EVMT vs. SPHD

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

EVMT (Invesco Electric Vehicle Metals Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF) and SPHD (Invesco S&P 500® High Dividend Low Volatility ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - EVMT is a Commodities fund actively managed by Invesco, while SPHD is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P Low Volatility High Dividend index. EVMT is actively managed, while SPHD is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, EVMT returned 4.71%/yr vs 11.42%/yr for SPHD. At a 0.18 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. EVMT charges 0.59%/yr vs 0.30%/yr for SPHD.

Performance

EVMT vs. SPHD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco Electric Vehicle Metals Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF (EVMT) and Invesco S&P 500® High Dividend Low Volatility ETF (SPHD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EVMT achieves a 13.45% return, which is significantly higher than SPHD's 4.38% return.

EVMT

• 1D: -1.66%
• 1M: 2.45%
• YTD: 13.45%
• 6M: 22.53%
• 1Y: 41.86%
• 3Y*: 4.71%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

SPHD

• 1D: -0.89%
• 1M: -0.82%
• YTD: 4.38%
• 6M: 4.63%
• 1Y: 8.12%
• 3Y*: 11.42%
• 5Y*: 5.48%
• 10Y*: 7.08%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EVMT vs. SPHD - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
EVMT Invesco Electric Vehicle Metals Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF	13.45%	30.61%	-10.50%	-27.71%	-16.95%
SPHD Invesco S&P 500® High Dividend Low Volatility ETF	4.38%	3.41%	18.08%	1.32%	-5.08%

Correlation

The correlation between EVMT and SPHD is 0.14, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.14
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.15
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 27, 2022	0.18

Return for Risk

EVMT vs. SPHD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EVMT

EVMT Risk / Return Rank: 85
EVMT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 85
EVMT Sortino Ratio Rank: 84
EVMT Omega Ratio Rank: 84
EVMT Calmar Ratio Rank: 89
EVMT Martin Ratio Rank: 85

SPHD

SPHD Risk / Return Rank: 21
SPHD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 21
SPHD Sortino Ratio Rank: 21
SPHD Omega Ratio Rank: 19
SPHD Calmar Ratio Rank: 23
SPHD Martin Ratio Rank: 22

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EVMT vs. SPHD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Electric Vehicle Metals Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF (EVMT) and Invesco S&P 500® High Dividend Low Volatility ETF (SPHD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	EVMT	SPHD	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	2.79	0.74	+2.05
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	3.72	1.15	+2.57
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.51	1.13	+0.38
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	5.28	1.11	+4.17
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	17.86	2.78	+15.08
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

EVMT vs. SPHD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EVMT Sharpe Ratio is 2.79, which is higher than the SPHD Sharpe Ratio of 0.74. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EVMT and SPHD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	EVMT	SPHD	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.79	0.74	+2.05
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.39	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.40	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.26	0.58	-0.84

Drawdowns

EVMT vs. SPHD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EVMT drawdown since its inception was -48.34%, which is greater than SPHD's maximum drawdown of -41.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EVMT and SPHD.

Drawdown Indicators

	EVMT	SPHD	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-48.34%	-41.39%	-6.95%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-7.96%	-7.33%	-0.63%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-29.38%	-13.29%	-16.09%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-19.50%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-41.39%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-21.69%	-5.37%	-16.32%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-34.74%	-4.70%	-30.04%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.35%	2.93%	-0.58%

Volatility

EVMT vs. SPHD - Volatility Comparison

Invesco Electric Vehicle Metals Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF (EVMT) has a higher volatility of 4.51% compared to Invesco S&P 500® High Dividend Low Volatility ETF (SPHD) at 2.99%. This indicates that EVMT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SPHD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	EVMT	SPHD	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.51%	2.99%	+1.52%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	13.47%	7.55%	+5.92%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	15.09%	11.04%	+4.05%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	20.51%	14.16%	+6.35%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	20.51%	17.64%	+2.87%

EVMT vs. SPHD - Expense Ratio Comparison

EVMT has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is higher than SPHD's 0.30% expense ratio.

Dividends

EVMT vs. SPHD - Dividend Comparison

EVMT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.40%, more than SPHD's 4.62% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
EVMT Invesco Electric Vehicle Metals Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF	10.40%	11.80%	3.62%	5.49%	0.86%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
SPHD Invesco S&P 500® High Dividend Low Volatility ETF	4.62%	4.02%	3.41%	4.48%	3.89%	3.45%	4.89%	4.07%	4.40%	3.14%	3.83%	3.49%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both EVMT and SPHD in my portfolio?

EVMT and SPHD have a correlation of 0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, EVMT or SPHD?

EVMT has higher volatility (4.51%) compared to SPHD (2.99%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EVMT dropped -48.34% vs SPHD's -41.39%.

Which ETF is better, EVMT or SPHD?

On 3-year performance, SPHD leads with 11.42% vs 4.71% for EVMT. On fees, SPHD is cheaper at 0.30% per year. On volatility, SPHD has been the lower-risk option at 2.99%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, EVMT or SPHD?

Over the 3-year period, SPHD has performed better with a 11.42% return vs 4.71%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, EVMT or SPHD?

SPHD is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for EVMT.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, EVMT or SPHD?

EVMT has the higher dividend yield at 10.40%, compared with 4.62% for SPHD.

What is the main difference between EVMT and SPHD?

EVMT is categorized as Commodities, while SPHD is S&P 500. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for EVMT and 0.30% for SPHD.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

EVMT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.79 vs 0.74), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.