Overall Rank
EVSB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9999
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EVSB Sortino Ratio Rank: 9999
Sortino Ratio Rank
EVSB Omega Ratio Rank: 9999
Omega Ratio Rank
EVSB Calmar Ratio Rank: 9999
Calmar Ratio Rank
EVSB Martin Ratio Rank: 9999
Martin Ratio Rank

BNDW
BNDW Risk / Return Rank: 5656
Overall Rank
BNDW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BNDW Sortino Ratio Rank: 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
BNDW Omega Ratio Rank: 4949
Omega Ratio Rank
BNDW Calmar Ratio Rank: 5858
Calmar Ratio Rank
BNDW Martin Ratio Rank: 5656
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EVSB vs. BNDW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Eaton Vance Ultra-Short Income ETF (EVSB) and Vanguard Total World Bond ETF (BNDW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


EVSBBNDWDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

5.33

1.00

+4.34

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

8.80

1.40

+7.40

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

2.52

1.18

+1.34

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

15.04

1.34

+13.70

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

85.60

4.97

+80.62

EVSB vs. BNDW - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EVSB Sharpe Ratio is 5.33, which is higher than the BNDW Sharpe Ratio of 1.00. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EVSB and BNDW, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


EVSBBNDWDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.33

1.00

+4.34

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.04

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

6.97

0.37

+6.60

Correlation

The correlation between EVSB and BNDW is 0.33, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

EVSB vs. BNDW - Dividend Comparison

EVSB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.68%, more than BNDW's 4.16% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018
EVSB
Eaton Vance Ultra-Short Income ETF
4.68%4.63%5.18%1.21%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
BNDW
Vanguard Total World Bond ETF
4.16%4.12%3.90%3.73%2.02%2.58%1.56%3.05%1.66%

Drawdowns

EVSB vs. BNDW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EVSB drawdown since its inception was -0.31%, smaller than the maximum BNDW drawdown of -17.22%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EVSB and BNDW.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


EVSBBNDWDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-0.31%

-17.22%

+16.91%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-0.31%

-2.70%

+2.39%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.93%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-1.98%

+1.98%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.02%

-5.05%

+5.03%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.06%

0.72%

-0.66%

Volatility

EVSB vs. BNDW - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Eaton Vance Ultra-Short Income ETF (EVSB) is 0.22%, while Vanguard Total World Bond ETF (BNDW) has a volatility of 1.66%. This indicates that EVSB experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BNDW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


EVSBBNDWDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.22%

1.66%

-1.44%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

0.50%

2.28%

-1.78%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.88%

3.53%

-2.65%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

0.83%

5.17%

-4.34%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

0.83%

4.92%

-4.09%