PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EVAL.L vs. UD03.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EVAL.L vs. UD03.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in SPDR MSCI Europe Value UCITS ETF (EVAL.L) and UBS ETF (LU) Factor MSCI EMU Prime Value UCITS ETF (EUR) A-dis (UD03.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

EVAL.L is traded in GBP, while UD03.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the UD03.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EVAL.L achieves a 11.21% return, which is significantly lower than UD03.L's 12.28% return.


EVAL.L

1D
0.67%
1M
4.21%
YTD
11.21%
6M
14.15%
1Y
34.42%
3Y*
20.71%
5Y*
14.15%
10Y*
11.80%

UD03.L

1D
0.26%
1M
4.71%
YTD
12.28%
6M
15.08%
1Y
24.17%
3Y*
14.83%
5Y*
10.72%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EVAL.L vs. UD03.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
EVAL.L
SPDR MSCI Europe Value UCITS ETF
11.21%41.81%4.36%11.02%1.33%19.13%-2.54%0.55%
UD03.L
UBS ETF (LU) Factor MSCI EMU Prime Value UCITS ETF (EUR) A-dis
12.28%25.20%0.78%19.24%-4.62%10.81%5.72%0.00%

Correlation

The correlation between EVAL.L and UD03.L is 0.57, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.57

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.37

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.32

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 17, 2019

0.27

Over the past year, EVAL.L and UD03.L have become more correlated (0.57) than their long-term average of 0.27, meaning their price movements have been converging.

EVAL.L vs. UD03.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
EVAL.L
UD03.L

Financial Services

21.5%
28.5%

Industrials

18.0%
12.1%

Healthcare

13.2%
4.1%

Technology

10.6%
16.2%

Consumer Defensive

8.6%
14.6%

Consumer Cyclical

6.6%
7.0%

Basic Materials

6.2%
4.2%

Energy

5.5%
2.7%

Utilities

5.3%
7.7%

Communication Services

4.0%
3.1%

Real Estate

0.7%

-

Financial Services

EVAL.L
21.5%
UD03.L
28.5%

Industrials

EVAL.L
18.0%
UD03.L
12.1%

Healthcare

EVAL.L
13.2%
UD03.L
4.1%

Technology

EVAL.L
10.6%
UD03.L
16.2%

Consumer Defensive

EVAL.L
8.6%
UD03.L
14.6%

Consumer Cyclical

EVAL.L
6.6%
UD03.L
7.0%

Basic Materials

EVAL.L
6.2%
UD03.L
4.2%

Energy

EVAL.L
5.5%
UD03.L
2.7%

Utilities

EVAL.L
5.3%
UD03.L
7.7%

Communication Services

EVAL.L
4.0%
UD03.L
3.1%

Real Estate

EVAL.L
0.7%
UD03.L

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EVAL.L vs. UD03.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EVAL.L
EVAL.L Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
EVAL.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8282
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EVAL.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8080
Sortino Ratio Rank
EVAL.L Omega Ratio Rank: 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
EVAL.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
EVAL.L Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank

UD03.L
UD03.L Risk / Return Rank: 9090
Overall Rank
UD03.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UD03.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
UD03.L Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
UD03.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
UD03.L Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EVAL.L vs. UD03.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR MSCI Europe Value UCITS ETF (EVAL.L) and UBS ETF (LU) Factor MSCI EMU Prime Value UCITS ETF (EUR) A-dis (UD03.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


EVAL.LUD03.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.85

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.94

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.47

1.61

-0.14

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.39

5.70

-2.31

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.59

16.25

-3.65

EVAL.L vs. UD03.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EVAL.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.63, which is comparable to the UD03.L Sharpe Ratio of 3.47. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EVAL.L and UD03.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


EVAL.LUD03.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.63

3.47

-0.85

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.98

1.75

-0.77

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.69

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.37

1.19

-0.82

Drawdowns

EVAL.L vs. UD03.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EVAL.L drawdown since its inception was -40.72%, which is greater than UD03.L's maximum drawdown of -30.85%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EVAL.L and UD03.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EVAL.LUD03.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-40.72%

-30.85%

-9.87%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.10%

-9.80%

-0.30%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.35%

-11.72%

-2.63%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-14.61%

-18.67%

+4.06%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-37.77%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.61%

-1.19%

-0.42%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.10%

-3.31%

-7.79%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.73%

3.56%

-0.83%

Volatility

EVAL.L vs. UD03.L - Volatility Comparison

SPDR MSCI Europe Value UCITS ETF (EVAL.L) has a higher volatility of 4.12% compared to UBS ETF (LU) Factor MSCI EMU Prime Value UCITS ETF (EUR) A-dis (UD03.L) at 3.58%. This indicates that EVAL.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than UD03.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EVAL.LUD03.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.12%

3.58%

+0.54%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.49%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.05%

16.13%

-3.08%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.45%

27.46%

-13.01%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.97%

47.29%

-30.32%

EVAL.L vs. UD03.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

EVAL.L has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than UD03.L's 0.28% expense ratio.


Dividends

EVAL.L vs. UD03.L - Dividend Comparison

EVAL.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while UD03.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.54%.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020
EVAL.L
SPDR MSCI Europe Value UCITS ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
UD03.L
UBS ETF (LU) Factor MSCI EMU Prime Value UCITS ETF (EUR) A-dis
2.54%2.97%2.84%3.67%3.96%3.50%2.07%

Frequently Asked Questions


EVAL.L and UD03.L have a correlation of 0.57, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, EVAL.L is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

EVAL.L is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.28% for UD03.L.

EVAL.L tracks MSCI Europe Value NR EUR, while UD03.L tracks MSCI EMU NR EUR. They also come from different issuers: State Street and UBS. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for EVAL.L and 0.28% for UD03.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EVAL.L and UD03.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer