PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EVAL.L vs. SPOL.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EVAL.L vs. SPOL.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in SPDR MSCI Europe Value UCITS ETF (EVAL.L) and iShares MSCI Poland UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (SPOL.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

EVAL.L is traded in GBP, while SPOL.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the SPOL.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EVAL.L achieves a 11.21% return, which is significantly lower than SPOL.L's 15.71% return. Over the past 10 years, EVAL.L has outperformed SPOL.L with an annualized return of 11.80%, while SPOL.L has yielded a comparatively lower 10.28% annualized return.


EVAL.L

1D
0.67%
1M
4.21%
YTD
11.21%
6M
14.15%
1Y
34.42%
3Y*
20.71%
5Y*
14.15%
10Y*
11.80%

SPOL.L

1D
0.64%
1M
6.57%
YTD
15.71%
6M
25.23%
1Y
43.43%
3Y*
30.33%
5Y*
15.01%
10Y*
10.28%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EVAL.L vs. SPOL.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
EVAL.L
SPDR MSCI Europe Value UCITS ETF
11.21%41.81%4.36%11.02%1.33%19.13%-2.54%16.22%-13.77%15.54%
SPOL.L
iShares MSCI Poland UCITS ETF USD (Acc)
15.71%61.27%-4.98%41.52%-17.96%8.30%-14.19%-9.68%-7.69%40.45%

Correlation

The correlation between EVAL.L and SPOL.L is 0.55, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.55

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.53

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.57

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.55

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 19, 2015

0.55

The correlation between EVAL.L and SPOL.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.53 to 0.57 - a consistent structural relationship.

EVAL.L vs. SPOL.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
EVAL.L
SPOL.L

Financial Services

21.5%
48.0%

Industrials

18.0%
1.9%

Healthcare

13.2%

-

Technology

10.6%
2.2%

Consumer Defensive

8.6%
5.4%

Consumer Cyclical

6.6%
10.9%

Basic Materials

6.2%
9.8%

Energy

5.5%
16.7%

Utilities

5.3%
2.0%

Communication Services

4.0%
3.2%

Real Estate

0.7%

-

Financial Services

EVAL.L
21.5%
SPOL.L
48.0%

Industrials

EVAL.L
18.0%
SPOL.L
1.9%

Healthcare

EVAL.L
13.2%
SPOL.L

-

Technology

EVAL.L
10.6%
SPOL.L
2.2%

Consumer Defensive

EVAL.L
8.6%
SPOL.L
5.4%

Consumer Cyclical

EVAL.L
6.6%
SPOL.L
10.9%

Basic Materials

EVAL.L
6.2%
SPOL.L
9.8%

Energy

EVAL.L
5.5%
SPOL.L
16.7%

Utilities

EVAL.L
5.3%
SPOL.L
2.0%

Communication Services

EVAL.L
4.0%
SPOL.L
3.2%

Real Estate

EVAL.L
0.7%
SPOL.L

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EVAL.L vs. SPOL.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EVAL.L
EVAL.L Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
EVAL.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8282
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EVAL.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8080
Sortino Ratio Rank
EVAL.L Omega Ratio Rank: 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
EVAL.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
EVAL.L Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank

SPOL.L
SPOL.L Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
SPOL.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5656
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPOL.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 5454
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPOL.L Omega Ratio Rank: 5050
Omega Ratio Rank
SPOL.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 8484
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPOL.L Martin Ratio Rank: 6262
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EVAL.L vs. SPOL.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR MSCI Europe Value UCITS ETF (EVAL.L) and iShares MSCI Poland UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (SPOL.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


EVAL.LSPOL.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.76

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.94

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.47

1.31

+0.17

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.39

4.54

-1.15

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.59

10.87

+1.73

EVAL.L vs. SPOL.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EVAL.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.63, which is higher than the SPOL.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.87. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EVAL.L and SPOL.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


EVAL.LSPOL.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.63

1.87

+0.76

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.98

0.55

+0.43

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.69

0.40

+0.29

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.37

0.16

+0.21

Drawdowns

EVAL.L vs. SPOL.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EVAL.L drawdown since its inception was -40.72%, smaller than the maximum SPOL.L drawdown of -56.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EVAL.L and SPOL.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EVAL.LSPOL.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-40.72%

-56.64%

+15.92%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.10%

-9.51%

-0.59%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.35%

-19.47%

+5.12%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-14.61%

-46.27%

+31.66%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-37.77%

-56.64%

+18.87%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.61%

-0.53%

-1.08%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.10%

-21.79%

+10.69%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.73%

3.98%

-1.25%

Volatility

EVAL.L vs. SPOL.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for SPDR MSCI Europe Value UCITS ETF (EVAL.L) is 4.12%, while iShares MSCI Poland UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (SPOL.L) has a volatility of 7.21%. This indicates that EVAL.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SPOL.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EVAL.LSPOL.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.12%

7.21%

-3.09%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.49%

17.30%

-6.81%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.05%

23.13%

-10.08%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.45%

27.10%

-12.65%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.97%

25.42%

-8.45%

EVAL.L vs. SPOL.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

EVAL.L has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than SPOL.L's 0.74% expense ratio.


Dividends

EVAL.L vs. SPOL.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither EVAL.L nor SPOL.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


EVAL.L and SPOL.L have a correlation of 0.55, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, EVAL.L is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

EVAL.L is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.74% for SPOL.L.

EVAL.L tracks MSCI Europe Value NR EUR, while SPOL.L tracks MSCI Poland NR EUR. They also come from different issuers: State Street and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for EVAL.L and 0.74% for SPOL.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EVAL.L and SPOL.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer