EURL vs. TNA
EURL (Direxion Daily FTSE Europe Bull 3x Shares) and TNA (Direxion Daily Small Cap Bull 3X Shares) are both Leveraged Equities funds from Direxion - EURL tracks the FTSE Developed Europe Index (300%) while TNA tracks the Russell 2000 Index (300%). Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, EURL returned 11.27%/yr vs 8.78%/yr for TNA. A 0.68 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. EURL charges 1.07%/yr vs 1.14%/yr for TNA.
Performance
EURL vs. TNA - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EURL achieves a 13.73% return, which is significantly lower than TNA's 53.14% return. Over the past 10 years, EURL has outperformed TNA with an annualized return of 11.27%, while TNA has yielded a comparatively lower 8.78% annualized return.
EURL
- 1D
- -0.06%
- 1M
- 12.42%
- YTD
- 13.73%
- 6M
- 19.84%
- 1Y
- 43.44%
- 3Y*
- 31.61%
- 5Y*
- 5.43%
- 10Y*
- 11.27%
TNA
- 1D
- 2.53%
- 1M
- 15.26%
- YTD
- 53.14%
- 6M
- 40.13%
- 1Y
- 130.01%
- 3Y*
- 25.74%
- 5Y*
- -6.50%
- 10Y*
- 8.78%
EURL vs. TNA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EURL Direxion Daily FTSE Europe Bull 3x Shares | 13.73% | 105.85% | -11.42% | 44.19% | -54.41% | 46.59% | -23.19% | 72.61% | -46.39% | 91.32% |
TNA Direxion Daily Small Cap Bull 3X Shares | 53.14% | 9.82% | 7.21% | 26.24% | -62.48% | 27.88% | -7.82% | 71.88% | -39.89% | 39.15% |
Correlation
The correlation between EURL and TNA is 0.69, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.69 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.66 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.69 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.67 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 22, 2014 | 0.68 |
The correlation between EURL and TNA has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.66 to 0.69 - a consistent structural relationship.
EURL vs. TNA - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
EURL
TNA
Financial Services
Industrials
Healthcare
Technology
Consumer Defensive
Consumer Cyclical
Basic Materials
Energy
Utilities
Communication Services
Real Estate
Financial Services
EURL
TNA
Industrials
EURL
TNA
Healthcare
EURL
TNA
Technology
EURL
TNA
Consumer Defensive
EURL
TNA
Consumer Cyclical
EURL
TNA
Basic Materials
EURL
TNA
Energy
EURL
TNA
Utilities
EURL
TNA
Communication Services
EURL
TNA
Real Estate
EURL
TNA
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EURL vs. TNA — Risk / Return Rank
EURL
TNA
EURL vs. TNA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily FTSE Europe Bull 3x Shares (EURL) and Direxion Daily Small Cap Bull 3X Shares (TNA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| EURL | TNA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.25 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.15 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.16 | 1.29 | -0.14 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.11 | 3.63 | -2.52 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.50 | 11.92 | -8.42 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
EURL vs. TNA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EURL drawdown since its inception was -84.65%, roughly equal to the maximum TNA drawdown of -88.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EURL and TNA.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EURL | TNA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -84.65% | -88.09% | +3.44% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -33.05% | -32.53% | -0.52% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -38.81% | -65.78% | +26.97% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -75.24% | -82.36% | +7.12% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -84.65% | -88.09% | +3.44% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -8.76% | -35.23% | +26.47% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -36.91% | -33.92% | -2.99% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 10.56% | 9.91% | +0.65% |
Volatility
EURL vs. TNA - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Direxion Daily FTSE Europe Bull 3x Shares (EURL) is 17.98%, while Direxion Daily Small Cap Bull 3X Shares (TNA) has a volatility of 21.54%. This indicates that EURL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TNA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EURL | TNA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 17.98% | 21.54% | -3.56% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 40.51% | 42.61% | -2.10% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 48.09% | 58.70% | -10.61% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 53.55% | 67.57% | -14.02% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 55.82% | 68.54% | -12.72% |
EURL vs. TNA - Expense Ratio Comparison
EURL has a 1.07% expense ratio, which is lower than TNA's 1.14% expense ratio.
Dividends
EURL vs. TNA - Dividend Comparison
EURL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.37%, more than TNA's 0.39% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EURL Direxion Daily FTSE Europe Bull 3x Shares | 1.37% | 1.50% | 3.51% | 2.50% | 1.80% | 0.33% | 0.41% | 1.17% | 3.07% | 0.38% |
TNA Direxion Daily Small Cap Bull 3X Shares | 0.39% | 0.78% | 0.93% | 1.27% | 0.31% | 0.06% | 0.03% | 0.44% | 0.36% | 0.15% |
Frequently Asked Questions
EURL and TNA have a correlation of 0.69, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
TNA has higher volatility (21.54%) compared to EURL (17.98%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EURL dropped -84.65% vs TNA's -88.09%.
On 10-year performance, EURL leads with 11.27% vs 8.78% for TNA. On fees, EURL is cheaper at 1.07% per year. On volatility, EURL has been the lower-risk option at 17.98%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, EURL has performed better with a 11.27% return vs 8.78%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
EURL is cheaper with a 1.07% expense ratio, compared with 1.14% for TNA.
EURL has the higher dividend yield at 1.37%, compared with 0.39% for TNA.
EURL tracks FTSE Developed Europe Index (300%), while TNA tracks Russell 2000 Index (300%). Their fees differ too: 1.07% for EURL and 1.14% for TNA.
TNA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.01 vs 0.77), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for EURL and TNA
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer