EVAL.L vs. FLXD.L
EVAL.L (SPDR MSCI Europe Value UCITS ETF) and FLXD.L (Franklin European Quality Dividend UCITS ETF) are both Europe Equities funds - EVAL.L tracks the MSCI Europe Value NR EUR while FLXD.L tracks the MSCI Europe High Div Yld NR EUR. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, EVAL.L returned 14.15%/yr vs 13.18%/yr for FLXD.L. A 0.72 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. EVAL.L charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for FLXD.L.
Performance
EVAL.L vs. FLXD.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EVAL.L achieves a 11.21% return, which is significantly higher than FLXD.L's 9.29% return.
EVAL.L
- 1D
- 0.67%
- 1M
- 4.21%
- YTD
- 11.21%
- 6M
- 14.15%
- 1Y
- 34.42%
- 3Y*
- 20.71%
- 5Y*
- 14.15%
- 10Y*
- 11.80%
FLXD.L
- 1D
- 0.49%
- 1M
- -0.03%
- YTD
- 9.29%
- 6M
- 12.43%
- 1Y
- 20.53%
- 3Y*
- 19.08%
- 5Y*
- 13.18%
- 10Y*
- —
EVAL.L vs. FLXD.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EVAL.L SPDR MSCI Europe Value UCITS ETF | 11.21% | 41.81% | 4.36% | 11.02% | 1.33% | 19.13% | -2.54% | 16.22% | -13.77% | 2.94% |
FLXD.L Franklin European Quality Dividend UCITS ETF | 9.29% | 31.50% | 8.51% | 9.23% | 6.26% | 10.54% | 1.48% | 13.79% | -11.21% | -3.30% |
Correlation
The correlation between EVAL.L and FLXD.L is 0.58, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.58 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.61 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.71 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 11, 2017 | 0.72 |
The correlation between EVAL.L and FLXD.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.58 (1 year) to 0.72 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
EVAL.L vs. FLXD.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
EVAL.L
FLXD.L
Financial Services
Industrials
Healthcare
Technology
Consumer Defensive
Consumer Cyclical
Basic Materials
Energy
Utilities
Communication Services
Real Estate
Financial Services
EVAL.L
FLXD.L
Industrials
EVAL.L
FLXD.L
Healthcare
EVAL.L
FLXD.L
Technology
EVAL.L
FLXD.L
Consumer Defensive
EVAL.L
FLXD.L
Consumer Cyclical
EVAL.L
FLXD.L
Basic Materials
EVAL.L
FLXD.L
Energy
EVAL.L
FLXD.L
Utilities
EVAL.L
FLXD.L
Communication Services
EVAL.L
FLXD.L
Real Estate
EVAL.L
FLXD.L
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EVAL.L vs. FLXD.L — Risk / Return Rank
EVAL.L
FLXD.L
EVAL.L vs. FLXD.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR MSCI Europe Value UCITS ETF (EVAL.L) and Franklin European Quality Dividend UCITS ETF (FLXD.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| EVAL.L | FLXD.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.23 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.01 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.47 | 1.43 | +0.04 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.39 | 5.64 | -2.25 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.59 | 15.75 | -3.15 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| EVAL.L | FLXD.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.63 | 2.40 | +0.23 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.98 | 1.21 | -0.23 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.69 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.37 | 0.64 | -0.27 |
Drawdowns
EVAL.L vs. FLXD.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EVAL.L drawdown since its inception was -40.72%, which is greater than FLXD.L's maximum drawdown of -29.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EVAL.L and FLXD.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EVAL.L | FLXD.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -40.72% | -29.71% | -11.01% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.10% | -3.62% | -6.48% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.35% | -7.78% | -6.57% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -14.61% | -11.76% | -2.85% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -37.77% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.61% | -2.77% | +1.16% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.10% | -4.13% | -6.97% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.73% | 1.30% | +1.43% |
Volatility
EVAL.L vs. FLXD.L - Volatility Comparison
SPDR MSCI Europe Value UCITS ETF (EVAL.L) has a higher volatility of 4.12% compared to Franklin European Quality Dividend UCITS ETF (FLXD.L) at 2.67%. This indicates that EVAL.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FLXD.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EVAL.L | FLXD.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.12% | 2.67% | +1.45% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.49% | 6.95% | +3.54% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.05% | 8.52% | +4.53% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.45% | 10.85% | +3.60% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.97% | 12.91% | +4.06% |
EVAL.L vs. FLXD.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
EVAL.L has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than FLXD.L's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
EVAL.L vs. FLXD.L - Dividend Comparison
EVAL.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while FLXD.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.37%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EVAL.L SPDR MSCI Europe Value UCITS ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
FLXD.L Franklin European Quality Dividend UCITS ETF | 4.37% | 4.90% | 5.18% | 5.75% | 5.87% | 5.51% | 3.90% | 1.53% | 1.09% |
Frequently Asked Questions
EVAL.L and FLXD.L have a correlation of 0.58, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, EVAL.L is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
EVAL.L is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for FLXD.L.
EVAL.L tracks MSCI Europe Value NR EUR, while FLXD.L tracks MSCI Europe High Div Yld NR EUR. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Franklin Templeton. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for EVAL.L and 0.25% for FLXD.L.
Find the right allocation for EVAL.L and FLXD.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer