EVSAX vs. MNTRX
Compare and contrast key facts about Allspring Disciplined U.S. Core Fund (EVSAX) and Allspring Core Bond Fund (MNTRX).
EVSAX is managed by Allspring Global Investments. It was launched on Feb 28, 1990. MNTRX is managed by Allspring Global Investments. It was launched on Jun 30, 1997.
Performance
EVSAX vs. MNTRX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
EVSAX vs. MNTRX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EVSAX Allspring Disciplined U.S. Core Fund | -3.97% | 18.65% | 29.20% | 25.97% | -18.21% | 30.35% | 15.95% | 31.87% | -8.43% | 20.47% |
MNTRX Allspring Core Bond Fund | -0.34% | 7.16% | 1.38% | 5.37% | -13.82% | -2.10% | 8.51% | 8.18% | -0.57% | 3.28% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EVSAX achieves a -3.97% return, which is significantly lower than MNTRX's -0.34% return. Over the past 10 years, EVSAX has outperformed MNTRX with an annualized return of 13.81%, while MNTRX has yielded a comparatively lower 1.46% annualized return.
EVSAX
- 1D
- 2.98%
- 1M
- -4.45%
- YTD
- -3.97%
- 6M
- -1.73%
- 1Y
- 19.59%
- 3Y*
- 19.88%
- 5Y*
- 12.61%
- 10Y*
- 13.81%
MNTRX
- 1D
- 0.27%
- 1M
- -1.68%
- YTD
- -0.34%
- 6M
- 0.31%
- 1Y
- 3.61%
- 3Y*
- 3.39%
- 5Y*
- -0.15%
- 10Y*
- 1.46%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
EVSAX vs. MNTRX - Expense Ratio Comparison
EVSAX has a 0.86% expense ratio, which is higher than MNTRX's 0.70% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
EVSAX vs. MNTRX — Risk / Return Rank
EVSAX
MNTRX
EVSAX vs. MNTRX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Allspring Disciplined U.S. Core Fund (EVSAX) and Allspring Core Bond Fund (MNTRX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| EVSAX | MNTRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.10 | 0.89 | +0.22 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.67 | 1.27 | +0.40 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.25 | 1.16 | +0.09 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.77 | 1.44 | +0.33 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.49 | 4.19 | +4.29 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| EVSAX | MNTRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.10 | 0.89 | +0.22 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.72 | -0.03 | +0.75 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.75 | 0.30 | +0.46 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.47 | 0.92 | -0.45 |
Correlation
The correlation between EVSAX and MNTRX is -0.15. This indicates that the assets' prices tend to move in opposite directions. Negative correlation can be particularly beneficial for diversification and risk management, as one asset may offset the losses of the other during market fluctuations.
Dividends
EVSAX vs. MNTRX - Dividend Comparison
EVSAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.77%, more than MNTRX's 3.74% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EVSAX Allspring Disciplined U.S. Core Fund | 5.77% | 5.54% | 6.61% | 9.22% | 14.46% | 8.22% | 9.22% | 6.68% | 7.11% | 4.31% | 2.43% | 11.99% |
MNTRX Allspring Core Bond Fund | 3.74% | 4.07% | 4.13% | 3.19% | 1.85% | 1.75% | 6.35% | 2.46% | 2.33% | 1.74% | 1.97% | 1.45% |
Drawdowns
EVSAX vs. MNTRX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EVSAX drawdown since its inception was -53.73%, which is greater than MNTRX's maximum drawdown of -19.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EVSAX and MNTRX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| EVSAX | MNTRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -53.73% | -19.36% | -34.37% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.69% | -2.82% | -8.87% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -27.72% | -18.91% | -8.81% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -33.03% | -19.36% | -13.67% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.93% | -3.75% | -2.18% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.78% | -2.45% | -7.33% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.44% | 0.97% | +1.47% |
Volatility
EVSAX vs. MNTRX - Volatility Comparison
Allspring Disciplined U.S. Core Fund (EVSAX) has a higher volatility of 5.30% compared to Allspring Core Bond Fund (MNTRX) at 1.58%. This indicates that EVSAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MNTRX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| EVSAX | MNTRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.30% | 1.58% | +3.72% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.82% | 2.63% | +7.19% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.35% | 4.41% | +13.94% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.59% | 6.00% | +11.59% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.37% | 4.94% | +13.43% |