PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EVSAX vs. PRPFX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EVSAX vs. PRPFX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Allspring Disciplined U.S. Core Fund (EVSAX) and Permanent Portfolio Class I (PRPFX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EVSAX achieves a 9.91% return, which is significantly higher than PRPFX's 2.08% return. Over the past 10 years, EVSAX has outperformed PRPFX with an annualized return of 14.85%, while PRPFX has yielded a comparatively lower 9.97% annualized return.


EVSAX

1D
1.89%
1M
-0.49%
6M
8.44%
YTD
9.91%
1Y
21.90%
3Y*
20.50%
5Y*
13.73%
10Y*
14.85%
ALL TIME*
9.03%

PRPFX

1D
0.71%
1M
-0.17%
6M
-2.57%
YTD
2.08%
1Y
15.83%
3Y*
17.56%
5Y*
10.89%
10Y*
9.97%
ALL TIME*
7.00%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

EVSAX vs. PRPFX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
EVSAX
Allspring Disciplined U.S. Core Fund
9.91%18.65%29.20%25.97%-18.21%30.35%15.95%31.87%-8.43%20.47%
PRPFX
Permanent Portfolio Class I
2.08%28.78%19.36%11.96%-5.48%10.87%18.80%19.20%-7.02%11.42%

Correlation

The correlation between EVSAX and PRPFX is 0.58, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.58

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.60

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.66

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.66

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 28, 1990

0.59

The correlation between EVSAX and PRPFX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.58 to 0.66 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EVSAX vs. PRPFX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

EVSAX
EVSAX Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
EVSAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6161
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EVSAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5959
Sortino Ratio Rank
EVSAX Omega Ratio Rank: 5757
Omega Ratio Rank
EVSAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7070
Calmar Ratio Rank
EVSAX Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank

PRPFX
PRPFX Risk / Return Rank: 3838
Overall Rank
PRPFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4242
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PRPFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3434
Sortino Ratio Rank
PRPFX Omega Ratio Rank: 4848
Omega Ratio Rank
PRPFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4141
Calmar Ratio Rank
PRPFX Martin Ratio Rank: 2626
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

EVSAX vs. PRPFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Allspring Disciplined U.S. Core Fund (EVSAX) and Permanent Portfolio Class I (PRPFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


EVSAXPRPFXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.30

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.56

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

1.23

+0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.28

1.60

+0.69

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.67

3.56

+6.10

EVSAX vs. PRPFX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EVSAX Sharpe Ratio is 1.49, which is comparable to the PRPFX Sharpe Ratio of 1.19. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EVSAX and PRPFX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

EVSAX vs. PRPFX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EVSAX drawdown since its inception was -53.73%, which is greater than PRPFX's maximum drawdown of -27.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EVSAX and PRPFX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EVSAXPRPFXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-53.73%

-27.16%

-26.57%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.65%

-9.74%

+1.09%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.00%

-9.74%

-9.26%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.72%

-15.49%

-12.23%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.03%

-20.84%

-12.19%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.03%

-8.67%

+6.64%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.71%

-3.54%

-6.17%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.04%

4.35%

-2.31%

Volatility

EVSAX vs. PRPFX - Volatility Comparison

Allspring Disciplined U.S. Core Fund (EVSAX) has a higher volatility of 3.77% compared to Permanent Portfolio Class I (PRPFX) at 2.42%. This indicates that EVSAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PRPFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EVSAXPRPFXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.77%

2.42%

+1.35%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.43%

10.97%

-0.54%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.30%

13.09%

+0.21%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.71%

11.12%

+6.59%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.41%

10.68%

+7.73%

EVSAX vs. PRPFX - Expense Ratio Comparison

EVSAX has a 0.86% expense ratio, which is higher than PRPFX's 0.81% expense ratio.


Dividends

EVSAX vs. PRPFX - Dividend Comparison

EVSAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.04%, more than PRPFX's 3.20% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EVSAX
Allspring Disciplined U.S. Core Fund
5.04%5.54%6.61%9.22%14.46%8.22%9.22%6.68%7.11%4.31%2.43%11.99%
PRPFX
Permanent Portfolio Class I
3.20%3.27%1.86%1.39%1.58%2.05%5.38%4.69%6.90%2.14%0.95%7.06%

Frequently Asked Questions


EVSAX and PRPFX have a correlation of 0.58, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

EVSAX has higher volatility (3.77%) compared to PRPFX (2.42%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EVSAX dropped -53.73% vs PRPFX's -27.16%.

EVSAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.49 vs 1.19), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EVSAX and PRPFX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer