PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EUSA vs. FMTM
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

EUSA vs. FMTM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares MSCI USA Equal Weighted ETF (EUSA) and MarketDesk Focused U.S. Momentum ETF (FMTM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

EUSA vs. FMTM - Yearly Performance Comparison


Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EUSA achieves a -0.88% return, which is significantly lower than FMTM's 10.10% return.


EUSA

1D
0.33%
1M
-5.30%
YTD
-0.88%
6M
-0.11%
1Y
10.76%
3Y*
12.34%
5Y*
6.88%
10Y*
10.84%

FMTM

1D
1.78%
1M
-6.27%
YTD
10.10%
6M
17.46%
1Y
39.15%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


EUSA vs. FMTM - Expense Ratio Comparison

EUSA has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than FMTM's 0.45% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

EUSA vs. FMTM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EUSA
EUSA Risk / Return Rank: 3434
Overall Rank
EUSA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3232
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EUSA Sortino Ratio Rank: 3333
Sortino Ratio Rank
EUSA Omega Ratio Rank: 3333
Omega Ratio Rank
EUSA Calmar Ratio Rank: 3434
Calmar Ratio Rank
EUSA Martin Ratio Rank: 4141
Martin Ratio Rank

FMTM
FMTM Risk / Return Rank: 8484
Overall Rank
FMTM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FMTM Sortino Ratio Rank: 8282
Sortino Ratio Rank
FMTM Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
FMTM Calmar Ratio Rank: 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
FMTM Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EUSA vs. FMTM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI USA Equal Weighted ETF (EUSA) and MarketDesk Focused U.S. Momentum ETF (FMTM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


EUSAFMTMDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.63

1.68

-1.05

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.01

2.20

-1.20

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.14

1.30

-0.16

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.89

3.23

-2.34

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

4.05

12.18

-8.13

EUSA vs. FMTM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EUSA Sharpe Ratio is 0.63, which is lower than the FMTM Sharpe Ratio of 1.68. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EUSA and FMTM, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


EUSAFMTMDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.63

1.68

-1.05

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.41

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.59

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.67

1.71

-1.04

Correlation

The correlation between EUSA and FMTM is 0.67, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

EUSA vs. FMTM - Dividend Comparison

EUSA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.68%, more than FMTM's 0.27% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EUSA
iShares MSCI USA Equal Weighted ETF
1.68%1.63%1.47%1.53%1.73%1.23%1.45%1.49%2.01%1.50%1.59%2.21%
FMTM
MarketDesk Focused U.S. Momentum ETF
0.27%0.30%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

EUSA vs. FMTM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EUSA drawdown since its inception was -39.16%, which is greater than FMTM's maximum drawdown of -12.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EUSA and FMTM.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


EUSAFMTMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-39.16%

-12.12%

-27.04%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.37%

-12.12%

-0.25%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.24%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-39.16%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.38%

-6.27%

+0.89%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.63%

-1.89%

-2.74%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.70%

3.21%

-0.51%

Volatility

EUSA vs. FMTM - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares MSCI USA Equal Weighted ETF (EUSA) is 4.68%, while MarketDesk Focused U.S. Momentum ETF (FMTM) has a volatility of 10.78%. This indicates that EUSA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FMTM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


EUSAFMTMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.68%

10.78%

-6.10%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.16%

19.28%

-10.12%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.21%

23.38%

-6.17%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.95%

23.19%

-6.24%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.33%

23.19%

-4.86%