EVSB vs. CSHP
EVSB (Eaton Vance Ultra-Short Income ETF) and CSHP (iShares Enhanced Short-Term Bond Active ETF) are both Ultrashort Bond funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, EVSB returned 4.71% vs 3.96% for CSHP. At a correlation of -0.02, they often move in opposite directions. EVSB charges 0.17%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for CSHP.
Performance
EVSB vs. CSHP - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with EVSB having a 1.66% return and CSHP slightly lower at 1.63%.
EVSB
- 1D
- -0.01%
- 1M
- 0.40%
- YTD
- 1.66%
- 6M
- 2.00%
- 1Y
- 4.71%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CSHP
- 1D
- 0.02%
- 1M
- 0.27%
- YTD
- 1.63%
- 6M
- 1.93%
- 1Y
- 3.96%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
EVSB vs. CSHP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
EVSB Eaton Vance Ultra-Short Income ETF | 1.66% | 5.12% | 2.71% |
CSHP iShares Enhanced Short-Term Bond Active ETF | 1.63% | 4.10% | 2.24% |
Correlation
The correlation between EVSB and CSHP is 0.03, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.03 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 19, 2024 | -0.02 |
EVSB vs. CSHP - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
EVSB
CSHP
Financial Services
Basic Materials
-
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Industrials
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Financial Services
EVSB
CSHP
Basic Materials
EVSB
-
CSHP
-
Communication Services
EVSB
-
CSHP
-
Consumer Cyclical
EVSB
-
CSHP
-
Consumer Defensive
EVSB
-
CSHP
-
Energy
EVSB
-
CSHP
-
Healthcare
EVSB
-
CSHP
-
Industrials
EVSB
-
CSHP
-
Real Estate
EVSB
-
CSHP
-
Technology
EVSB
-
CSHP
-
Utilities
EVSB
-
CSHP
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EVSB vs. CSHP — Risk / Return Rank
EVSB
CSHP
EVSB vs. CSHP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Eaton Vance Ultra-Short Income ETF (EVSB) and iShares Enhanced Short-Term Bond Active ETF (CSHP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| EVSB | CSHP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -5.79 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -20.54 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 2.76 | 7.44 | -4.68 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 18.60 | 65.71 | -47.10 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 109.03 | 432.16 | -323.13 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| EVSB | CSHP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 6.11 | 11.91 | -5.79 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 6.94 | 10.75 | -3.81 |
Drawdowns
EVSB vs. CSHP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EVSB drawdown since its inception was -0.31%, which is greater than CSHP's maximum drawdown of -0.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EVSB and CSHP.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EVSB | CSHP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -0.31% | -0.08% | -0.23% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -0.25% | -0.06% | -0.19% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.05% | 0.00% | -0.05% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.02% | -0.00% | -0.02% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.04% | 0.01% | +0.03% |
Volatility
EVSB vs. CSHP - Volatility Comparison
Eaton Vance Ultra-Short Income ETF (EVSB) has a higher volatility of 0.19% compared to iShares Enhanced Short-Term Bond Active ETF (CSHP) at 0.07%. This indicates that EVSB's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CSHP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EVSB | CSHP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.19% | 0.07% | +0.12% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 0.51% | 0.24% | +0.27% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.77% | 0.33% | +0.44% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 0.82% | 0.40% | +0.42% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 0.82% | 0.40% | +0.42% |
EVSB vs. CSHP - Expense Ratio Comparison
EVSB has a 0.17% expense ratio, which is lower than CSHP's 0.20% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
EVSB vs. CSHP - Dividend Comparison
EVSB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.63%, more than CSHP's 3.92% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
CSHP iShares Enhanced Short-Term Bond Active ETF | 3.92% | 5.39% | 1.96% | 0.00% |
EVSB Eaton Vance Ultra-Short Income ETF | 4.63% | 4.63% | 5.18% | 1.21% |
Frequently Asked Questions
EVSB and CSHP have a correlation of 0.03, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
EVSB has higher volatility (0.19%) compared to CSHP (0.07%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EVSB dropped -0.31% vs CSHP's -0.08%.
On 1-year performance, EVSB leads with 4.71% vs 3.96% for CSHP. On fees, EVSB is cheaper at 0.17% per year. On volatility, CSHP has been the lower-risk option at 0.07%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, EVSB has performed better with a 4.71% return vs 3.96%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
EVSB is cheaper with a 0.17% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for CSHP.
EVSB has the higher dividend yield at 4.63%, compared with 3.92% for CSHP.
They also come from different issuers: Eaton Vance and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.17% for EVSB and 0.20% for CSHP.
CSHP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (11.91 vs 6.11), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for EVSB and CSHP
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer