PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EVAL.L vs. IEVL.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EVAL.L vs. IEVL.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in SPDR MSCI Europe Value UCITS ETF (EVAL.L) and iShares Edge MSCI Europe Value Factor UCITS ETF EUR Accumulating (IEVL.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

EVAL.L is traded in GBP, while IEVL.L is traded in EUR. To make them comparable, the IEVL.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EVAL.L achieves a 11.21% return, which is significantly lower than IEVL.L's 13.11% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with EVAL.L having a 11.80% annualized return and IEVL.L not far behind at 11.78%.


EVAL.L

1D
0.67%
1M
4.21%
YTD
11.21%
6M
14.15%
1Y
34.42%
3Y*
20.71%
5Y*
14.15%
10Y*
11.80%

IEVL.L

1D
0.17%
1M
4.83%
YTD
13.11%
6M
15.93%
1Y
36.39%
3Y*
21.80%
5Y*
14.64%
10Y*
11.78%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EVAL.L vs. IEVL.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
EVAL.L
SPDR MSCI Europe Value UCITS ETF
11.21%41.81%4.36%11.02%1.33%19.13%-2.54%16.22%-13.77%15.54%
IEVL.L
iShares Edge MSCI Europe Value Factor UCITS ETF EUR Accumulating
13.11%42.23%5.56%11.28%1.19%19.17%-3.59%14.85%-12.63%15.13%

Correlation

The correlation between EVAL.L and IEVL.L is 0.93, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.93

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.91

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.92

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.88

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 19, 2015

0.89

The correlation between EVAL.L and IEVL.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.88 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.

EVAL.L vs. IEVL.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
EVAL.L
IEVL.L

Financial Services

21.5%
22.6%

Industrials

18.0%
17.0%

Healthcare

13.2%
12.3%

Technology

10.6%
12.2%

Consumer Defensive

8.6%
8.6%

Consumer Cyclical

6.6%
6.2%

Basic Materials

6.2%
6.2%

Energy

5.5%
5.1%

Utilities

5.3%
4.5%

Communication Services

4.0%
3.7%

Real Estate

0.7%
0.6%

Financial Services

EVAL.L
21.5%
IEVL.L
22.6%

Industrials

EVAL.L
18.0%
IEVL.L
17.0%

Healthcare

EVAL.L
13.2%
IEVL.L
12.3%

Technology

EVAL.L
10.6%
IEVL.L
12.2%

Consumer Defensive

EVAL.L
8.6%
IEVL.L
8.6%

Consumer Cyclical

EVAL.L
6.6%
IEVL.L
6.2%

Basic Materials

EVAL.L
6.2%
IEVL.L
6.2%

Energy

EVAL.L
5.5%
IEVL.L
5.1%

Utilities

EVAL.L
5.3%
IEVL.L
4.5%

Communication Services

EVAL.L
4.0%
IEVL.L
3.7%

Real Estate

EVAL.L
0.7%
IEVL.L
0.6%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EVAL.L vs. IEVL.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EVAL.L
EVAL.L Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
EVAL.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8282
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EVAL.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8080
Sortino Ratio Rank
EVAL.L Omega Ratio Rank: 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
EVAL.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
EVAL.L Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank

IEVL.L
IEVL.L Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
IEVL.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IEVL.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7373
Sortino Ratio Rank
IEVL.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
IEVL.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
IEVL.L Martin Ratio Rank: 6868
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EVAL.L vs. IEVL.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR MSCI Europe Value UCITS ETF (EVAL.L) and iShares Edge MSCI Europe Value Factor UCITS ETF EUR Accumulating (IEVL.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


EVAL.LIEVL.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.05

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.09

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.47

1.48

-0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.39

3.42

-0.03

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.59

12.70

-0.11

EVAL.L vs. IEVL.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EVAL.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.63, which is comparable to the IEVL.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.68. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EVAL.L and IEVL.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


EVAL.LIEVL.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.63

2.68

-0.05

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.98

0.96

+0.02

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.69

0.69

+0.01

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.37

0.58

-0.21

Drawdowns

EVAL.L vs. IEVL.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EVAL.L drawdown since its inception was -40.72%, which is greater than IEVL.L's maximum drawdown of -34.82%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EVAL.L and IEVL.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EVAL.LIEVL.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-40.72%

-34.82%

-5.90%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.10%

-10.59%

+0.49%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.35%

-16.33%

+1.98%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-14.61%

-16.48%

+1.87%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-37.77%

-34.82%

-2.95%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.61%

-0.82%

-0.79%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.10%

-6.05%

-5.05%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.73%

2.86%

-0.13%

Volatility

EVAL.L vs. IEVL.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for SPDR MSCI Europe Value UCITS ETF (EVAL.L) is 4.12%, while iShares Edge MSCI Europe Value Factor UCITS ETF EUR Accumulating (IEVL.L) has a volatility of 4.85%. This indicates that EVAL.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IEVL.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EVAL.LIEVL.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.12%

4.85%

-0.73%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.49%

11.06%

-0.57%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.05%

13.52%

-0.47%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.45%

15.24%

-0.79%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.97%

17.13%

-0.16%

EVAL.L vs. IEVL.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

EVAL.L has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than IEVL.L's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

EVAL.L vs. IEVL.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither EVAL.L nor IEVL.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.93, EVAL.L and IEVL.L move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

On fees, EVAL.L is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

EVAL.L is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for IEVL.L.

EVAL.L tracks MSCI Europe Value NR EUR, while IEVL.L tracks MSCI Europe Enhanced Value Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for EVAL.L and 0.25% for IEVL.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EVAL.L and IEVL.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer