PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EVLN vs. JPLD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EVLN vs. JPLD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Eaton Vance Floating-Rate ETF (EVLN) and J P Morgan Exchange-Traded Fund Trust - Limited Duration Bond ETF (JPLD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EVLN achieves a 1.37% return, which is significantly higher than JPLD's 1.04% return.


EVLN

1D
-0.04%
1M
0.66%
YTD
1.37%
6M
1.73%
1Y
4.86%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

JPLD

1D
-0.06%
1M
0.19%
YTD
1.04%
6M
1.37%
1Y
4.71%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EVLN vs. JPLD - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between EVLN and JPLD is -0.06, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.06

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 9, 2024

-0.02

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EVLN vs. JPLD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EVLN
EVLN Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
EVLN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EVLN Sortino Ratio Rank: 9191
Sortino Ratio Rank
EVLN Omega Ratio Rank: 8888
Omega Ratio Rank
EVLN Calmar Ratio Rank: 5656
Calmar Ratio Rank
EVLN Martin Ratio Rank: 5353
Martin Ratio Rank

JPLD
JPLD Risk / Return Rank: 9191
Overall Rank
JPLD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JPLD Sortino Ratio Rank: 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
JPLD Omega Ratio Rank: 9494
Omega Ratio Rank
JPLD Calmar Ratio Rank: 8585
Calmar Ratio Rank
JPLD Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EVLN vs. JPLD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Eaton Vance Floating-Rate ETF (EVLN) and J P Morgan Exchange-Traded Fund Trust - Limited Duration Bond ETF (JPLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


EVLNJPLDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.61

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.90

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.55

1.68

-0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.76

4.71

-1.95

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.01

21.78

-12.77

EVLN vs. JPLD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EVLN Sharpe Ratio is 2.61, which is comparable to the JPLD Sharpe Ratio of 3.22. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EVLN and JPLD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


EVLNJPLDDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.61

3.22

-0.61

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

2.55

3.25

-0.70

Drawdowns

EVLN vs. JPLD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EVLN drawdown since its inception was -2.78%, which is greater than JPLD's maximum drawdown of -1.17%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EVLN and JPLD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EVLNJPLDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-2.78%

-1.17%

-1.61%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.77%

-1.00%

-0.77%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.04%

-0.12%

+0.08%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.22%

-0.15%

-0.07%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.54%

0.22%

+0.32%

Volatility

EVLN vs. JPLD - Volatility Comparison

Eaton Vance Floating-Rate ETF (EVLN) has a higher volatility of 0.46% compared to J P Morgan Exchange-Traded Fund Trust - Limited Duration Bond ETF (JPLD) at 0.37%. This indicates that EVLN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than JPLD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EVLNJPLDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.46%

0.37%

+0.09%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.62%

0.97%

+0.65%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.89%

1.47%

+0.42%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

2.43%

1.83%

+0.60%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

2.43%

1.83%

+0.60%

EVLN vs. JPLD - Expense Ratio Comparison

EVLN has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than JPLD's 0.24% expense ratio.


Dividends

EVLN vs. JPLD - Dividend Comparison

EVLN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.92%, more than JPLD's 4.21% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023
EVLN
Eaton Vance Floating-Rate ETF
6.92%7.28%6.41%0.00%
JPLD
J P Morgan Exchange-Traded Fund Trust - Limited Duration Bond ETF
4.21%4.24%4.47%1.83%

Frequently Asked Questions


EVLN and JPLD have a correlation of -0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

EVLN has higher volatility (0.46%) compared to JPLD (0.37%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EVLN dropped -2.78% vs JPLD's -1.17%.

On 1-year performance, EVLN leads with 4.86% vs 4.71% for JPLD. On fees, JPLD is cheaper at 0.24% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, EVLN has performed better with a 4.86% return vs 4.71%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

JPLD is cheaper with a 0.24% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for EVLN.

EVLN has the higher dividend yield at 6.92%, compared with 4.21% for JPLD.

EVLN is categorized as Bank Loan, while JPLD is Short-Term Bond. They also come from different issuers: Eaton Vance and JPMorgan. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for EVLN and 0.24% for JPLD.

JPLD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.22 vs 2.61), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EVLN and JPLD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer