PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EVAL.L vs. MIVO.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EVAL.L vs. MIVO.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in SPDR MSCI Europe Value UCITS ETF (EVAL.L) and Amundi MSCI Europe Minimum Volatility UCITS (MIVO.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

EVAL.L is traded in GBP, while MIVO.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the MIVO.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EVAL.L achieves a 11.21% return, which is significantly higher than MIVO.L's 4.24% return. Over the past 10 years, EVAL.L has outperformed MIVO.L with an annualized return of 11.80%, while MIVO.L has yielded a comparatively lower 7.53% annualized return.


EVAL.L

1D
0.67%
1M
4.21%
YTD
11.21%
6M
14.15%
1Y
34.42%
3Y*
20.71%
5Y*
14.15%
10Y*
11.80%

MIVO.L

1D
0.44%
1M
0.62%
YTD
4.24%
6M
5.52%
1Y
7.85%
3Y*
10.28%
5Y*
7.34%
10Y*
7.53%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EVAL.L vs. MIVO.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
EVAL.L
SPDR MSCI Europe Value UCITS ETF
11.21%41.81%4.36%11.02%1.33%19.13%-2.54%16.22%-13.77%15.54%
MIVO.L
Amundi MSCI Europe Minimum Volatility UCITS
4.24%17.54%6.50%8.50%-7.95%13.43%1.38%16.36%-3.04%13.15%

Correlation

The correlation between EVAL.L and MIVO.L is 0.63, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.63

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.66

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.69

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.69

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 19, 2015

0.71

The correlation between EVAL.L and MIVO.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.63 to 0.71 - a consistent structural relationship.

EVAL.L vs. MIVO.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
EVAL.L
MIVO.L

Financial Services

21.5%
17.5%

Industrials

18.0%
15.5%

Healthcare

13.2%
13.1%

Technology

10.6%
2.5%

Consumer Defensive

8.6%
13.3%

Consumer Cyclical

6.6%
3.3%

Basic Materials

6.2%
3.6%

Energy

5.5%
9.9%

Utilities

5.3%
10.5%

Communication Services

4.0%
9.5%

Real Estate

0.7%
1.5%

Financial Services

EVAL.L
21.5%
MIVO.L
17.5%

Industrials

EVAL.L
18.0%
MIVO.L
15.5%

Healthcare

EVAL.L
13.2%
MIVO.L
13.1%

Technology

EVAL.L
10.6%
MIVO.L
2.5%

Consumer Defensive

EVAL.L
8.6%
MIVO.L
13.3%

Consumer Cyclical

EVAL.L
6.6%
MIVO.L
3.3%

Basic Materials

EVAL.L
6.2%
MIVO.L
3.6%

Energy

EVAL.L
5.5%
MIVO.L
9.9%

Utilities

EVAL.L
5.3%
MIVO.L
10.5%

Communication Services

EVAL.L
4.0%
MIVO.L
9.5%

Real Estate

EVAL.L
0.7%
MIVO.L
1.5%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EVAL.L vs. MIVO.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EVAL.L
EVAL.L Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
EVAL.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8282
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EVAL.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8080
Sortino Ratio Rank
EVAL.L Omega Ratio Rank: 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
EVAL.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
EVAL.L Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank

MIVO.L
MIVO.L Risk / Return Rank: 2323
Overall Rank
MIVO.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2525
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MIVO.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 2323
Sortino Ratio Rank
MIVO.L Omega Ratio Rank: 2525
Omega Ratio Rank
MIVO.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 2121
Calmar Ratio Rank
MIVO.L Martin Ratio Rank: 2222
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EVAL.L vs. MIVO.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR MSCI Europe Value UCITS ETF (EVAL.L) and Amundi MSCI Europe Minimum Volatility UCITS (MIVO.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


EVAL.LMIVO.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.75

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.30

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.47

1.16

+0.31

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.39

0.93

+2.46

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.59

2.76

+9.84

EVAL.L vs. MIVO.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EVAL.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.63, which is higher than the MIVO.L Sharpe Ratio of 0.88. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EVAL.L and MIVO.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


EVAL.LMIVO.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.63

0.88

+1.75

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.98

0.67

+0.31

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.69

0.62

+0.08

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.37

0.74

-0.37

Drawdowns

EVAL.L vs. MIVO.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EVAL.L drawdown since its inception was -40.72%, which is greater than MIVO.L's maximum drawdown of -24.30%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EVAL.L and MIVO.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EVAL.LMIVO.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-40.72%

-24.30%

-16.42%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.10%

-8.38%

-1.72%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.35%

-8.38%

-5.97%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-14.61%

-17.54%

+2.93%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-37.77%

-24.30%

-13.47%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.61%

-4.95%

+3.34%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.10%

-3.61%

-7.49%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.73%

2.84%

-0.11%

Volatility

EVAL.L vs. MIVO.L - Volatility Comparison

SPDR MSCI Europe Value UCITS ETF (EVAL.L) has a higher volatility of 4.12% compared to Amundi MSCI Europe Minimum Volatility UCITS (MIVO.L) at 2.77%. This indicates that EVAL.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MIVO.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EVAL.LMIVO.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.12%

2.77%

+1.35%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.49%

7.44%

+3.05%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.05%

8.91%

+4.14%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.45%

10.94%

+3.51%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.97%

12.25%

+4.72%

EVAL.L vs. MIVO.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

EVAL.L has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than MIVO.L's 0.13% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

EVAL.L vs. MIVO.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither EVAL.L nor MIVO.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


EVAL.L and MIVO.L have a correlation of 0.63, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, MIVO.L is cheaper at 0.13% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

MIVO.L is cheaper with a 0.13% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for EVAL.L.

EVAL.L tracks MSCI Europe Value NR EUR, while MIVO.L tracks MSCI Europe NR EUR. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Amundi. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for EVAL.L and 0.13% for MIVO.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EVAL.L and MIVO.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer