EVMT vs. COMT

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

EVMT (Invesco Electric Vehicle Metals Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF) and COMT (iShares Commodities Select Strategy ETF) are both Commodities funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past 3 years, EVMT returned 4.71%/yr vs 16.86%/yr for COMT. At a 0.28 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. EVMT charges 0.59%/yr vs 0.48%/yr for COMT.

Performance

EVMT vs. COMT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco Electric Vehicle Metals Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF (EVMT) and iShares Commodities Select Strategy ETF (COMT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EVMT achieves a 13.45% return, which is significantly lower than COMT's 39.67% return.

EVMT

• 1D: -1.66%
• 1M: 2.45%
• YTD: 13.45%
• 6M: 22.53%
• 1Y: 41.86%
• 3Y*: 4.71%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

COMT

• 1D: 0.78%
• 1M: -4.35%
• YTD: 39.67%
• 6M: 39.06%
• 1Y: 47.51%
• 3Y*: 16.86%
• 5Y*: 13.50%
• 10Y*: 9.09%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EVMT vs. COMT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
EVMT Invesco Electric Vehicle Metals Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF	13.45%	30.61%	-10.50%	-27.71%	-16.95%
COMT iShares Commodities Select Strategy ETF	39.67%	6.07%	5.96%	-6.56%	-10.77%

Correlation

The correlation between EVMT and COMT is 0.11, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.11
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.26
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 27, 2022	0.28

The correlation between EVMT and COMT shifts across timeframes, from 0.11 (1 year) to 0.28 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

EVMT vs. COMT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EVMT

EVMT Risk / Return Rank: 85
EVMT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 85
EVMT Sortino Ratio Rank: 84
EVMT Omega Ratio Rank: 84
EVMT Calmar Ratio Rank: 89
EVMT Martin Ratio Rank: 85

COMT

COMT Risk / Return Rank: 71
COMT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 66
COMT Sortino Ratio Rank: 60
COMT Omega Ratio Rank: 64
COMT Calmar Ratio Rank: 91
COMT Martin Ratio Rank: 73

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EVMT vs. COMT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Electric Vehicle Metals Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF (EVMT) and iShares Commodities Select Strategy ETF (COMT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	EVMT	COMT	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.79	2.24	+0.54
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.72	2.88	+0.84
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.51	1.40	+0.11
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	5.28	5.95	-0.67
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	17.86	14.11	+3.76
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

EVMT vs. COMT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EVMT Sharpe Ratio is 2.79, which is comparable to the COMT Sharpe Ratio of 2.24. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EVMT and COMT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	EVMT	COMT	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.79	2.24	+0.54
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.64	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.48	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.26	0.20	-0.47

Drawdowns

EVMT vs. COMT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EVMT drawdown since its inception was -48.34%, smaller than the maximum COMT drawdown of -51.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EVMT and COMT.

Drawdown Indicators

	EVMT	COMT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-48.34%	-51.89%	+3.55%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-7.96%	-8.02%	+0.06%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-29.38%	-13.31%	-16.07%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-29.00%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-39.22%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-21.69%	-4.82%	-16.87%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-34.74%	-24.07%	-10.67%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.35%	3.38%	-1.03%

Volatility

EVMT vs. COMT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco Electric Vehicle Metals Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF (EVMT) is 4.51%, while iShares Commodities Select Strategy ETF (COMT) has a volatility of 7.37%. This indicates that EVMT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than COMT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	EVMT	COMT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.51%	7.37%	-2.86%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	13.47%	18.80%	-5.33%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	15.09%	21.29%	-6.20%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	20.51%	21.06%	-0.55%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	20.51%	18.89%	+1.62%

EVMT vs. COMT - Expense Ratio Comparison

EVMT has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is higher than COMT's 0.48% expense ratio.

Dividends

EVMT vs. COMT - Dividend Comparison

EVMT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.40%, more than COMT's 5.54% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
COMT iShares Commodities Select Strategy ETF	5.54%	7.74%	4.90%	5.19%	29.79%	17.79%	0.36%	2.61%	11.65%	5.16%	0.52%	1.44%
EVMT Invesco Electric Vehicle Metals Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF	10.40%	11.80%	3.62%	5.49%	0.86%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both EVMT and COMT in my portfolio?

EVMT and COMT have a correlation of 0.11, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, EVMT or COMT?

COMT has higher volatility (7.37%) compared to EVMT (4.51%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EVMT dropped -48.34% vs COMT's -51.89%.

Which ETF is better, EVMT or COMT?

On 3-year performance, COMT leads with 16.86% vs 4.71% for EVMT. On fees, COMT is cheaper at 0.48% per year. On volatility, EVMT has been the lower-risk option at 4.51%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, EVMT or COMT?

Over the 3-year period, COMT has performed better with a 16.86% return vs 4.71%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, EVMT or COMT?

COMT is cheaper with a 0.48% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for EVMT.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, EVMT or COMT?

EVMT has the higher dividend yield at 10.40%, compared with 5.54% for COMT.

What is the main difference between EVMT and COMT?

They also come from different issuers: Invesco and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for EVMT and 0.48% for COMT.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

EVMT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.79 vs 2.24), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.