PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EVAV vs. BSSX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EVAV vs. BSSX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Direxion Daily Electric and Autonomous Vehicles Bull 2X Shares (EVAV) and Invesco BulletShares 2033 Municipal Bond ETF (BSSX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


EVAV

1D
1M
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

BSSX

1D
-0.25%
1M
0.47%
YTD
0.90%
6M
1.50%
1Y
6.99%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EVAV vs. BSSX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
EVAV
Direxion Daily Electric and Autonomous Vehicles Bull 2X Shares
0.00%33.87%-50.31%-23.79%
BSSX
Invesco BulletShares 2033 Municipal Bond ETF
0.90%3.79%-0.09%7.50%

Correlation

The correlation between EVAV and BSSX is -0.13, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.13

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 21, 2023

0.05

The correlation between EVAV and BSSX shifts across timeframes, from -0.13 (1 year) to 0.05 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

EVAV vs. BSSX - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
EVAV
BSSX

Consumer Cyclical

22.3%

-

Technology

2.7%

-

Industrials

2.6%

-

Basic Materials

-

-

Communication Services

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

-

Financial Services

-

3.1%

Healthcare

-

-

Real Estate

-

-

Utilities

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

EVAV
22.3%
BSSX

-

Technology

EVAV
2.7%
BSSX

-

Industrials

EVAV
2.6%
BSSX

-

Basic Materials

EVAV

-

BSSX

-

Communication Services

EVAV

-

BSSX

-

Consumer Defensive

EVAV

-

BSSX

-

Energy

EVAV

-

BSSX

-

Financial Services

EVAV

-

BSSX
3.1%

Healthcare

EVAV

-

BSSX

-

Real Estate

EVAV

-

BSSX

-

Utilities

EVAV

-

BSSX

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EVAV vs. BSSX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EVAV

BSSX
BSSX Risk / Return Rank: 5959
Overall Rank
BSSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6464
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BSSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
BSSX Omega Ratio Rank: 7474
Omega Ratio Rank
BSSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4444
Calmar Ratio Rank
BSSX Martin Ratio Rank: 4242
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EVAV vs. BSSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily Electric and Autonomous Vehicles Bull 2X Shares (EVAV) and Invesco BulletShares 2033 Municipal Bond ETF (BSSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

EVAV vs. BSSX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


EVAVBSSXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.09

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.57

Drawdowns

EVAV vs. BSSX - Drawdown Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EVAVBSSXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-8.12%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.28%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.12%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.26%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.05%

Volatility

EVAV vs. BSSX - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EVAVBSSXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.16%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.38%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.36%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

7.83%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

7.83%

EVAV vs. BSSX - Expense Ratio Comparison

EVAV has a 0.98% expense ratio, which is higher than BSSX's 0.18% expense ratio.


Dividends

EVAV vs. BSSX - Dividend Comparison

EVAV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.81%, less than BSSX's 3.31% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022
BSSX
Invesco BulletShares 2033 Municipal Bond ETF
3.31%3.27%3.29%0.95%0.00%
EVAV
Direxion Daily Electric and Autonomous Vehicles Bull 2X Shares
0.81%0.97%2.52%2.34%0.51%

Frequently Asked Questions


EVAV and BSSX have a correlation of -0.13, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, BSSX is cheaper at 0.18% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

BSSX is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.98% for EVAV.

BSSX has the higher dividend yield at 3.31%, compared with 0.81% for EVAV.

EVAV is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while BSSX is Municipal Bonds. EVAV tracks Indxx US Electric and Autonomous Vehicles Index - Benchmark TR Gross (200%), while BSSX tracks Invesco BulletShares USD Municipal Bond 2033 Index. They also come from different issuers: Direxion and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.98% for EVAV and 0.18% for BSSX.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EVAV and BSSX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer