EVLU vs. IEMG
EVLU (iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Value Factor ETF) and IEMG (iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - EVLU is a Emerging Markets Equities fund tracking the MSCI Emerging Markets Value Factor Select Index (Net), while IEMG is a Emerging Markets Diversified fund tracking the MSCI Emerging Markets Investable Market Index (USD) (Net). Both are passively managed. Over the past year, EVLU returned 66.19% vs 53.20% for IEMG. Their correlation of 0.93 suggests significant overlap in exposure. EVLU charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.09%/yr for IEMG.
Performance
EVLU vs. IEMG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EVLU achieves a 33.06% return, which is significantly higher than IEMG's 28.97% return.
EVLU
- 1D
- -0.12%
- 1M
- 6.37%
- YTD
- 33.06%
- 6M
- 34.87%
- 1Y
- 66.19%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
IEMG
- 1D
- 0.43%
- 1M
- 7.60%
- YTD
- 28.97%
- 6M
- 30.48%
- 1Y
- 53.20%
- 3Y*
- 24.44%
- 5Y*
- 8.45%
- 10Y*
- 11.00%
EVLU vs. IEMG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
EVLU iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Value Factor ETF | 33.06% | 38.54% | 1.21% |
IEMG iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets ETF | 28.97% | 32.56% | -0.26% |
Correlation
The correlation between EVLU and IEMG is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.92 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 6, 2024 | 0.93 |
The correlation between EVLU and IEMG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.92 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EVLU vs. IEMG — Risk / Return Rank
EVLU
IEMG
EVLU vs. IEMG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Value Factor ETF (EVLU) and iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets ETF (IEMG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| EVLU | IEMG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.84 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.97 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.59 | 1.47 | +0.12 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.16 | 4.05 | +1.11 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 18.17 | 14.87 | +3.30 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
EVLU vs. IEMG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EVLU drawdown since its inception was -17.17%, smaller than the maximum IEMG drawdown of -38.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EVLU and IEMG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EVLU | IEMG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -17.17% | -38.71% | +21.54% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.90% | -13.21% | +0.31% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -17.21% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -35.75% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -38.71% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.96% | 0.00% | -2.96% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.52% | -12.94% | +9.42% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.65% | 3.59% | +0.06% |
Volatility
EVLU vs. IEMG - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Value Factor ETF (EVLU) is 8.82%, while iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets ETF (IEMG) has a volatility of 10.67%. This indicates that EVLU experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IEMG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EVLU | IEMG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.82% | 10.67% | -1.85% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 17.33% | 19.30% | -1.97% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.95% | 21.44% | -1.49% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.24% | 18.84% | +1.40% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.24% | 20.21% | +0.03% |
EVLU vs. IEMG - Expense Ratio Comparison
EVLU has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than IEMG's 0.09% expense ratio.
Dividends
EVLU vs. IEMG - Dividend Comparison
EVLU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.66%, more than IEMG's 2.09% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EVLU iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Value Factor ETF | 3.66% | 5.20% | 1.03% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
IEMG iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets ETF | 2.09% | 2.75% | 3.20% | 2.89% | 2.71% | 3.06% | 1.87% | 3.15% | 2.76% | 2.35% | 2.28% | 2.53% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.92, EVLU and IEMG move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
IEMG has higher volatility (10.67%) compared to EVLU (8.82%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EVLU dropped -17.17% vs IEMG's -38.71%.
On 1-year performance, EVLU leads with 66.19% vs 53.20% for IEMG. On fees, IEMG is cheaper at 0.09% per year. On volatility, EVLU has been the lower-risk option at 8.82%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, EVLU has performed better with a 66.19% return vs 53.20%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IEMG is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for EVLU.
EVLU has the higher dividend yield at 3.66%, compared with 2.09% for IEMG.
EVLU is categorized as Emerging Markets Equities, while IEMG is Emerging Markets Diversified. EVLU tracks MSCI Emerging Markets Value Factor Select Index (Net), while IEMG tracks MSCI Emerging Markets Investable Market Index (USD) (Net). Their fees differ too: 0.35% for EVLU and 0.09% for IEMG.
EVLU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.34 vs 2.50), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for EVLU and IEMG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer