PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EVLU vs. EJAN
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EVLU vs. EJAN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Value Factor ETF (EVLU) and Innovator Emerging Markets Power Buffer ETF January (EJAN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EVLU achieves a 26.39% return, which is significantly higher than EJAN's 6.14% return.


EVLU

1D
0.12%
1M
0.50%
6M
16.81%
YTD
26.39%
1Y
52.71%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
35.20%

EJAN

1D
0.42%
1M
0.75%
6M
3.18%
YTD
6.14%
1Y
11.50%
3Y*
6.90%
5Y*
3.53%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
4.32%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$267.44K$193.23K$472.80K
$154.42K$144.62K$121.49K

EVLU vs. EJAN - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between EVLU and EJAN is 0.78, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.78

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 6, 2024

0.82

The correlation between EVLU and EJAN has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.78 to 0.82 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EVLU vs. EJAN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

EVLU
EVLU Risk / Return Rank: 9090
Overall Rank
EVLU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EVLU Sortino Ratio Rank: 9090
Sortino Ratio Rank
EVLU Omega Ratio Rank: 9191
Omega Ratio Rank
EVLU Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
EVLU Martin Ratio Rank: 8484
Martin Ratio Rank

EJAN
EJAN Risk / Return Rank: 5656
Overall Rank
EJAN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5353
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EJAN Sortino Ratio Rank: 5353
Sortino Ratio Rank
EJAN Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
EJAN Calmar Ratio Rank: 4747
Calmar Ratio Rank
EJAN Martin Ratio Rank: 6161
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

EVLU vs. EJAN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Value Factor ETF (EVLU) and Innovator Emerging Markets Power Buffer ETF January (EJAN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


EVLUEJANDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.18

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.31

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.43

1.29

+0.15

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.01

1.69

+2.31

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.62

7.40

+4.22

EVLU vs. EJAN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EVLU Sharpe Ratio is 2.47, which is higher than the EJAN Sharpe Ratio of 1.30. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EVLU and EJAN, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

EVLU vs. EJAN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EVLU drawdown since its inception was -17.17%, smaller than the maximum EJAN drawdown of -22.23%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EVLU and EJAN.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EVLUEJANDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-17.17%

-22.23%

+5.06%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.90%

-6.63%

-6.27%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-11.75%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.84%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.82%

-0.80%

-7.02%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.75%

-5.67%

+1.92%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.44%

1.51%

+2.93%

Volatility

EVLU vs. EJAN - Volatility Comparison

iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Value Factor ETF (EVLU) has a higher volatility of 6.36% compared to Innovator Emerging Markets Power Buffer ETF January (EJAN) at 2.75%. This indicates that EVLU's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EJAN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EVLUEJANDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.36%

2.75%

+3.61%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

18.46%

8.21%

+10.25%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

20.91%

8.64%

+12.27%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.37%

11.15%

+9.22%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.37%

12.63%

+7.74%

EVLU vs. EJAN - Expense Ratio Comparison

EVLU has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than EJAN's 0.89% expense ratio.


Dividends

EVLU vs. EJAN - Dividend Comparison

EVLU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.85%, while EJAN has not paid dividends to shareholders.


Frequently Asked Questions


EVLU and EJAN have a correlation of 0.78, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

EVLU has higher volatility (6.36%) compared to EJAN (2.75%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EVLU dropped -17.17% vs EJAN's -22.23%.

On 1-year performance, EVLU leads with 52.71% vs 11.50% for EJAN. On fees, EVLU is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, EJAN has been the lower-risk option at 2.75%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, EVLU has performed better with a 52.71% return vs 11.50%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

EVLU is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.89% for EJAN.

EVLU has the higher dividend yield at 3.85%, compared with 0.00% for EJAN.

EVLU is categorized as Emerging Markets Equities, while EJAN is Defined Outcome. EVLU tracks MSCI Emerging Markets Value Factor Select Index (Net), while EJAN tracks MSCI Emerging Markets Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Innovator. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for EVLU and 0.89% for EJAN.

EVLU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.47 vs 1.30), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EVLU and EJAN

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer