PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EVAL.L vs. CS1.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EVAL.L vs. CS1.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in SPDR MSCI Europe Value UCITS ETF (EVAL.L) and Amundi ETF MSCI Spain UCITS ETF EUR (C) (CS1.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

EVAL.L is traded in GBP, while CS1.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the CS1.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EVAL.L achieves a 11.68% return, which is significantly lower than CS1.L's 12.56% return. Over the past 10 years, EVAL.L has underperformed CS1.L with an annualized return of 12.19%, while CS1.L has yielded a comparatively higher 13.85% annualized return.


EVAL.L

1D
0.08%
1M
0.17%
YTD
11.68%
6M
12.22%
1Y
33.62%
3Y*
21.39%
5Y*
14.28%
10Y*
12.19%

CS1.L

1D
-0.38%
1M
8.23%
YTD
12.56%
6M
13.34%
1Y
44.50%
3Y*
32.98%
5Y*
20.62%
10Y*
13.85%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EVAL.L vs. CS1.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
EVAL.L
SPDR MSCI Europe Value UCITS ETF
11.68%41.82%4.36%11.01%1.33%19.13%-2.54%16.22%-13.77%15.54%
CS1.L
Amundi ETF MSCI Spain UCITS ETF EUR (C)
12.56%62.63%14.12%24.14%4.89%0.59%-7.48%8.06%-11.27%15.93%

Correlation

The correlation between EVAL.L and CS1.L is 0.79, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.79

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.76

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.78

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.78

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 18, 2015

0.79

The correlation between EVAL.L and CS1.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.76 to 0.79 - a consistent structural relationship.

EVAL.L vs. CS1.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
EVAL.L
CS1.L

Financial Services

21.7%
40.7%

Industrials

17.6%
15.9%

Healthcare

12.8%
0.6%

Technology

12.3%
3.5%

Consumer Defensive

8.4%
0.3%

Consumer Cyclical

6.6%
11.0%

Basic Materials

6.4%
1.5%

Energy

5.1%
2.6%

Utilities

4.6%
18.1%

Communication Services

3.8%
2.4%

Real Estate

0.7%
3.3%

Financial Services

EVAL.L
21.7%
CS1.L
40.7%

Industrials

EVAL.L
17.6%
CS1.L
15.9%

Healthcare

EVAL.L
12.8%
CS1.L
0.6%

Technology

EVAL.L
12.3%
CS1.L
3.5%

Consumer Defensive

EVAL.L
8.4%
CS1.L
0.3%

Consumer Cyclical

EVAL.L
6.6%
CS1.L
11.0%

Basic Materials

EVAL.L
6.4%
CS1.L
1.5%

Energy

EVAL.L
5.1%
CS1.L
2.6%

Utilities

EVAL.L
4.6%
CS1.L
18.1%

Communication Services

EVAL.L
3.8%
CS1.L
2.4%

Real Estate

EVAL.L
0.7%
CS1.L
3.3%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EVAL.L vs. CS1.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EVAL.L
EVAL.L Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
EVAL.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EVAL.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
EVAL.L Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
EVAL.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
EVAL.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7474
Martin Ratio Rank

CS1.L
CS1.L Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
CS1.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CS1.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8989
Sortino Ratio Rank
CS1.L Omega Ratio Rank: 8989
Omega Ratio Rank
CS1.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
CS1.L Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EVAL.L vs. CS1.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR MSCI Europe Value UCITS ETF (EVAL.L) and Amundi ETF MSCI Spain UCITS ETF EUR (C) (CS1.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


EVAL.LCS1.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.18

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.13

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.46

1.49

-0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.31

4.28

-0.97

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.23

14.54

-2.31

EVAL.L vs. CS1.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EVAL.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.54, which is comparable to the CS1.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.73. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EVAL.L and CS1.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

EVAL.L vs. CS1.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EVAL.L drawdown since its inception was -40.72%, smaller than the maximum CS1.L drawdown of -57.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EVAL.L and CS1.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EVAL.LCS1.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-40.72%

-57.96%

+17.24%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.10%

-10.34%

+0.24%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.34%

-12.64%

-1.70%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-14.61%

-17.57%

+2.96%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-37.77%

-38.87%

+1.10%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.24%

-0.93%

-0.31%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.33%

-17.29%

+5.96%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.74%

3.05%

-0.31%

Volatility

EVAL.L vs. CS1.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for SPDR MSCI Europe Value UCITS ETF (EVAL.L) is 3.18%, while Amundi ETF MSCI Spain UCITS ETF EUR (C) (CS1.L) has a volatility of 3.91%. This indicates that EVAL.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CS1.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EVAL.LCS1.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.18%

3.91%

-0.73%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.74%

13.63%

-2.89%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.22%

16.28%

-3.06%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.51%

18.78%

-2.27%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.82%

19.32%

-1.50%

EVAL.L vs. CS1.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

EVAL.L has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than CS1.L's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

EVAL.L vs. CS1.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither EVAL.L nor CS1.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


EVAL.L and CS1.L have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, EVAL.L is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

EVAL.L is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for CS1.L.

EVAL.L tracks MSCI Europe Value NR EUR, while CS1.L tracks BME IBEX 35 NR EUR. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Amundi. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for EVAL.L and 0.25% for CS1.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EVAL.L and CS1.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer